Illusory displacement due to object substituion near the consciousness threshold

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Sigman, Mariano ^a,b   Sackur, Jérôme ^b,c   Del Cul, Antoine ^a   Dehaene, Stanislas ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^d Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie   (France)

Author keywords

Binding; Feature inheritance; Gestalt; Illusory conjunction; Masking; Object substitution; Surface; Top down; Visual illusion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMAN; ILLUSION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 38349193393     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.1.13     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R., & Maddox, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
2. Bachmann, T. (1994). Psychophysiology of visual masking: The fine structure of conscious experience. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
3. Bakin, J. S., Nakayama, K., & Gilbert, C. D. (2000). Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8188-8198.
4. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bridgeman, B. (1971). Metacontrast and lateral inhibition. Psychological Review, 78, 528-539.
6. Coppola, D. M., Purves, H. R., McCoy, A. N., & Purves, D. (1998). The distribution of oriented contours in the real world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 4002-4006.
7. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
8. Didner, R., & Sperling, G. (1980). Perceptual delay: A consequence of metacontrast and apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 235-243.
9. Enns, J. T. (2002). Visual binding in the standing wave illusion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 489-496.
10. Ganz, L. (1975). Temporal factors in visual perception. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (pp. 169-231). New York: Academic Press.
11. Gilbert, C. D., & Sigman, M., (2007). Brain states: Top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron, 54, 677-696.
12. Gilbert, C. D., Sigman, M., & Crist, R. E. (2001). The neural basis of perceptual learning. Neuron, 31, 681-697.
13. Hazeltine, R. E., Prinzmetal, W., & Elliott, W. (1997). If it's not there, where is it? Locating illusory, conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 263-277.
14. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334-337.
15. Helmholtz, H. V., (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.
16. Herzog, M. H., Fable, M., & Koch, C. (2001). Spatial aspects of object formation revealed by a new illusion, shine-through. Vision Research, 41, 2325-2335.
17. Herzog, M. H., & Koch, C. (2001). Seeing properties of an invisible object: Feature inheritance and shine-through. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 4271-4275.
18. Herzog, M. H., Koch, C., & Fahle,. M. (2001). Shine-through: Temporal aspects. Vision Research, 41, 2337-2346.
19. Howe, C., & Purves, D. (2005). Perceiving geometry: Geometrical illusions explained in terms of natural scene statistics. New York: Springer.
20. Jehee, J. F., Roelfsema, P. R., Deco, G., Murre, J. M., & Lamme, V. A. (2007). Interactions between higher and lower visual areas improve shape selectivity of higher level neurons-explaining crowding phenomena. Brain Research, 1157, 167-176.
21. Lappe, M., Awater, H., & Krekelberg, B. (2000). Postsaccadic visual references generate presaccadic compression of space. Nature, 403, 892-895.
22. Maddox, W. T., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R. B., & Ashby, F. G. (1994). A probabilistic multidimensional model of location information. Psychological Research, 56, 66-77.
23. Mewhort, D. J., Huntley, M. F., & Duff-Fraser, H. (1993). Masking disrupts recovery of location information. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 759-762.
24. Morrone; M. C., Ross, J., & Burr, D. (2005). Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 950-954.
25. Motter, B. C. (1993). Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas VI, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 909-919.
26. Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (1990). Towards a neural understanding of visual surface representation. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 55, 911-924.
27. Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (1992). Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science, 257, 1357-1363.
28. Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
29. Prinzmetal, W. (1981). Principles of feature integration in visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 330-340.
30. Prinzmetal, W. (1995). Visual feature integration in a world of objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 90-94.
31. Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D. E., & Posner, M. I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 361-369.
32. Ross, J., Morrone, M. C., Goldberg, M. E., & Burr, D. C. (2001). Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 113-121.
33. Sheliga, B. M., Riggio, L., Craighero, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Spatial attention-determined modifications in saccade trajectories. Neuroreport, 6, 585-588.
34. Sheliga, B. M., Riggio, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1994). Orienting of attention and eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 507-522.
35. Sheliga, B. M., Riggio, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Spatial attention and eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 105, 261-275.
36. Shimojo, S., Karnitani, Y., & Nishida, S. (2001): After-image of perceptually filled-in surface. Science, 293, 1677-1680.
37. Sigman, M., Cecchi, G. A., Gilbert, C. D., & Magnasco, M. O. (2001). On a common circle: Natural scenes and Gestalt rules. Proceedings of the National of Academy of Sciences of the United States on America, 98, 1935-1940.
38. Sigman, M., & Gilbert, C. D. (2000). Learning to find a shape. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 264-269.
39. Sigman, M., Pan, H., Yang, Y., Stem, E., Silbersweig, D., & Gilbert, C. D. (2005). Top-down reorganization of activity in the visual pathway after learning a shape identification task. Neuron, 46, 823-835.
40. Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: An attentional repulsion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 443-463.
41. Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1998). A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1315-1341.
42. Toet, A., & Levi, D. M. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32, 1349-1357.
43. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
44. Tripathy, S. P., & Cavanagh, P. (2002). The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size. Vision Research, 42, 2357-2369.
45. Watanabe, K., Nijhawan, R., & Shimojo, S. (2002). Shifts in perceived position of flashed stimuli by illusory object motion. Vision Research, 42, 2645-2650.
46. Wertheimer, M. (1938). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. London: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovitch.
47. Wolford, G., & Shum, K. H. (1980). Evidence for feature perturbations. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 409-420.