Genetic distances revealed by morphological characters, isozymes, proteins and RAPD markers and their relationships with hybrid performance in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 511-518

  Yu, C Y ^a   Hu, S W ^a   Zhao, H X ^a   Guo, A G ^a   Sun, G L ^b  

^a NORTHWEST A F UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; DNA; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MORPHOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY); PROTEINS;

GENETIC DISTANCES (GD); HETEROZYGOSITY; ISOZYMES; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNAS (RAPD);

OILS AND FATS;

BRASSICA NAPUS; SINAPIS ARVENSIS;

ISOENZYME; PRIMER DNA; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; CHINA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HETEROSIS; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; RAPESEED;

BRASSICA NAPUS; BREEDING; CHINA; CROSSES, GENETIC; DNA PRIMERS; GENETIC MARKERS; HYBRID VIGOR; ISOENZYMES; PLANT PROTEINS; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; SEEDS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 16244405895     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1858-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ali M, Copeland LO, Elias SG (1995) Relationship between genetic distance and heterosis for yield and morphological traits in winter canola (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet 91:118-121
2. Betran FJ, Ribaut JM, Beck D, de Leon DG (2003) Genetic diversity, specific combining ability, and heterosis in tropical maize under stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci 43:797-806
3. Cerna FJ, Cianzio SR, Rafalski A, Tingey S, Dyer D (1997) Relationship between seed yield heterosis and molecular marker heterozygosity in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 95:460-467
4. Cheres MT, Miller JF, Crane JM, Knapp SJ (2000) Genetic distance as a predictor of heterosis and hybrid performance within and between heterotic groups in sunflower. Theor Appl Genet 100:889-894
5. Corbellini M, Perenzin M, Accerbi M, Vaccino P, Borghi B (2002) Genetic diversity in bread wheat, as revealed by coefficient of parentage and molecular markers, and its relationship to hybrid performance. Euphytica 123:273-285
6. Dier BW, McVetty PB, Osborn TC (1996) Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on restriction fragment length polymorphism marker in oilseed (Brassica napus L.). Crop Sci 36:79-83
7. Duley JW, Saghai MA (1991) Molecular marker and grouping of parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci 31:718-723
8. Frei OM, Stuber CW, Goodman MM (1986) Use of allozymes as genetic markers for predicting performance in maize single cross hybrids. Crop Sci 26:37-42
9. Gan L, Wang X (1999) Genetic diversity analysis of rapeseed for the storage protein. J Huazhong Agric Univ 18:528-532
10. Goldshalk EB, Lee M, Lamkey KR (1990) Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single-cross hybrid performance in maize. Theor Appl Genet 80:273-280
11. Graham GI, Wolff DW, Stuber CW (1997) Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci 37:1601-1610
12. Griffing B, Linstrom EW (1954) A study of the combining ability of corn inbreds having varying proportions of corn belt and non-corn belt germplasm. Agronomy J 46: 545-552
13. He GH, Hou L, Li DM, Luo XY, Niu GQ, Tang M, Pei Y (2002) Prediction of yield and yield components in hybrid rice by using molecular marker. Acta Genet Sin 29:438-444
14. Hu SW, Ovesna J, Kucera L, Kucera V, Vyvadislava M (2003) Evaluation of genetic diversity of Brassica napus germplasm from China and Europe assessed by RAPD markers. Plant Soil Environ 49:106-113
15. Hua JP, Xing YZ, Xu CG, Sun XL, Yu SB, Zhang QF (2002) Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 162:1885-1895
16. Jordan D, Tao Y, Godwin I, Henzell R, Cooper M, McIntyre C (2003) Prediction of hybrid performance in grain sorghum using RFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 106:559-567
17. Lefort-Buson M, Guillot-Lemoine, Dattee Y (1989) Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L): crosses between European and Asiatic selfed lines. Genome 29:413-418
18. Li DR (1986) Success in and larger-scale extension of the breeding of male sterile line, maintenance line and restorer line in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Sci Agric Sin 19:94
19. Liu R, Qian W, Meng J (2002) Association of RFLP markers and biomass heterosis in trigenomic hybrids of oilseed rape (Brassica napus x B. campestris). Theor Appl Genet 105: 1050-1057
20. Martin JM, Talbert LE, Lanning SP, Black NK (1995) Hybrid performance in wheat related to parental diversity. Crop Sci 35:104-108
21. Morice M (1979) Heterosis and genetic parameters in winter rape (Brassica napus L). In: Proc 5th Int Rapeseed Cong. GCIRC 1:36-47
22. Nei M, Li W (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 6:5269-5273
23. Qian SG, Zheng YL, Yan Y, Liu JL (1999) Polymorphism of 8 allozymes at 17 loci from maize synthesized populations and correlated with quantitative traits. Acta Agron Sin 25:759-765
24. Riaz A, Li G, Quresh Z, Swatt MS, Quiros CF (2001) Genetic diversity of oilseed Brassica inbred lines based on sequence-related amplified polymorphism and its relation to hybrid performance. Plant Breed 120:411-415
25. Schwartz D (1960) Genetic studies on mutant enzymes in maize: synthesis of hybrid enzymes by heterozygotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 46:1210-1215
26. Sernyk JL, Stefansson BR (1983) Heterosis in summer rape (Brassica napus L.). Can J Plant Sci 63:407-413
27. Sheng JX, Lu GY, Fu TD, Yang GS (2002) Relationships between genetic diversity and hybrid performance in Oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Acta Agron Sin 28:622-627
28. Shieh GJ, Thseng FS (2002) Genetic diversity of Tainan-white maize inbred lines and prediction of single cross hybrid performances using RAPD markers. Euphytica 124:307-313
29. 1 grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80:833-840
30. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. WH Freeman, San Francisco
31. SPSS (1999) SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) 10.0 for Windows http://www.spss.com/spss, Chicago, Ill.
32. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentijars T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823-839
33. Sun QX, Wu LM, Ni ZF, Meng FR, Wang ZK, Lin Z (2004) Differential gene expression patterns in leaves between hybrids and their parental inbreds are correlated with heterosis in a wheat diallel cross. Plant Sci 166:651-657
34. Vallejos CE (1988) Enzyme activity staining. In: Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds) Isozymes in plant genetic and breeding. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 469-516
35. Xiao JH, Li JM, Yuan LP, Tanksley SD (1995) Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as released by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140:745-754
36. Zhang QF, Zhou ZQ, Yang GP, Xu CG, Liu KD, Saghai Maroof MA (1996) Molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance in indica and japonica rice. Theor Appl Genet 93:1218-1224