Prediction of single-cross hybrid performance for grain yield and grain dry matter content in maize using AFLP markers associated with QTL

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1037-1047

  Schrag, T A ^a   Melchinger, A E ^a   Sorensen A P ^b   Frisch, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b KEYGENE N V   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERAL COMBINING ABILITY (GCA); MOLECULAR MARKER; PREDICTION EFFICIENCY; SPECIFIC COMBINING ABILITY (SCA);

BIOMARKERS; CROPS; ENZYME KINETICS;

GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT);

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMASS; CROSS BREEDING; EVALUATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HYBRIDIZATION; MAIZE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

BIOMASS; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; ZEA MAYS;

ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; FARM CROPS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33749157371     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-006-0363-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bernardo R (1994) Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 34:20-25
2. Bernardo R (1996) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci 36:50-56
3. Bernardo R (1998) Predicting the performance of untested single crosses: trait and marker data. In: Lamkey KR, Staub JE (eds) Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 117-127
4. Bernardo R (1999) Marker-assisted best linear unbiased prediction of single-cross performance. Crop Sci 39:1277-1282
5. Butler D, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2004) Spatial analysis mixed models for S language environments: samm reference manual. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane
6. Charcosset A, Essioux L (1994) The effect of population-structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor Appl Genet 89:336-343
7. Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs. Wiley, New York
8. Cockerham CC (1967) Prediction of double crosses from single crosses. Der Züchter 37:160-169
9. Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1952) Estimation of average dominance of genes. In: Gowen JW (eds) Heterosis. ISU Press, Ames, pp 494-516
10. Dhillon BS, Gurrath PA, Zimmer E, Wermke M, Pollmer WG, Klein D (1990) Analysis of diallel crosses of maize for variation and covariation in agronomic traits at silage and grain harvests. Maydica 35:297-302
11. Fehr WR (1987) Principles of cultivar development, vol 1. theory and technique. Macmillan Publishing, New York
12. Gardner CO, Eberhart SA (1966) Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22:439-452
13. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2002) ASReml user guide. Release 1.0. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead
14. Hallauer AR (1990) Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 35:1-16
15. Knapp SJ, Bridges WC (1987) Confidence interval estimators for heritability for several mating and experiment designs. Theor Appl Genet 73:759-763
16. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583-621
17. Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA-CSSA, Madison, pp 99-118
18. Melchinger AE, Geiger HH, Seitz G, Schmidt GA (1987) Optimum prediction of three-way crosses from single crosses in forage maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 74:339-345
19. Peleman J, van Wijk R, Van Oeveren J, Van Schaik R (2000) Linkage map integration: an integrated genetic map of Zea mays L. In: Proceedings of plant and animal genome conference VIII, San Diego, 9-12 Jan 2000. Poster P472
20. Reif JC, Hallauer AR, Melchinger AE (2005) Heterosis and heterotic patterns in maize. Maydica 50:215-223
21. Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2005) The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J Agric Sci 143:1-14
22. Smith OS (1986) Covariance between line per se and testcross performance. Crop Sci 26:540-543
23. Utz HF (2003) PLABSTAT - a computer program for statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. Version 3A. University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart
24. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP - a new technique for DNA-fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407-4414
25. Vuylsteke M, Kuiper M, Stam P (2000a) Chromosomal regions involved in hybrid performance and heterosis: their AFLP (R)-based identification and practical use in prediction models. Heredity 85:208-218
26. Vuylsteke M, Mank R, Antonise R, Bastiaans E, Senior ML, Stuber CW, Melchinger AE, Lübberstedt T, Xia XC, Stam P, Zabeau M, Kuiper M (1999) Two high-density AFLP (R) linkage maps of Zea mays L.: analysis of distribution of AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 99:921-935
27. Vuylsteke M, Mank R, Brugmans B, Stam P, Kuiper M (2000b) Further characterization of AFLP (R) data as a tool in genetic diversity assessments among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Mol Breed 6:265-276