Marker-based prediction of hybrid performance in maize single-crosses involving doubled haploids

Maydica

Volumn 54, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 353-362

  Schrag, T A ^a   Frisch, M ^b   Dhillon, B S ^a   Melchinger, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Best linear unbiased prediction; General combining ability; Hybrid performance prediction; Selection

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 76249098683     PISSN: 00256153     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (59)

1. BERNARDO R., 1991 Correlation between testcross performance of lines at early and late selfing generations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 17-21.
2. BERNARDO R., 1992 Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 628-634.
3. BERNARDO R., 1994 Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci. 34: 20-25.
4. BERNARDO R., 1995 Genetic models for predicting maize singlecross performance in unbalanced yield trial data. Crop Sci. 35: 141-147.
5. BERNARDO R., 1996a Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci. 36: 50-56.
6. BERNARDO R., 1996b Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance given erroneous inbred relationships. Crop Sci. 36: 862-866.
7. BERNARDO R., 1996c Best linear unbiased prediction of the performance of crosses between untested maize inbred. Crop Sci. 36: 872-876.
8. BERNARDO R., 1998a A model for marker-assisted selection among single crosses with multiple genetic markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 473-478.
9. BERNARDO R., 1998b Predicting the performance of untested single crosses: trait and marker data. pp. 117-127. In: K. R. Lamkey, J. E. Staub (Eds.), Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA.
10. BERNARDO R., 1999 Marker-assisted best linear unbiased prediction of single-cross performance. Crop Sci. 39: 1277-1282.
11. BERNARDO R., 2008 Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 Years. Crop Sci. 48: 1649-1664.
12. BERNARDO R., J. YU, 2007 Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 47: 1082-1090.
13. CHARCOSSET A., B. BONNISSEAU, O. TOUCHEBEUF, J. BURSTIN, P. DUBREUIL, Y. BARRIERE, A. GALLAIS, J. B. DENIS, 1998 Prediction of maize hybrid silage performance using marker data: comparison of several models for specific combining ability. Crop Sci. 38: 38-44.
14. CHARCOSSET A., L. ESSIOUX, 1994 The effect of population-structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 336-343.
15. CHARCOSSET A., M. LEFORT-BUSON, A. GALLAIS, 1991 Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: A theoretical computation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 571-575.
16. CHO Y. I., C. W. PARK, S. W. KWON, J. H. CHIN, H. S. JI, K. J. PARK, S. MCCOUCH, H. J. KOH, 2004 Key DNA markers for predicting heterosis in F1 hybrids of japonica rice. Breed. Sci. 54: 389-397.
17. COCKERHAM C. C., 1967 Prediction of double crosses from single crosses. Der Züchter 37: 160-169.
18. DEKKERS J. C. M., 2007 Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance. J. Anim. Sci. 85: 2104-2114.
19. DUDLEY J. W., M. A. SAGHAI MAROOF, G. K. RUFENER, 1991 Molecular markers and grouping of parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci. 31: 718-723.
20. DUDLEY J. W., M. SAGHAI MAROOF, K. RUFENER, 1992 Molecular marker information and selection of parents in corn breeding programs. Crop Sci. 32: 301-304.
21. EATHINGTON S. R., T. M. CROSBIE, M. D. EDWARDS, R. S. REITER, J. K. BULL, 2007 Molecular markers in a commercial breeding program. Crop Sci. 47: S154-S163.
22. FRISCH M., A. THIEMANN, J. FU, T. A. SCHRAG, S. SCHOLTEN, A. E. MELCHINGER, 2010 Transcriptome-based distance measures for grouping of germplasm and prediction of hybrid performance in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. (accepted).
23. GALLAIS A., J. BORDES, 2007 The use of doubled haploids in recurrent selection and hybrid development in maize. Crop Sci. 47: S190-S201.
24. GARDNER CO., S. A. EBERHART, 1966 Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22: 439-452.
25. GARTNER T., M. STEINFATH, S. ANDORF, J. LISEC, R. C. MEYER, T. ALTMANN, L. WILLMITZER, J. SELBIG, 2009 Improved heterosis prediction by combining information on DNA-and metabolic markers. PLoS ONE 4: e5220.
26. HALLAUER A. R., 1990 Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 35: 1-16.
27. HALLAUER A. R., J. B. MIRANDA FILHO, 1988 Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
28. HAYES B. J., P. J. BOWMAN, A. J. CHAMBERLAIN, M. E. GODDARD, 2009 Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 433-443.
29. HEFFNER E. L., M. E. SORRELLS, J. L. JANNINK, 2009 Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 49: 1-12.
30. HENDERSON C. R., 1975 Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423-447.
31. HILL R. R., J. L. ROSENBERGER, 1985 Methods for combining data from germplasm evaluation trials. Crop Sci. 25: 467-470.
32. HYTEN D. L., Q. SONG, I. Y. CHOI, M. S. YOON, J. E. SPECHT, L. K. MATUKUMALLI, R. L. NELSON, R. C. SHOEMAKER, N. D. YOUNG, P. B. CREGAN, 2008 High-throughput genotyping with the GoldenGate assay in the complex genome of soybean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 116: 945-952.
