Global legal pluralism

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 5, Issue , 2009, Pages 243-262

  Michaels, Ralf ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community; Comparative law; Conflict of laws; International law; Recognition; State

Indexed keywords

EID: 76249114522     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172311     Document Type: Article

References (162)

1. Allott A, Woodman GR. 1985. Introduction. In People's Law and State Law: The Bellagio Papers, ed. A Allott, GRWoodman, pp. 1-9. Dordrecht, Neth. : Foris
2. Amstutz M. 2002. In-between worlds: Marleasing and the emergence of interlegality in legal reasoning. Eur. Law J. 11:766-784
3. Anders G. 2003. Legal pluralism in a transnational context: where disciplines converge. Cah. d'Anthropol. Droit 2003:113-128
4. Anderson GW. 2005. Constitutional Rights After Globalization. Oxford: Hart
5. Antoniolli L. 2005. Taking legal pluralism seriously: the Alien Tort Claims Act and the role of international law before U. S. federal courts. Indiana J. Global Legal Stud. 12:651-665
6. Arnaud AJ. 2003. Du lien tribal dans le village plańetaire. In La quête anthropologique du droit-Autour de la d́emarche d'Etienne Le Roy, ed. C Eberhard, G Vernicos, pp. 27-41. Paris: Karthala
7. Arthurs HW. 1985. Without the Law: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth Century England. Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press
8. Arup C. 2000. The New World Trade Organization Agreements. Globalizing Law Through Services and Intellectual Property. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
9. Bacquero Cruz J. 2008. The legacy of the Maastricht-Urteil and the pluralist movement. Eur. Law J. 14:389-422
10. Bälz K. 1995. Shari'a and qanun in Egyptian law: a systems theory approach to legal pluralism. Yearb. Islamic Middle East. Law 2:37-53
11. Barzilai G. 2008. Beyond relativism: Where is political power in legal pluralism? Theor. Inq. Law 9:395-416
12. Belley JG. 1997. Le droit comme terra incognita: conqúerir et construire le pluralisme juridique. Can. J. Law Soc. 12:1-15
13. Bennett TW. 2006. Comparative law and African customary law. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, ed. M Reimann, R Zimmermann, pp. 641-673 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
14. Beraudo JP. 2005. Faut-il avoir peur du contrat sans loi? In Le droit international priv́e: esprit et ḿethodes. Ḿelanges en l'honneur de Paul Lagarde, pp. 93-112. Paris: Dalloz
15. Berger KP. 1999. The Creeping Codification of the Lex Mercatoria. Deventer: Kluwer
16. Berman PS. 2002. The globalization of jurisdiction. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 151:311-529
17. Berman PS. 2005a. From international law to law and globalization. Columbia J. Transnatl. Law 43:485-556
18. Berman PS. 2005b. Towards a cosmopolitan vision of conflict of laws: redefining governmental interests in a global era. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 153:1819-1882
19. Berman PS. 2007a. A pluralist approach to international law. Yale J. Int. Law 32:301-329
20. Berman PS. 2007b. Global legal pluralism. South. Calif. Law Rev. 80:1155-1237
21. Besson S. 2006. How international is the European legal order? Retracing Tuori's steps in the exploration of European legal pluralism. NoFo-J. Extreme Legal Posit. 5:50-70. http://www. helsinki. fi/ nofo/NoFo5Besson. pdf
22. Boden D. 2005. Le pluralisme juridique en droit international priv́e. Arch. de Philos. du droit 49:275-316
23. Burke-White W. 2004. International legal pluralism. Mich. J. Int. Law 25:963-979
24. Chanock M. 1985. Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
25. Chiba M. 1986. Asian Indigenous Law in Interaction with Received Law. London/New York: KPI
