Systemic properties of metabolic networks lead to an epistasis-based model for heterosis

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 463-473

  Fiévet, Julie B ^a   Dillmann, Christine ^b   de Vienne, Dominique ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; METABOLISM;

BIOCHEMICAL MODEL; ENZYME CONCENTRATIONS; EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; KINETIC BEHAVIOUR; MOLECULAR APPROACH; MULTI DIMENSIONAL; SEVERAL VARIABLES;

ENZYMES;

EID: 75849134264     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1203-2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bateson W, Saunders ER, Punnett RC, Hurst CC (1905) Reports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society, Report II (Harrison and Sons, London).
2. Bayne BL, Hawkins AJ (1997) Protein metabolism, the costs of growth, and genomic heterozygosity: experiments with the Mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk. Physiol Biochem Zool 70: 391-402.
3. Bulfield G, Moore EA, Kacser H (1978) Genetic variation in activity of the enzymes of glycolysis and gluconeogenesis between inbred strains of mice. Genetics 89: 551-561.
4. Cronwright GR, Rohwer JM, Prior BA (2002) Metabolic control analysis of glycerol synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 4448-4456.
5. Danzmann RG, Ferguson MM, Allendorf FW (1987) Heterozygosity and oxygen-consumption rate as predictors of growth and developmental rate in rainbow trout. Physiol Zool 60: 211-220.
6. Desai MM, Weissman D, Feldman MW (2007) Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis. Genetics 177: 1001-1010.
7. Dooner HK, Robbins TP, Jorgensen RA (1991) Genetic and developmental control of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Gene 25: 173-199.
8. Eanes W, Katona L, Longtime M (1990) Comparison of in vitro and in vivo activities associated with the g6pd allozyme polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 125: 845-853.
9. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1996) Less-than-additive epistatic interactions of quantitative trait loci in tomato. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
10. Fell DA (1992) Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental background. Biochem J 286: 313-330.
11. Fell DA (1997) Understanding the control of metabolism. Portland Press, London.
12. Fiévet J, Dillmann C, Lagniel G, Davanture M, Négroni L, Labarre J, de Vienne D (2004) Assessing factors for reliable quantitative proteomics based on two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 4: 1939-1949.
13. Fiévet JB, Dillmann C, Curien G, de Vienne D (2006) Simplified modelling of metabolic pathways for flux prediction and optimization: lessons from an in vitro reconstruction of the upper part of glycolysis. Biochem J 396: 317-326.
14. Hayman BI, Mather K (1955) The description of genetic interactions in continuous variation. Biometrics 11: 69-82.
15. Heinrich R, Rapoport TA (1974) A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. Eur J Biochem 42: 89-95.
16. Hoecker N, Lamkemeyer T, Sarholz B et al (2008) Analysis of nonadditive protein accumulation in young primary roots of a maize (Zea mays L) F(1)-hybrid compared to its parental inbred lines. Proteomics 8: 3882-3894.
17. Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S, Zhang Q (2003) Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 2574-2579.
18. Kacser H, Burns JA (1973) The control of flux. Symp Soc Exp Biol 27: 65-104.
19. Kacser H, Burns JA (1981) The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97: 639-666.
20. Keightley P (1996) Metabolic models of selection response. J Theor Biol 182: 311-316.
21. Koebmann B, Solem C, Jensen PR (2005) Control analysis as a tool to understand the formation of the las operon in Lactococcus lactis. FEBS J 272: 2292-2303.
22. Koehn RK (1991) The cost of enzyme synthesis in the genetics of energy balance and physiological performance. Biol J Linn Soc 44: 231-247.
23. Kollipara KP, Saab IN, Wych RD, Lauer MJ, Singletary GW (2002) Expression profiling of reciprocal maize hybrids divergent for cold germination and desiccation tolerance. Plant Physiol 129: 974-992.
24. Leonardi A, Damerval C, Gallais A, de Vienne D (1991) Association of protein amount polymorphism (PAP) among Maize lines with performance of their hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 82: 552-560.
25. Lion S, Gabriel F, Bost B, Fiévet J, Dillmann C, de Vienne D (2004) An extension to the metabolic control theory taking into account correlations between enzyme concentrations. Eur J Biochem 271: 4375-4391.
26. Maisnier-Patin S, Roth JR, Fredriksson A, Nyström T, Berg OG, Andersson DI (2005) Genomic buffering mitigates the effects of deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nat Genet 37: 1376-1379.
27. Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Piepho HP, Zeng ZB, Schön CC (2007) The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: a systems-oriented approach. Genetics 177: 1815-1825.
28. Meyer RC, Kusterer B, Lisec J, Steinfath M, Becher M, Scharr H, Melchinger AE, Selbig J, Schurr U, Willmitzer L, Altmann T (2009) QTL analysis of early stage heterosis for biomass in Arabidopsis. Theor Appl Genet (this issue).
29. Ming R, Liu SC, Moore PH, Irvine JE, Paterson AH (2001) QTL analysis in a complex autopolyploid: genetic control of sugar content in sugarcane. Genome Res 11: 2075-2084.
30. Niederberger P, Prasad R, Miozzari G, Kacser H (1992) A strategy for increasing an in vivo flux by genetic manipulations. The tryptophan system of yeast. Biochem J 287: 473-479.
31. Paschold A, Marcon C, Hoecker N, Hochholdinger F (2009) Molecular dissection of heterosis manifestation during early maize root development. Theor Appl Genet (this issue).
32. Pettersson G (1989) Effect of evolution on the kinetic properties of enzymes. Eur J Biochem 184: 561-566.
33. Phillips PC (2008) Epistasis-the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat Rev Genet 9: 855-867.
34. Redden R (1991) The effect of epistasis on chromosome mapping of quantitative characters in wheat. I. Time to spike emergence. Aust J Agric Res 42: 1-11.
35. Rossignol R, Faustin B, Rocher C, Malgat M, Mazat JP, Letellier T (2003) Mitochondrial threshold effects. Biochem J 370: 751-762.
36. Shao H, Burrage LC, Sinasac DS, Hill AE, Ernest SR, O'Brien W, Courtland HW, Jepsen KJ, Kirby A, Kulbokas EJ, Daly MJ, Broman KW, Lander ES, Nadeau JH (2008) Genetic architecture of complex traits: large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 19910-19914.
37. Silander OK, Tenaillon O, Chao L (2007) Understanding the evolutionary fate of finite populations: the dynamics of mutational effects. PLoS Biol 5: e94.
38. Sinnott EW, Dunn LC (1939) Principles of genetics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New-York and London.
39. Tarun A, Lee J, Theologis A (1998) Random mutagenesis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase: a key enzyme in ethylene biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 9796-9801.
40. van Der Veen JH (1959) Tests of non-allelic interaction and linkage for quantitative characters in generations derived from two diploid pure lines. Genetica 30: 201-232.
41. Wright S (1934) Molecular and evolutionary theories of dominance. Am Nat 68: 24-53.
42. Yang RC (2004) Epistasis of quantitative trait loci under different gene action models. Genetics 167: 1493-1505.
43. Zeng ZB, Wang T, Zou W (2005) Modeling quantitative trait loci and interpretation of models. Genetics 169: 1711-1725.