Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance given erroneous inbred relationships

Crop Science

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 862-866

  Bernardo, Rex ^a  

^a Limagrain Genetics ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0029911168     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040007x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ajmone-Marsan, P., C. Livini, M.M. Messmer, A.E. Melchinger, and M. Motto. 1992. Cluster analysis of RFLP data from related maize inbred lines of the BSSS and LSC heterotic groups and comparison with pedigree data. Euphytica 60:139-148.
2. Bailey, T.B., Jr., and R.E. Comstock. 1976. Linkage and the synthesis of better genotypes in self-fertilizing species. Crop Sci. 16:363-370.
3. Bernardo, R. 1992. Retention of genetically superior lines during early-generation testcrossing of maize. Crop Sci. 32:933-937.
4. Bernardo, R. 1993. Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85:1055-1062.
5. Bernardo, R. 1994. Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci. 34: 20-25.
6. Bernardo, R. 1995. Genetic models for predicting maize single-cross performance in unbalanced yield trial data. Crop Sci. 35:141-147.
7. Bernardo, R. 1996a. Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci. 36:50-56.
8. Bernardo, R. 1996b. Best linear unbiased prediction of the performance of crosses between untested maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 36: 872-876 (this issue).
9. Carmer, S.G., W.M. Walker, and R.D. Seif. 1969. Practical suggestions on pooling variances for F tests of treatment effects. Agron. J. 61:334-336.
10. Emik, L.O., and C.E. Terrill. 1949. Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered. 40:51-55.
11. Hallauer, A.R. 1990. Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 35:1-16.
12. Henderson, C.R. 1985. Best linear unbiased prediction of nonadditive genetic merits in noninbred populations. J. Anim. Sci. 60:111-117.
13. Ho, Y.T., and R.E. Comstock. 1980. Combining superior alleles from two homozygous populations in a cross-fertilizing species. Genet. Res. 36:277-287.
14. Hunter, R.B. 1989. ASTA approach on minimum distance. p.193-195. In D. Wilkinson (ed.) Proc. 44th Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf., Chicago, IL. 6-7 Dec. 1989. Am. Seed Trade Assoc., Washington, DC.
15. 2 lines from a maize population. Maydica 34:5-14.
16. Kimura, M. 1957. Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. Ann. Math. Stat. 28:882-901.
17. Malécot, G. 1948. Les mathémathiques de l'hérédité. Masson et Cie, Paris.
18. Melchinger, A.E., M.M. Messmer, M. Lee, W.L. Woodman, and K.R. Lamkey. 1991. Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci. 31:669-678.
19. Russell, W.A. 1986. Contribution of breeding to maize improvement in the United States, 1920's-1980's. Iowa State J. Res. 61:5-34.
20. Stuber, C.W., and C.C. Cockerham. 1966. Gene effects and variances in hybrid populations. Genetics 54:1279-1286.
21. Van Vleck, L.D. 1970a. Misidentification in estimating the paternal sib correlation. J. Dairy Sci. 53:1469-1475.
22. Van Vleck, L.D. 1970b. Misidentification and sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 53:1697-1702.