26. Chiba M. 1989. Legal Pluralism: Toward a General Theory through Japanese Legal Culture. Tokyo: Tokai Univ. Press
27. Chiba M. 1998. Other phases of legal pluralism in the contemporary world. Ratio Juris 11:228-245
28. Corsale M. 1994. Legal pluralism and the corporatist model in the welfare state. Ratio Juris 7:95-103
29. Cutler C. 2003. Private Power and Public Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
30. de Julios-Campuzano A. 2005. Globalizaci ̀ on, pluralismo juŕidico y ciencia del derecho. Riv. int. filos. Diritto 82:47-84
31. Delmas-Marty M. 2002. Towards a Truly Common Law: Europe as a Laboratory for Legal Pluralism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
32. Delmas-Marty M. 2009. Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart
33. de Ly F. 1992. International Business Law and Lex Mercatoria. Amsterdam: North Holland
34. Denninger E. 2005. Recht und rechtliche Verfahren als Klammer in einer multikulturellen Gesellschaft. In Summa. Dieter Simon zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. RM Kiesow, R Ogorek, S Simitis, pp. 117-132 Frankfurt M. : Klostermann
35. Dezalay Y, Garth B. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press
36. Dupret B. 2007. Legal pluralism, plurality of laws, and legal practices: theories, critiques, and praxiological re-specification. Eur. J. Legal Stud. 1:1. http://www. ejls. eu/1/14UK. pdf
37. Eberhard C. 2001. Towards an intercultural legal theory: the dialogical challenge. Soc. Legal Stud. 10:171-201 (Pubitemid 33573126)
38. Fisher T. 2008. Nomos without narrative. Theor. Inq. Law 9:473-502
39. Foster K. 2003. Is there a global sports law? Entertain. Law 2:1-18
40. Gannaǵe L. 2007. Le contrat sans loi en droit international priv́e. In General Reports of the XVIIth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, ed. K Boele-Woelki, S van Erp, pp. 275-308. Utrecht/Brussels: Eleven Int. /Bruylant
41. Gessner V. 2002. Rechtspluralismus und soziale Bewegungen. Z. Rechtssoziologie 20:277-305
42. Gilissen J. 1971. Introduction à l'étude comparée du pluralisme juridique. In Le Pluralisme juridique: Études publíees sous la direction de John Gilissen, pp. 7-18. Brussels: Ed. Univ. Bruxelles
43. Glenn HP. 2007. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press. 3rd ed.
44. Godoy AM. 2004. Globalization, state law and legal pluralism in Brasil. J. Legal Plur. 50:61-69
45. Goldman DB. 2007. Globalisation and the Western Legal Tradition: Recurring Patterns of Law and Authority. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
46. Goodale M, Merry SE, eds. 2007. The Practice of Human Rights. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
47. Greenhouse CJ. 1996. A Moment's Notice: Time Politics Across Cultures. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
48. Griffiths A. 2002. Legal pluralism. In An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. R Banakar, M Travers, pp. 289-310. Oxford: Hart
49. Griffiths A. 2006. Customary law in a transnational world: legal pluralism revisited. In Conversing with the Ancestors: Concepts and Institutions in Polynesian Customary Law, ed. RA Benton, pp. 9-35. Hamilton, N. Z. : Te Matahauariki Inst., Univ. Waikato
50. Griffiths J. 1986. What is legal pluralism? J. Legal Plur. 24:1-55
51. Griffiths J. 2006. The idea of sociology of law and its relation to law and to sociology. Curr. Legal Issues 8:49-68
52. Günther K. 2008. Legal pluralism or uniform concept of law? Globalisation as a problem of legal theory. NoFo-J. Extreme Legal Posit. 5:5-21. http://www. helsinki. fi/nofo/NoFo5Gunther. pdf
53. Günther K, Randeria S. 2001. Recht, Kultur und Gesellschaft im Prozess der Globalisierung. Bad Homburg:Werner Reimers Stiftung.