33. JOSHI S. P., S. G. BHAVE, K. V. CHOWDARI, G. S. APTE, B. L. DHONUKSHE, K. LALITHA, P. K. RANJEKAR, V. S. GUPTA, 2001 Use of DNA markers in prediction of hybrid performance and heterosis for a three-line hybrid system in rice. Biochem. Genet. 39: 179-200.
34. LEE M., E. B. GODSHALK, K. R. LAMKEY, W. L. WOODMAN, 1989 Association of restriction length polymorphism among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci. 29: 1067-1071.
35. MAENHOUT S., B. DE BAETS, G. HAESAERT, E. VAN BOCKSTAELE, 2007 Support vector machine regression for the prediction of maize hybrid performance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115: 1003-1013.
36. MAENHOUT S., B. DE BAETS, G. HAESAERT, E. VAN BOCKSTAELE, 2008 Marker-based screening of maize inbred lines using support vector machine regression. Euphytica 161:123-131.
37. MELCHINGER A. E., 1993 Use of RFLP markers for analysis of genetic relationships among breeding materials and prediction of hybrid performance. pp. 621-628. In: D. R. Buxton, R. Shibles, R. A. Forsberg, B. L. Blad, K. H. Asay, G. M. Paulsen, R. F. Wilson (Eds.), International Crop Science I. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison WI.
38. MELCHINGER A. E., 1999 Genetic diversity and heterosis. pp. 99-118. In: J. G. Coors, S. Pandey (Eds.), The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
39. MELCHINGER A. E., H. H. GEIGER, G. SEITZ, G. A. SCHMIDT, 1987 Optimum prediction of three-way crosses from single crosses in forage maize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 339-345.
40. MELCHINGER A. E., M. LEE, K. R. LAMKEY, W. L. WOODMAN, 1990 Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms: relation to estimated genetic effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 31: 1033-1040.
41. MEUWISSEN T. H. E., B. J. HAYES, M. E. GODDARD, 2001 Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
42. PANTER D. M., F. L. ALLEN, 1995 Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean: II. Selection of superior crosses from a limited number of yield trials. Crop Sci. 35: 405-410.
43. PIEPHO H. P., 2009 Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Sci. 49: 1165-1176.
44. RÕBER F. K., G. A. GORDILLO, H. H. GEIGER, 2005 In vivo haploid induction in maize - Performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50: 275-283.
45. SCHMIDT W., 2004 Hybridmaiszüchtung bei der KWS SAAT AG. Bericht über die 54. Tagung der Vereinigung der Pflanzenzüchter und Saatgutkaufleute Österreichs 2003, Gumpenstein. pp 1-6 (in German).
46. SCHRAG T. A., A. E. MELCHINGER, A. P. Sørensen, M. FRISCH, 2006 Prediction of single-cross hybrid performance for grain yield and grain dry matter content in maize using AFLP markers associated with QTL. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113: 1037-1047.
47. SCHRAG T. A., H. P. MAURER, A. E. MELCHINGER, H.-P. PIEPHO, J. PELEMAN, M. FRISCH, 2007 Prediction of single-cross hybrid performance in maize using haplotype blocks associated with QTL for grain yield. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114: 1345-1355.
48. SCHRAG T. A., J. MÖHRING, H. P. MAURER, B. S. DHILLON, A. E. MELCHINGER, H.-P. PIEPHO, A. P. SøRENSEN, M. FRISCH, 2009 Molecular marker-based prediction of hybrid performance in maize using unbalanced data from multiple experiments with factorial crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118: 741-751.
49. SCHRAG T. A., J. MÖHRING, B. KUSTERER, B. S. DHILLON, A. E. MELCHINGER, H.-P. PIEPHO, M. FRISCH, 2010 Prediction of hybrid performance in maize using molecular markers and joint analyses of hybrids and parental inbreds. Theor. Appl. Genet. (accepted).
50. st Annual Illinois Corn Breeders' School 2005, Urbana-Champaign.
51. SELLNER E. M., J. W. KIM, M. C. MCC LURE, K. H. TAYLOR, R. D. SCHNABEL, J. F. TAYLOR, 2007 Board-invited review: Applications of genomic information in livestock. J. Anim. Sci. 85: 3148-3158.
52. SMITH O. S., 1986 Covariance between line per se and testcross performance. Crop Sci. 26: 540-543.
53. SMITH O. S., K. HOARD, F. SHAW, R. SHAW, 1999 Prediction of single-cross performance. pp. 277-285. In : J. G. Coors, S. Pandey (Eds.), The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
54. SPRAGUE G. F., L. A. TATUM, 1942 General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34: 923-932.
55. VUYLSTEKE M., M. KUIPER, P. STAM, 2000 Chromosomal regions involved in hybrid performance and heterosis: their AFLP (R) - based identification and practical use in prediction models. Heredity 85: 208-218.
56. XU W., S. S. VIRMANI, 2000 Prediction of hybrid performance in rice: comparisons among best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) procedure, midparent value, and molecular marker distance. Int. Rice Res. Notes 25: 12-13.
57. YU C. Y., S. W. HU, H. X. ZHAO, A. G. GUO, G. L. SUN, 2005 Genetic distances revealed by morphological characters, isozymes, proteins and RAPD markers and their relationships with hybrid performance in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 110: 511-518.
58. ZHANG Q. F., Y. J. GAO, S. H. YANG, R. A. RAGAB, M. A. S. MAROOF, Z. B. LI, 1994 A diallel analysis of heterosis in elite hybrid rice based on RFLPs and microsatellites. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 185-192.
59. ZIEGLER A., I. R. KÖNIG, J. R. THOMPSON, 2008 Biostatistical aspects of genome-wide association studies. Biometrical J. 50: 8-28.