Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 136, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 757-762

  Balkany, Thomas ^a   Hodges, Annelle ^a   Menapace, Christine ^b   Hazard, Linda ^b   Driscoll, Colin ^c   Gantz, Bruce ^d   Kelsall, David ^e   Luxford, William ^f   McMenomy, Sean ^g   Neely, J Gail ^h   Peters, Brian ⁱ   Pillsbury, Harold ^j   Roberson, Joseph ^k   Schramm, David ^l   Telian, Steven ^m   Waltzman, Susan ⁿ   Westerberg, Brian ^o   Payne, Stacy ^p  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Department of Otolaryngology   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e Rocky Mountain Cancer Center   (United States)

^f HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ Dallas Otolaryngology Associates   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^k California Ear Institute   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^m UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

ⁿ NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^o ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^p NEMOURS CHILDREN S CLINIC   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CANADA; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORTH AMERICA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNITED STATES;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34247474757     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Balkany T.J., Hodges A.V., Eshraghi A.A., et al. Cochlear implants in children. Acta Otolaryngol 122 (2002) 356-362
2. Peterson F.E., and Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 27 (1962) 62-70
3. Boothroyd A., and Nittrouer S. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 84 (1988) 101-114
4. Nilsson M., Soli S.D., and Sullivan J. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95 (1994) 1085-1099
5. Parkinson A.J., et al. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: Adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 23 1 Suppl (2002) 41S-8
6. Nie K., Barco A., and Zeng F.G. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception. Ear Hear 27 (2006) 208-217
7. Friesen L.M., Shannon R.V., and Cruz R.J. Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 10 (2005) 169-184
8. Galvin J.J., and Fu Q.J. Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 6 (2005) 269-279