54. Guterman SL. 1990. The Principle of the Personality of Law in the Germanic Kingdoms of Western Europe from the Fifth to the Eleventh Century. New York/Bern/Frankfurt M. /Paris: Peter Lang
55. Hertogh M. 2008. What is non-state law? Mapping the other hemisphere of the legal world. In International Governance and Law: State Regulation and Non-State Law, ed. J van Schooten, JM Verschuuren, pp. 11-30. Cheltenham: Elgar
56. Hoekema AJ. 2004. Rechtspluralisme en interlegaliteit. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univ. Press
57. Hsu JY, Saxenian AL. 2000. The limits of guanxi capitalism: transnational collaboration between Taiwan and the USA. Environ. Plann. A 32:1991-2005
58. Jayme E. 1995. Le droit international priv́e postmoderne. Recueil des Cours 251:9-267
59. Johnson DR, Post D. 1996. Law and borders: the rise of law in cyberspace. Stanford Law Rev. 48:1367-1402
60. Kahn P. 1982. Droit international ́economique, droit du d́eveloppement, lex mercatoria: concept unique ou pluralisme des ordres juridiques? In Le droit des relations internationales ́economiques: Etudes offertes ̀a Berthold Goldman, ed. P Fouchard, P Kahn, A Lyon-Caen, pp. 97-107. Paris: Litec
61. Karavas V, Teubner G. 2003. http://www. CompanyNameSucks. com: the horizontal effect of fundamental rights on 'private parties' within autonomous Internet law. German Law J. 4:1335-1356
62. Kennedy D. 2007. One, two, three, many legal orders: legal pluralism and the cosmopolitan dream. N. Y. Univ. Law Rev. Law Soc. Change 31:641-659
63. Kollewijn RD. 1951. Conflicts ofWestern and non-Western law. Int. Law Q. 4:307-325
64. Koskenniemi M. 2005. Global legal pluralism: multiple regimes and multiple modes of thought. http://www. helsinki. fi/eci/Publications/ MKPluralism-Harvard-05d%5B1%5D. pdf
65. Krisch N. 2006. The pluralism of global administrative law. Eur. J. Int. Law 17:247-278
66. Lagarde P. 1982. Approche critique de la lex mercatoria. In Le droit des relations internationales ́economiques: Etudes offertes ̀a Berthold Goldman, ed. P Fouchard, P Kahn, A Lyon-Caen, pp. 125-150 Paris: Litec
67. La Torre M. 1999. Legal pluralism as evolutionary achievement of community law. Ratio Juris 12:182-195
68. Latty F. 2007. La lex sportiva-Recherche sur le droit transnational. Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff/Brill
69. Levit JK. 2005. A bottom-up approach to international lawmaking: the tale of three trade finance instruments. Yale J. Int. Law 30:125-210
70. Lipset D. 2004. 'The trial': a parody of the law amid the mockery of men in post-colonial Papua New Guinea. J. Royal Anthropol. Inst. 10:63-89
71. Lipstein K, Sźaszy I. 1985. Chapter 10: Interpersonal conflict of laws. International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, ed. K Lipstein, III:3-35, Tübingen/The Hague: Mohr/Martinus Nijhoff
