Molecular marker-based pedigrees for animal conservation biologists

Animal Conservation

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 26-34

  Jones, O R ^a   Wang, J ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Heritability; Microsatellites; Molecular methods; Relationships; Selection

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENE FLOW; HERITABILITY; KIN SELECTION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; POLYMORPHISM; SOFTWARE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 75649106875     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: 14691795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00324.x     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Abecasis G, Wigginton J. Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 77:754-767.
2. Akcay E, Roughgarden J. Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2007, 9:855-868.
3. Almudevar A. A graphical approach to relatedness inference. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2007, 71:213-229.
4. Anderson E, Garza J. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference. Genetics 2006, 172:2567-2582.
5. Bachtrog D, Weiss S, Zangerl B, Brem G, Schlotterer C. Distribution of dinucleotide microsatellites in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16:602-610.
6. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T. Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:3021-3031.
7. Barker M, Schluessel V. Managing global shark fisheries: suggestions for prioritizing management strategies. Aquat. Conserv. 2005, 15:325-347.
8. Bennett P. Microsatellites. J. Clin. Pathol. 2000, 53:177-183.
9. Bernatchez L, Duchesne P. Individual-based genotype analysis in studies of parentage and population assignment: how many loci, how many alleles? Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2000, 57:1-12.
10. Bink MCAM, Anderson AD, van de Weg WE, Thompson EA. Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 117:843-855.
11. Blackmore CJ, Heinsohn R. Variable mating strategies and incest avoidance in cooperatively breeding grey-crowned babblers. Anim. Behav. 2008, 75:63-70.
12. Boehnke M, Cox N. Accurate inference of relationships in sib-pair linkage studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997, 61:423-429.
13. Bonin A, Bellemain E, Eidesen P, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Taberlet P. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:3261-3273.
14. Buchan J, Archie E, Horn RV, Moss C, Alberts S. Locus effects and sources of error in noninvasive genotyping. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5:680-683.
15. Butler K, Field C, Herbinger C, Smith B. Accuracy, efficiency and robustness of four algorithms allowing full sibship reconstruction from DNA marker data. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:1589-1600.
16. Carpenter P, Pope L, Greig C, Dawson D, Rogers L, Erven K, Wilson G, Delahay R, Cheeseman C, Burke T. Mating system of the Eurasian badger, Meles meles, in a high density population. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:273-284.
17. van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E. A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10:1539-1549.
18. Charmantier A, Perrins C, McCleery R, Sheldon B. Age-dependent genetic variance in a life-history trait in the mute swan. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:225-232.
19. Charmantier A, Reale D. How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:2839-2850.
20. Charpentier M, Setchell J, Prugnolle F, Wickings E, Peignot P, Balloux F, Hossaert-Mickey M. Life history correlates of inbreeding depression in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:21-28.
21. Cohas A, Bonenfant C, Gaillard JM, Allaine D. Are extra-pair young better than within-pair young? A comparison of survival and dominance in alpine marmot. J. Anim. Ecol. 2007, 76:771-781.
22. Collevatti RG, Leite KCE, de Miranda GHB, Rodrigues FHG. Evidence of high inbreeding in a population of the endangered giant anteater, Myrmecophaga tridactyla (Myrmecophagidae), from Emas National Park, Brazil. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2007, 30:112-120.
23. Coltman DW. Testing marker-based estimates of heritability in the wild. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:2593-2599.
24. Coltman DW, Bancroft D, Robertson A, Smith J, CluttonâBrock TH, Pemberton JM. Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8:1199-1209.
25. Dakin E, Avise J. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 2004, 93:504-509.
26. DiBattista JD, Feldheim KA, Garant D, Gruber SH, Hendry AP. Evolutionary potential of a large marine vertebrate: quantitative genetic parameters in a wild population. Evolution 2009, 63:1051-1067.
27. Emery A, Wilson I, Craig S, Boyle P, Noble L. Assignment of paternity groups without access to parental genotypes: multiple mating and developmental plasticity in squid. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10:1265-1278.
28. Epstein M, Duren W, Boehnke M. Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 67:1219-1231.
