Optic nerve head changes in early glaucoma: A comparison between stereophotography and Heidelberg retina tomography

Eye

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 123-130

  Pablo, L E ^a   Ferreras, A ^a   Fogagnolo, P ^b   Figus, M ^c   Pajarin, A B ^d  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^d Sanitas Residencial   (Spain)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Glaucoma; Heidelberg retina tomograph; HRT; Optic disc; Stereophotographs

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLAUCOMA; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 75449092636     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2009.14     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Quigley HA. Neuronal death in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 1999; 18: 39-57.
2. American Academy of Ophthalmology Glaucoma Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern. Primary open-angle glaucoma. American Academy of Ophthalmology: San Francisco, CA, 2005, p3.
3. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, Mikelberg FS. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1730-1742.
4. Coops A, Henson DB, Kwartz AJ, Artes PH. Automated analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 5348-5355.
5. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 545-548.
6. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1557-1563.
7. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, Williams J, Blumenthal EZ, Sánchez-Galeana CA et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg retina tomograph, GDx nerve fiber analyzer, and optical coherence tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 985-993.
8. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 827-837.
9. Ferreras A, Pajarín AB, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Honrubia FM. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg retina tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 1981-1987.
10. Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumenee AE. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. II. Static screening criteria. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 1449-1454.
11. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies for diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 7-18.
12. Shunmugan M, Azuara-Blanco A. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 2317-2323.
13. Chylack Jr LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL et al. Longitudinal study of cataract study group. The lens opacities classification system III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 831-836.
14. Hodapp E, Parrish II RK, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. Mosby: St Louis, MO, 1993, pp 52-61.
15. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108: 130-135.
16. Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ. Initial glaucomatous optic disk and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 485-490.
17. Girkin CA. Principles of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for the clinician. In: Fingeret M, Flanagan JG, Liebmann JM (eds). The Essential HRT Primer. Heidelberg Engineering: Heidelberg, Germany, 2005, pp 1-9.
18. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, Graham SL, Drance SM, Gosine R. Ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1995; 4: 242-247.
19. Burk RO, Noack H, Rohrschneider K, Volcker HE. Prediction of glaucomatous visual fields defects by reference plane independent three-dimensional optic nerve head parameters. In: Wall M, Wild JM (eds). Perimetry Update 1998/99: Proceedings of the XIII International Perimetric Society Meeting Gardone Riviera (BS), 1998. Walter Kugler: The Hague, 1999. pp 463-474.
20. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Pajarín AB, Honrubia FM. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 775-781.
21. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839-843.
22. Garway-Heath DF, Friedman DS. How should results from clinical tests be integrated into the diagnostic process? Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1479-1480.
23. Radack KL, Rouan G, Hedges J. The likelihood ratio: an improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110: 689-693.
24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
25. Dewitte K, Fierens C, Stöckl D, Thienpont LM. Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of methodcomparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 799-801.
26. Oddone F, Centofanti M, Rossetti L, Iester M, Fogagnolo P, Capris E et al. Exploring the Heidelberg retinal tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1358-1365.
27. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma 1998; 7: 121-127.
28. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1008-1015.
29. Wagner RR, Beiden SV, Metz CE. Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations. Acad Radiol 2001; 8: 328-334.
30. Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 986.
31. Medeiros FA. How should diagnostic tests be evaluated in glaucoma? Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91: 273-274.
32. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Module. Operating Instructions Software Version 3.0. Heidelberg Engineering: Heidelberg, Germany, 2005.
33. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Pajarín AB, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Pueyo V. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3 for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 354-359.
34. Hertzog LH, Albrecht KG, LaBree L, Lee PP. Glaucoma care and conformance with preferred practice patterns: examination of the private, community-based ophthalmologist. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 1009-1013.
35. Shingleton BJ, Crandall A, Johnstone M, Robin A, Brown R. Medical treatment patterns of ASCRS members for primary open-angle glaucoma: 1998 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 118-127.
36. Fremont AM, Lee PP, Mangione CM, Kapur K, Adams JL, Wickstrom SL et al. Patterns of care for open-angle glaucoma in managed care. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 777-783.
37. American Academy of Ophthalmology Glaucoma Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern. Primary open-angle glaucoma. American Academy of Ophthalmology: San Francisco, CA, 2005, p 11.
38. Garway-Heath D, Ruben ST, Viswanathan A, Hitchings RA. Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 1118-1124.
39. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Fontana L, Hitchings RA. Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 2272-2277.
40. Bowd C, Zangwill L, Medeiros FA, Hao J, Chan K, Lee TW. et al. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereophotograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma-suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2255-2262.
41. Deleon-Ortega JE, Arthur SN, McGwin Jr G, Xie A, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 3374-3380.
42. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Vasile C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Agreement between stereophotographic and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy measurements of cup/disc ratio: effect on a predictive model for glaucoma development. J Glaucoma 2007; 16: 209-214.