Improvement in protein functional site prediction by distinguishing structural and functional constraints on protein family evolution using computational design

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 33, Issue 18, 2005, Pages 5861-5867

  Cheng, Gong ^a,b   Qian, Bin ^a,b   Samudrala, Ram ^b   Baker, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY TRANSFER; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; EVALUATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID; ENZYME; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; ENZYMES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 27144551715     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki894     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Taylor,W.R. (1986) The classification of amino acid conservation. J. Theor. Biol., 119, 205-218.
2. Schneider,T.D. (1997) Information content of individual genetic sequences. J. Theor. Biol., 189, 427-441.
3. Lichtarge,O., Bourne,H.R. and Cohen,F.E. (1996) An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol., 257, 342-358.
4. Valdar,W.S. (2002) Scoring residue conservation. Proteins, 48, 227-241.
5. Ondrechen,M.J., Clifton,J.G. and Ringe,D. (2001) THEMATICS: A simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 12473-12478.
6. Madabushi,S., Yao,H., Marsh,M., Kristensen,D.M., Philippi,A., Sowa,M.E. and Lichtarge,O. (2002) Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 316, 139-154.
7. Laskowski,R.A., Luscombe,N.M., Swindells,M.B. and Thornton,J.M. (1996) Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci., 5, 2438-2452.
8. Jones,S. and Thornton,J.M. (2004) Searching for functional sites in protein structures. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 8, 3-7.
9. Armon,A., Graur,D. and Ben-Tal,N. (2001) ConSurf: An algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. J. Mol. Biol., 307, 447-463.
10. Wang,K. and Samudrala,R. (2005) FSSA: A novel method for identifying functional signatures from structural alignments. Bioinformatics, 21, 2969-2977.
11. Guerois,R., Nielsen,J.E. and Serrano,L. (2002) Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol., 320, 369-387.
12. Kortemme,T. and Baker,D. (2002) A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 14116-14121.
13. Kuhlman,B. and Baker,D. (2000) Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 10383-10388.
14. Dahiyat,B.I. and Mayo,S.L. (1997) De novo protein design: Fully automated sequence selection. Science, 278, 82-87.
15. Kuhlman,B., Dantas,G., Ireton,G.C., Varani,G., Stoddard,B.L. and Baker,D. (2003) Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science, 302, 1364-1368.
16. Looger,L.L., Dwyer,M.A., Smith,J.J. and Hellinga,H.W. (2003) Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature, 423, 185-190.
17. Pei,J., Dokholyan,N.V., Shakhnovich,E.I. and Grishin,N.V. (2003) Using protein design for homology detection and active site searches. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 11361-11366.
18. Elcock,A.H. (2001) Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computed energetics of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol., 312, 885-896.
19. Chelliah,V., Chen,L., Blundell,T.L. and Lovell,S.C. (2004) Distinguishing structural and functional restraints in evolution in order to identify interaction sites. J. Mol. Biol., 342, 1487-1504.
20. Shoichet,B.K., Baase,W.A., Kuroki,R. and Matthews,B.W. (1995) A relationship between protein stability and protein function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 452-456.
21. Beadle,B.M. and Shoichet,B.K. (2002) Structural bases of stability-function tradeoffs in enzymes. J. Mol. Biol., 321, 285-296.
22. Porter,C.T., Bartlett G.J. and Thornton,J.M. (2004) The catalytic site atlas: A resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D129-133.
23. Benson,D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi,I., Lipman,D.J., Ostell,J. and Wheeler,D.L. (2005) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D34-38.
24. Edgar,R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 113.
25. DeLano,W.L. (2002) The PyMOL User's Manual. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA.
26. Valdar,W.S. and Thornton,J.M. (2001) Protein-protein interfaces: analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers. Proteins, 42, 108-124.
27. Gutteridge,A., Bartlett,G.J. and Thornton,J.M. (2003) Using a neural network and spatial clustering to predict the location of active sites in enzymes. J. Mol. Biol., 330, 719-734.
28. Landgraf,R., Xenarios,I. and Eisenberg,D. (2001) Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 307, 1487-1502.