29. Estoup A, Jarne P, Cornuet J. Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:1591-1604.
30. Fenberg PB, Roy K. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know? Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:209-220.
31. Garant D, Kruuk LEB. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:1843-1859.
32. Gasbarra D, Pirinen M, Sillanpää MJ, Arjas E. Estimating genealogies from linked marker data: a bayesian approach. BMC Bioinformatics 2007a, 8:411.
33. Gasbarra D, Pirinen M, Sillanpaa MJ, Salmela E, Arias E. Estimating genealogies from unlinked marker data: a Bayesian approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2007b, 72:305-322.
34. Glaubitz J, Rhodes O, Dewoody J. Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12:1039-1047.
35. Gomez-Uchida D, Banks M. Microsatellite analyses of spatial genetic structure in darkblotched rockfish (Sebastes crameri): is pooling samples safe? Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2005, 62:1874-1886.
36. Gottelli D, Wang J, Bashir S, Durant SM. Genetic analysis reveals promiscuity among female cheetahs. Proc. Roy. Soc Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:1993-2001.
37. Hadfield JD, Richardson DS, Burke T. Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:3715-3730.
38. Hoffman J, Amos W. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:599-612.
39. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL. Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA. Nature 1985, 316:76-79.
40. Kalinowski S. Do polymorphic loci require large sample sizes to estimate genetic distances? Heredity 2005, 94:33-36.
41. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1099-1106.
42. Kruuk LEB. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the 'animal model'. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 359:873-890.
43. Kwok P. Methods for genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2001, 2:235-258.
44. Lynch M, Ritland K. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 1999, 152:1753-1766.
45. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7:639-655.
46. Marth G, Yeh R, Minton M, Donaldson R, Li Q. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the public domain: how useful are they? Nat. Genet. 2001, 27:371-372.
47. McPeek M, Sun L. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 66:1076-1094.
48. Morin P, Luikart G, Wayne R. SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:208-216.
49. Neff B, Repka J, Gross M. A Bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2001, 59:315-331.
50. Nielsen RK, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V. Genetic evaluation of the captive breeding program of the Persian wild ass. J. Zool. (Lond.) 2007, 272:349-357.
51. Olsen E, Heino M, Lilly G, Morgan M, Brattey J, Ernande B, Dieckmann U. Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature 2004, 428:932-935.
52. Pemberton JM. Wild pedigrees: the way forward. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 275:613-621.
53. Ranade K, Chang M, Ting C, Pei D, Hsiao C, Olivier M, Pesich R, Hebert J, Chen Y, Dzau V, Curb D, Olshen R, Risch N, Cox D, Botstein D. High-throughput genotyping with single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genome Res. 2001, 11:1262-1268.
54. R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2008, R Development Core Team, Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing
55. Richard M, Losdat S, Lecomte J, Fraipont MD, Clobert J. Optimal level of inbreeding in the common lizard. Proc Roy. Soc Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:2779-2786.
56. Ritland K. Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:1195-1204.
57. Selkoe K, Toonen R. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:615-629.
58. Slate J, Gratten J, Beraldi D, Stapley J, Hale M, Pemberton JM. Gene mapping in the wild with snps: guidelines and future directions. Genetica 2009, 136:97-107.
59. Smith B, Herbinger C, Merry H. Accurate partition of individuals into full-sib families from genetic data without parental information. Genetics 2001, 158:1329-1338.
60. Soulsbury CD, Iossa G, Edwards KJ, Baker PJ, Harris SA. Allelic dropout from a high-quality DNA source. Conserv. Genet. 2007, 8:733-738.
61. Thomas S, Hill WG. Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data. Genetics 2000, 155:1961-1972.
62. Thomas SC, Hill WG. Sibship reconstruction in hierarchical population structures using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Genet. Res. 2002, 79:227-234.
63. Thompson E. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1975, 39:179-188.
64. Wang J. An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 2002, 160:1203-1215.
65. Wang J. Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 2004, 166:1963-1979.
66. Wang J. Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2006, 70:300-321.
67. Wang J, Santure A. Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy. Genetics 2009, 181:1579-1594.
68. Zeyl E, Aars J, Ehrich D, Wiig O. Families in space: relatedness in the Barents Sea population of polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:735-749.