The advanced bionics high resolution mode: Stimulation rates up to 5000 pps

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 114-123

  Buechner, Andreas ^a   Frohne Bchner, Carolin ^a,b   Gaertner, Lutz ^a   Stoever, Timo ^a   Battmer, Rolf D ^a   Lenarz, Thomas ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b Advanced Bionics GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; High Resolution; M level; Rate optimization; Speech perception; Stimulation rate

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIONICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; NOISE; OTOSCLEROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SOFTWARE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75449117668     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016480902971239     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Zerbi M. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants. J Rehabil Res Dev 1993;/30:/110-6.
2. Loizou P. Mimicking the human ear. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 1998;/15:/101-30.
3. Loizou PC, Stickney G, Mishra L, Assmann P. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor. Ear Hear 2003;/24:/12-9.
4. Buechner A, Frohne-Buechner C, Gaertner L, Lesinski- Schiedat A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Evaluation of Advanced Bionics high resolution mode. Int J Audiol 2006;/45:/407-16.
5. Battmer RD, Buechner A, Boyle P, Frohne-Buechner C, Lenarz T. High Resolution Mode of the Advanced Bionics Cochlear Implant System: clinical investigation of stimulation rates up to 3000 pps. Cochlear Implants Int submitted.
6. Buechner A, Frohne-Buechner C, Stoever T, Gaertner L, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Comparison of a paired or sequential stimulation paradigm with advanced bionics' high-resolution mode. Otol Neurotol 2005;/26:/941-7.
7. Segel P, Voelkel A, Faltys M, Hartley L, Kessler D. The systematic evaluation of parameters in the fitting of High Resolution strategies in the Clarion Bionic Ear System. Presented at the Conference on Implantable Auditory Protheses, Asilomar, 2001.
8. Arnold L, Boyle P. Early results on high resolution (High Resolution Mode) programming with the Soundwave fitting software. Presented at the VII International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Related Audiological Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, 2003.
9. Javel E, Viemeister NF. Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;/107:/ 908-21.
10. Javel E, Shepherd RK. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear Res 2000;/140:/45-76.
11. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Zerbi M. Temporal representations with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;18(6 Suppl):S30-4.
12. Rubinstein JT Hong R Signal coding in cochlear implants: exploiting stochastic effects of electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2003;191:14-19.
13. Balkany T, Hodges A, Menapace C, Hazard L, Driscoll C, Gantz B, et al. Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:757-62.
14. Weber BP, Lai WK, Dillier N, von Wallenberg EL, Killian MJ, Pesch J, et al. Performance and preference for ACE stimulation rates obtained with nucleus RP 8 and freedom system. Ear Hear 2007;28(2 Suppl):46S-48S.
15. Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception. Ear Hear 2006;/27:/ 208-17.
16. Frijns JH, Klop WM, Bonnet RM, Briaire JJ. Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;/123:/ 138-42.
17. Loizou P, Poroy O, Dorman M. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;/108:/790-802.
18. Kiefer J, Ilberg C, Hubner-Egner J, Rupprecht V, Knecht R. Optimized speech understanding with the continuous interleaved sampling speech coding strategy in patients with cochlear implants: effect of variations in stimulation rate and number of channels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;/109:/1009-20.
19. Brendel M, Büchner A, Frohne-Büchner C, Gärtner L, Lenarz T. Evaluation der Möglichkeit zur Bestimmung der optimalen Stimulationsrate über die Lautheit im HiRes- System. Proceedings of the 8. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie, Göttingen, 2005, ISBN 3-9809869-4-2.
20. Büchner A, Frohne-Büchner C, Brendel M, Pilsak S, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Recording the neural response while stimulating with a high rate burst. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium and Workshops on Objective Measures in Cochlear Implants, Hannover, 1-4 June, 2005.