72. Luhmann N. 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
73. MacCormick N. 1993. Beyond the sovereign state. Mod. Law Rev. 56:1-18
74. MacCormick N. 1999. Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
75. Mattei U. 1993. Three patterns of law: taxonomy and change in the world's legal systems. Am. J. Comp. Law 45:5-43
76. Menski W. 2006. Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. 2nd ed.
77. Merry SE. 1988. Legal pluralism. Law Soc. Rev. 22:869-896
78. Merry SE. 1992. Anthropology, law, and transnational processes. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 21:357-379
79. Merry SE. 2005. Human rights and global legal pluralism: reciprocity and disjuncture. See von Benda-Beckmann et al. 2005, pp. 215-232
80. Merry SE. 2006a. Anthropology and international law. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35:99-116
81. Merry SE. 2006b. From law and colonialism to law and globalization. Law Soc. Inq. 28:569-590
82. Merry SE. 2006c. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago/London: Chicago Univ. Press
83. Merry SE. 2008. International law and sociolegal scholarship: toward a spatial global legal pluralism. Stud. Law Polit. Soc. 41:149-168
84. Michaels R. 2005. The re-State-ment of non-state law: the state, choice of law, and the challenge from global legal pluralism. Wayne Law Rev. 51:1209-1259
85. Michaels R. 2006. The true lex mercatoria: private law beyond the state. Indiana J. Legal Stud. 14:447-468
86. Michaels R, Jansen N. 2006. Private law beyond the state? Europeanization, globalization, privatization. Am. J. Comp. Law 54:843-890
87. Molineaux C. 1997. Moving toward a construction lex mercatoria: a lex constructionis. J. Int. Arbitr. 14:55-66
88. Moore SF. 1969. Law and anthropology. Biennial Rev. Anthropol. 1969:252-300
89. Moore SF. 1992. Treating law as knowledge: telling colonial officers what to say to Africans about running "their own" native countries. Law Soc. Rev. 26:11-46
90. Moore SF. 2001. Certainties undone: fifty turbulent years of legal anthropology, 1949-1999. J. Royal Anthropol. Inst. 7:95-116
91. Nuijten MCM. 2005. Transnational migration and the re-framing of normative values. See von Benda-Beckmann et al. 2005, pp. 51-68
92. Ochoa C. 2005. Access to U. S. federal courts as a forum for human rights disputes: pluralism and the Alien Tort Claims Act. Indiana J. Global Legal Stud. 12:631-650
93. ÖrücüE. 2007. A general view of 'legal families' and of 'mixing systems. ' In Comparative Law: A Handbook, ed. E Örücü, D Nelken, pp. 169-187 Oxford: Hart
94. Palmer VV. 2008. Two rival theories of mixed legal systems. Electron. J. Comp. Law 12(1). http://www. ejcl. org/ 121/art121-16. doc
95. Perez O. 2002. Using private-public linkages to regulate environmental conflicts: the case of international construction contracts. J. Law Soc. 29:77-110
96. Perez O. 2003. Normative creativity and global legal pluralism: reflections on the democratic critique of transnational law. Indiana J. Global Legal Stud. 10:25-63
97. Perez O. 2004. Ecological Sensitivity and Global Legal Pluralism: Rethinking the Trade and Environment Conflict. Oxford: Hart
98. Pes G. 2003. Il Pluralismo Giuridico. http://www. dhdi. free. fr/recherches/theoriedroit/memoires/ pesmemoir. pdf
99. Rajagopal B. 2005. The role of law in counter-hegemonic globalization and global legal pluralism: lessons from the Narmada Valley struggle in India. Leiden J. Int. Law 18:345-387
100. Ralser E. 2003. Pluralisme juridique et droit international priv́e. Rev. Rech. Jurid. Droit Prospect. 28:2547-2576
101. Randeria S. 2007. The state of globalization: legal plurality, overlapping sovereignties and ambiguous alliances between civil society and the cunning state in India. Theory Cult. Soc. 24:1-33
102. Reimann M. 2001. Beyond national systems: a comparative law for the international age. Tulane Law Rev. 75:1103-1119
103. Richman BD. 2008. Ethnic networks, extralegal certainty, and globalisation: peering into the diamond industry. In Contractual Certainty in International Trade: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Debates on Institutional Support for Global Economic Exchanges, ed. V Gessner, pp. 31-47. Oxford: Hart
104. Riles A. 2008a. Cultural conflicts. Law Contemp. Probl. 71:273-308
105. Riles A. 2008b. The anti-network: global private law, legal knowledge, and the legitimacy of the state. Am. J. Comp. Law 56:605-630
106. Roberts S. 1998. Against legal pluralism: some reflections on the contemporary enlargement of the legal domain. J. Legal Plur. 42:95-106
