Renomo-a design tool for evaluations: Designing evaluations responsive to stakeholders' interests by working with nominal groups using the moderation method

Evaluation

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 53-71

  Beywl, Wolfgang ^a   Potter, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444458796     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13563899822208392     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AEA (1995) Guiding Principles for Evaluators, in W. R. Shadish (ed.) Guiding Principles for Evaluators. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bartunek, J. M. and J. K. Murninghan (1984) "The Nominal Group Technique: Expanding the Basic Procedure and Underlying Assumptions", Group and Organization Studies9(3): 417-432.
3. Beywl, W. (1988) Zur Weiterentwicklung der Evaluationsmethodologie. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
4. Carney, O., J. McIntosh and A. Worth (1996) "The Use of the Nominal Group Technique in Research with Community Nurses", Journal of Advanced Nursing23: 1024-1029.
5. Cohn, R. C. (1975) Von der Psychoanalyse zur Themenzentrieten Interaktion. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
6. Delbeq, A. L., A. Van de Ven and D. H. Gustafson (1975) Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi ProcessesGlenview: Scott Foresman.
7. Fetterman, D. M., S. J. Kaftarian and A. Wandersman (eds) (1995) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and AccountabilityThousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Frankel, S. (1987) "NGT 1 MDS: An Adaptation of the Nominal Group Technique for Ill-Structured Problems", Journal of Applied Behavioral Science23(4): 543-551.
9. Greene, J. G. (1988) "Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation", Evaluation Review2: 91-116.
10. Greene, J. C. (1994) "Qualitative Program Evaluation: Practice and Promise", in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1994) "Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research", in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
14. Heiner, M. (ed.) (1996) Qualitätsentwicklung durch Evaluation. Freiburg: Lambertus.
15. Klebert, K., E. Schrader and W. G. Straub (1985) Moderationsmethode. Hamburg: Windmühle.
16. Klebert, K., E. Schrader and W. G. Straub (1987) Kurzmoderation. Anwendung der Moderationsmethode in Betrieb, Schule und Hochschule, Kirche und Politik, Sozialbereich und Familie bei Besprechungen und Praesentationen. Hamburg: Windmühle.
17. Klebert, K., E. Schrader and W. G. Straub (1992) Winning Group Results: Techniques for Guiding Group Thought and Decision Making Processes with the Moderation Method. Hamburg: Windmühle.
18. Krueger, R. (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Löhmer, Cornelia and Rüdiger Standhardt (eds) (1992) TZI: Pädagogisch-therapeutische Gruppenarbeit nach Ruth C. Cohn. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
20. Nevis, E. (1987) Organizational Consulting: A Gestalt Perspective. Cleveland: Gèstalt Institute of Cleveland Press.
21. O"Neil, M. J. and L. Jackson (1983) "Nominal Group Technique: A Process for Initiating Curriculum Development in Higher Education", Studies in Higher Education8(2): 129-138.
22. Potter, P. (1997) "Responsive Evaluation als Katalysator für Selbst-Evaluationen", Informationen zur Selbst-Evaluation 2.
23. Schnelle, E. (1992) "Wie die Werkstatt des Wandels entstand" in Werkstatt des Wandels. Quickborn: Metaplan.
24. Schobert, B. (1997) Aufgabenorientierte Gruppentechniken-ein Vergleich der Nominal Group Technique und der Moderationsmethode. Köln: dissertation.
25. Scriven, M. (1996) "Evaluation-The State of the Art", Evaluation News and Comment5(2).
26. Shadish, W., T. Cook and L. C. Leviton (1991) Foundations of Program Evaluation. Theories of Practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Stake, R. (1975) Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
28. Van de Ven, A. and A. L. Delbeq (1971) "Nominal vs. Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness", Academy of Management Journal June: 203-12.
29. Wohlgemüth, A. C. (ed.) (1993) Moderation in Organizationen. Problemloesungsmethode fuer Führungsleute und BeraterBern: Haupt.
30. Wollmann, H. (1996) Begleitung und Bewertung in der EU Strukturfonds-Förderung-Möglichkeiten und GrenzenPaper presented at the European Conference on Evaluation Methods for Structural Funds Interventions. Berlin.