Stakeholder mapping as an assessment framework for policy implementation

Evaluation

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 427-444

  Mehrizi, Mohammad Hosein Rezazade ^a   Ghasemzadeh, Fereidoun ^a   Molas Gallart, Jordi ^b  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b INGENIO CSIC UPV Technical University of Valencia   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ex ante policy evaluation; Programme evaluation; Stakeholder analysis; Stakeholder mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 75649099414     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389009341731     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arnold, E. (2004) Evaluating Research and Innovation Policy: A Systems World Needs Systems Evaluations, Research Evaluation 13: 3-17.
2. Bereaux, E. (2008) The Complete Guide to Project Management for New Managers and Management Assistants: How to Get Things Done in Less Time. Ocala, FL: Atlantic Publishing Co.
3. Beywl, W. and P. Potter (1998) RENOMO - A Design Tool for Evaluations: Designing Evaluations REsponsive to Stakeholders' Interests by Working with NOminal Groups using the MOderation Method, Evaluation 4: 53-71.
4. Brinkerhoff, D.W. (1991) Improving Development Program Performance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
5. Brugha, R. and Z. Varvasovszky (2000) Stakeholder Analysis: A Review, Health Policy and Planning 15: 239-46.
6. Carlsson, L. (2000) Non-Hierarchical Evaluation of Policy, Evaluation 6: 201-16.
7. Clark, T. and A. Evans (1997) Foundations of the Unified Modeling Language. Second Northern Formal Methods Workshop. Norwell, MA: Springer.
8. Crosby, B. (1992) Stakeholder Analysis: A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers. Washington, DC: USAID.
9. Currie, R.R., S. Seaton and F. Wesley (2009) 'Determining Stakeholders for Feasibility Analysis', Annals of Tourism Research 36: 41-63.
10. Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing.
11. Gardner, D.E. (1977) Five Evaluation Frameworks: Implications for Decision Making in Higher Education, Journal of Higher Education 48: 571-93.
12. Hansen, H.F. (2005) Choosing Evaluation Models: A Discussion on Evaluation Design, Evaluation 11: 447-62.
13. Hogwood, B.A.L.G. (1984) Policy Analysis for Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Honadle, G. and L. Cooper (1989) 'Beyond Coordination and Control: An Interorganizational Approach to Structural Adjustment, Service Delivery, and Natural Resource Management', World Development 17: 1531-41.
15. Hood, C. (1991) A Public Management for All Seasons?, Public Administration 69: 3-19.
16. Hood, C. (1994) Policy Reversals and How to Explain Them, in Hood (ed.) Explaining Economic Policy Reversals, pp. 1-18. Buckingham: Open University Press.
17. Julian, D.A., A. Jones and D. Devo (1995) Open Systems Evaluation and the Logic Model: Program Planning and Evaluation Tools, Evaluation and Program Planning 18: 333-41.
18. Kelvin, A. (2000) How Stakeholders with Various Preferences Converge on Acceptable Investment Programs, Evaluation and Program Planning 23: 105-13.
19. Kickert, W.J.M., E.-H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan (1997) Managing Complex Networks. London: Sage.
20. Kingdon, J. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
21. Kovács, A. (2004) Enhancing Procurement Practices: Comprehensive Approach to Acquiring Complex Facilities and Projects. Norwell, MA: Springer.
22. Lane, J.-E. (1997) Public Sector Reform in the Nordic Countries', in Lane (ed.) Public Sector Reform: Rationale, Trends and Problems, pp. 188-208. London: Sage.
23. Laurence, J. and J. O'Toole (2000) Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10: 263-88.
24. Lindenberg, M. and B. Crosby (1981) Managing Development: The Political Dimension. Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
25. Martin, S. and I. Sanderson (1999) Evaluating Public Policy Experiments: Measuring Outcomes, Monitoring Processes or Managing Pilots?, Evaluation 5: 245-58.
26. Mason, R.O. and I.I. Mitroff (1981) Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases, and Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Matland, R.E. (1995) Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5(2): 145-74.
28. Mohr, L.B. (1995) Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Molas-Gallart, J. and A. Davies (2006) Toward Theory-Led Evaluation: The Experience of European Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies, American Journal of Evaluation 27: 64-82.
30. Morgan, P. and S. Taschereau (1996) Capacity and Institutional Assessment: Frameworks, Methods and Tools for Analysis, prepared for CIDA Policy Branch, June 1996. Quebec: Canadian International Development Agency.
31. Munck, I.M.E. (1997) Bridging the Macro and Micro Levels in Outcome Evaluation, Evaluation 3: 320-44.
32. National-E-Commerce-Report (2005) The National Report on E-Commerce in Iran 2004. Tehran: Ministry of Commerce, Islamic Republic of Iran.
33. Pinto, R. and A.J. Mrope (1994) Projectizing the Governance Approach to Civil Service Reform: An Institutional Environment Assessment for Preparing a Sectoral Adjustment Loan in the Gambia. Africa Technical Department Series, Washington, DC: World Bank Discussion Papers.
34. Pinto, R. and A.J. Mrope (1995) 'Assessing Sector Institutions: Lessons of Experience from Zambia's Education Sector', discussion paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
35. Pollitt, C. (1993) Managerialism and the Public Services, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Prussia, G.E. and A.J. Kinicki (1996) A Motivational Investigation of Group Effectiveness Using Social-Cognitive Theory, Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 187-98.
37. Rametsteiner, E. and G. Weiss (2006a) Assessing Policies from a Systems Perspective: Experiences with Applied Innovation Systems Analysis and Implications for Policy Evaluation, Forest Policy and Economics 8: 564-76.
38. Rametsteiner, E. and G. Weiss (2006b) The Evaluation of Forest Policies and Programmes, Forest Policy and Economics 8: 564-76.
39. Richards, D. (2002) 'Public Policy in a Changing World', Governance and Public Policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Rossi, P.H., H. Freeman and M. Lipsey (1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. New York: Sage.
41. Sanderson, I., A.G. Bovaird, P. Davis, S.J. Martin and A. Foreman (1998) Made to Measure: Evaluation in Practice in Local Government. London: Local Government Management Board.
42. Scriven, M. (1981) Evaluation Thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Stefl, M.E. and S.L. Tucker (1994) Applying Stakeholder Analysis to Health Care Administration Education, Journal of Health Administration Education 12: 119-44.
44. Van der Meer, F.-B. and J. Edelenbos (2006) Evaluation in Multi-Actor Policy Processes: Accountability, Learning and Co-operation, Evaluation 12: 201-18.
45. Vedung, E. (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
46. Virtanen, P. and P. Uuslkyla (2004) Exploring the Missing Links between Cause and Effect: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Micro-Macro Conversions in Programme Evaluation, Evaluation 10: 77-91.
47. Walt, G. (1994) Can Interest Groups Influence Government Policy?: Health Policy. An Introd uction to Process and Power. London: Zed Publications.
48. Wegener, A. (1998) Evaluating Competitively Tendered Contracts: Local Governments in Comparative Perspective, Evaluation 4: 189-203.
49. Wigand, R. (1997) Electronic Commerce: Definition, Theory, and Context, The Information Society 13: 1-16.
50. Wilson, C. (2000) Policy Regimes and Policy Change, Journal of Public Policy 20: 247-74.