107. Roberts S. 2005. After government? On representing law without the state. Mod. Law Rev. 68:1-24
108. Santos BdS. 1987. Law: a map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. J. Law Soc. 14:279-302
109. Santos BdS. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. 2nd ed.
110. Santos BdS. 2006. The heterogeneous state and legal pluralism in Mozambique. Law Soc. Rev. 40:39-75
111. Sarfaty GA. 2007. International norm diffusion in the Pimicikamak Cree nation: a model of legal mediation. Harvard J. Int. Law 48:441-482
112. Schiller NG. 2005. Transborder citizenship: an outcome of legal pluralism within transnational social fields.
113. See von Benda-Beckmann et al. 2005, pp. 27-49.
114. Schilling T. 1997. On the value of a pluralistic concept of legal orders for the understanding of the relation between the legal orders of the European Union and its member states. Arch. Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 83:568-581
115. Shah P. 2005. Globalisation and the challenge of legal transplants in Europe. Singapore J. Legal Stud. 2005:348-361
116. Shah P, Menski W, eds. 2006. Migration, Diasporas and Legal Systems in Europe. London: Routledge.
117. Shahar I. 2008. State, society and the relations between them: implications for the study of legal pluralism. Theor. Inq. Law 9:417-441
118. Sharafi M. 2008. Justice in many rooms since Galanter: de-romanticizing legal pluralism through the cultural defense. Law Contemp. Probl. 71:139-146
119. Sheleef L. 2000. The Future of Tradition: Customary Law, Common Law, and Legal Pluralism. London/Portland, OR: Frank Cass
120. Slaughter AM. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
121. Snyder F. 1981. Colonialism and legal form: the creation of "customary law" in Senegal. J. Legal Plur. 19:49-90
122. Snyder F. 1999. Governing economic globalisation: global legal pluralism and European law. Eur. Law J. 5:334-374
123. Snyder F. 2006. Antidumping law and cross-cultural encounters: toward a legal anthropology of international economic relations. In La quête anthropologique du droit: Autour de la d́emarche d'Etienne Le Roy, ed. C Eberhard, G Vernicos, pp. 59-66. Paris: Karthala
124. Stone Sweet AS. 2006. The new lex mercatoria and transnational governance. J. Eur. Public Policy 13:627-646
125. Strathern M. 1985. Discovering social control. J. Law Soc. 12:111-134
126. Szablowaski D. 2007. Transnational Law and Local Struggles: Mining, Communities and the World Bank. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart
127. Tamanaha BZ. 1993. The folly of the social scientific concept of legal pluralism. J. Law Soc. 20:192-217
128. Tamanaha BZ. 2000. A non-essentialist concept of legal pluralism. J. Law Soc. 27:296-321
129. Tamanaha BZ. 2008. Understanding legal pluralism: past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Rev. 30:375-411
130. Teubner G. 1992. The two faces of Janus: rethinking legal pluralism. Cardozo Law Rev. 5:1443-1462
131. Teubner G. 1993. Law as an Autopoietic System. London: Blackwell
132. Teubner G. 1996. Global Bukowina: legal pluralism in the world society. In Global Law Without a State, ed. G Teubner, pp. 3-17. Aldershot: Ashgate
133. Teubner G. 2004. Global private regimes: neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors in world society? In Globalization and Public Governance, ed. KH Ladeur, pp. 71-87. Aldershot: Ashgate
134. Teubner G, Fischer-Lescano A. 2004. Regime-collisions: the vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law. Mich. J. Int. Law 25:999-1046
135. Teubner G, Fischer-Lescano A. 2006. Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts. Frankfurt M. : Suhrkamp
136. Teubner G, Korth P. 2009. Two kinds of legal pluralism: collision of transnational regimes in the double fragmentation of world society. SSRN Accept. Pap. Ser. http://ssrn. com/abstract=1416041
