Metabolic models of selection response

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 182, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 311-316

  Keightley, Peter D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMINANT INHERITANCE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EPISTASIS; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; METABOLISM; NATURAL SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0030574102     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0169     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BEAUMONT, M. A. (1988). Stabilizing selection and metabolism. Heredity 62, 433-438.
2. BULMER, M. G. (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. BURGER, R. & LANDE, R. (1994). On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance. Genetics 138, 901-912.
4. BURNS, J. A. (1971). Studies of complex systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
5. CLARK, A. G. (1991). Mutation-selection balance and metabolic control theory. Genetics 129, 909-923.
6. CLARK, A. G, WANG, L. & HULLEBERG, T. (1995). Spontaneous mutation rate of modifiers of metabolism in Drosophila. Genetics 139, 767-779.
7. CORNISH-BOWDEN, A. (1987). Dominance is not inevitable. J. theor. Biol. 125, 333-338.
8. DYKHUIZEN, D. E., DEAN, A. M. & HARTL, D. L. (1987). Metabolic flux and fitness. Genetics 115, 25-31.
9. ENDLER, J. A. (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. FALCONER, D. S. (1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd Edn. London: Longman.
11. FISHER, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52, 399-433.
12. KACSER, H. & BURNS, J. A. (1981). The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97, 639-666.
13. KEIGHTLEY, P. D. (1989). Models of quantitative variation of flux in metabolic pathways. Genetics 121, 869-876.
14. KEIGHTLEY, P. D. & HILL, W. G. (1988). Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection balance in finite populations. Genet. Res. 52, 33-43.
15. KEIGHTLEY, P. D. & KACSER, H. (1987). Dominance, pleiotropy and metabolic structure. Genetics 117, 319-329.
16. NIEDERBERGER, P., PRASAD, R., MIOZZARI, G., AND KACSER, H. (1992). A strategy for increasing an in vivo flux by genetic manipulations. Biochem. J. 287, 473-479.
17. SMALL, J. R. & KACSER, H. (1993). Responses of metabolites to large changes in enzyme activities and effectors. 1. The linear treatment of unbranched chains. Eur. J. Biochem. 213, 613-624.
18. SZATHMARY, E. (1993). Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer. Genetics 133, 127-132.
19. TURELLI, M. (1984). Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Pop. Biol. 25, 138-193.
20. TURELLI, M. & BARTON, N. H. (1994). Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what me normal? Genetics 138, 913-941.
21. WRIGHT, S. (1934). Molecular and evolutionary theories of dominance. Amer. Nat. 68, 24-53.