Review of the German version of the "Revised NEO Personality Inventory by Costa and McCrae (NEO-PI-R)" by F. Ostendorf and A. Angleitner;Rezension des "NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae (NEO-PI-R)" von F. Ostendorf und A. Angleitner

Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 203-210

  Muck, Peter M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Five factor model; Job performance; Personality traits; Questionnaire translation

Indexed keywords

EID: 7544247068     PISSN: 09324089     EISSN: 21906270     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0932-4089.48.4.203     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Andresen, B. (2002). Hamburger Persönlichkeitsinventar (HPI). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
2. Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
3. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
4. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
5. Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6. Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1995a). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
7. Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1995b). Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 216-220.
8. Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R. & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887-898.
9. De Raad, B. (2000). The Big Five personality factors. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe.
10. Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V (Hrsg.). (2002). Anforderungen an Verfahren und deren Einsatz bei berufsbezogenen Eignungsbeurteilungen (DIN 33 430). Berlin: Beuth.
11. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
12. Hough, L. M. (1992). The "Big-Five" personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
13. Hough, L. M. (2001). I/Owes its advances to personality. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp.19-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Hough, L. M. & Schneider, R. J. (1996). Personality traits, taxonomies, and applications in organizations. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 31-88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Hurtz, G. M. & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
16. John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford.
17. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R. & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765-780.
18. McCrae, R. R. (2001). 5 years of progress: A reply to Block. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 108-113.
19. Mount, M. K. & Barrick, M. R. (1998). Five reasons why the "Big Five" article has been frequently cited. Personnel Psychology, 51, 849-857.
20. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R. & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11, 145-165.
21. Muck, P. M. (2003). Der Interpersonale Circumplex als Grundlage einer Eigenschaftstheorie der Interpersonalität im beruflichen Kontext. Berlin: dissertation.de.
22. Ostendorf, F. (1991). Das Fünf-Faktoren-Modell als umfassendes Modell der Persönlichkeitsbeurteilung: Konsequenzen für die Eignungsdiagnostik. In H. Schuler & U. Funke (Hrsg.), Eignungsdiagnostik in Forschung und Praxis (S. 234-238). Stuttgart: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.
23. Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
24. Vinchur, A. J., Schippmann, J. S., Switzer, F. S. & Roth, P. L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586-597.
25. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P. & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.