137. Tie W. 1999. Legal Pluralism: Toward a Multicultural Conception of Law. Aldershot: Ashgate.
138. Tontti J. 2001. European legal pluralism as a rebirth of ius commune. Retfaerd Nord. Jurid. Tidskr. 94:40-54
139. Tsuk Mitchell D. 2007. Architect of Justice: Felix S. Cohen and the Founding of American Legal Pluralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
140. Twining W. 2000. Globalisation and Legal Theory. Evanston, IL: Northwest. Univ. Press
141. Twining W. 2009. General Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
142. Twining W. 2010. Normative and legal pluralism: a global perspective. Duke J. Comp. Int. Law. In press
143. Uche UU. 1992. Conflict of laws in a multi-ethnic setting: lessons from Anglophone Africa. Recueil des Cours 1991-III:273-438
144. Vec M. 2006. Recht und Normierung in der Industriellen Revolution: Neue Strukturen der Normsetzung in Völkerrecht, staatlicher Gesetzgebung und gesellschaftlicher Selbstnormierung. Frankfurt M. : Klostermann
145. von Benda-Beckmann F. 1988. Comment on Merry. Law Soc. Rev. 22(5):897-901
146. von Benda-Beckmann F. 2002. Who's afraid of legal pluralism? J. Legal Plur. 47:37-82
147. von Benda-Beckmann F, von Benda-Beckmann K. 2007. Transnationalisation of law, globalisation and legal pluralism: a legal anthropological perspective in globalisation and resistance. In Law Reform in Asia since the Crisis, ed. C Antons, V Gessner, pp. 53-80. Oxford: Hart
148. von Benda-Beckmann F, von Benda-Beckmann K, Griffiths A. 2005. Mobile People, Mobile Law. Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World. Aldershot: Ashgate
149. von Benda-Beckmann F, von Benda-Beckmann K, Griffiths A. 2009. Space and legal pluralism: an introduction. In Spatializing Law: An Anthropological Geography of Law in Society, ed. F von Benda-Beckmann, K von Benda-Beckmann, A Griffiths, pp. 1-29. Aldershot: Ashgate
150. von Benda-Beckmann K. 2001. Transnational dimensions of legal pluralism. In Begegnung und Konflikt- eine kulturanthropologische Bestandsaufnahme, ed. WFikentscher, pp. 33-49. Munich: Verlag Bayer. Akad. Wiss. /CH Beck
151. von Bogdandy A. 2008. Pluralism, direct effect, and the ultimate say: on the relationship between international and domestic constitutional law. Int. J. Const. Law 6:397-413
152. von Mehren A. 1981. The significance of the state for choice of law. In Festschrift f ür Konrad Zweigert zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. H Bernstein, U Drobnig, H K̈otz, pp. 287-306. Tübingen: Mohr
153. Wai R. 2008. The interlegality of transnational private law. Law Contemp. Probl. 71:107-127
154. Walker N. 2010. Out of place and out of time: law's fading co-ordinates. Edinburgh Law Rev. 14:1
155. Wastell S. 2001. Presuming scale, making diversity: on the mischiefs of measurement and the global:local metonym in theories of law and culture. Crit. Anthropol. 21:185-210
156. Weiner JF. 2006. Eliciting customary law. Asia Pac. J. Anthropol. 7:15-25
157. Wilhelmsson T. 2004. The ethical pluralism of late modern Europe and codification of European contract law. In The Need for a European Contract Law-Empirical and Legal Perspectives, ed. Jan Smits, pp. 121-152 Groningen: Europa Law
158. Woodman GR. 1998. Ideological combat and social observation: recent debate about legal pluralism. J. Legal Plur. 40:21-60
159. Woodman GR. 2006. The involvement of English common law with other laws. In La quête anthropologique du droit: Autour de la d́emarche d'Etienne Le Roy, ed. C Eberhard, G Vernicos, pp. 477-500. Paris: Karthala
160. Woodman GR. 2007. Social and religious diversity, legal pluralism: Can state law survive? IIUM Law J. 15:154-170
161. Yeung HWC. 1998. Transnational Corporations and Business Networks: Hong Kong Firms in the ASEAN Region. London: Routledge
162. Yilmaz I. 2002. Dynamic legal pluralism in England: the challenge of postmodern Muslim legality to legal modernity. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 28:343-354