The impact of anti-tobacco industry prevention messages in tobacco producing regions: Evidence from the US truth® campaign

Tobacco Control

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 283-288

  Thrasher, J F ^a,b   Niederdeppe, J ^b   Farrelly, M C ^b   Davis, K C ^b   Ribisl, K M ^a   Haviland, M L ^c  

^a IL   (United States)

^b RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^c American Legacy Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADVERTISING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 7544241286     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2003.006403     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Sly DF, Hopkins RS, Trapido E, et al. Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida "truth" campaign. Am J Public Health 2001;91:233-8.
2. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, et al. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 2002;92:901-7.
3. Evans D, Price S, Blahut S, et al. Social imagery tobacco independence, and the truth campaign. Journal of Health Communication 2003;9(4):122-32.
4. Sly DF, Trapido E, Ray S. Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Prev Med 2002;35:511-18.
5. Popham WJ, Potter LD, Heatrick MA, et al. Effectiveness of the California 1990-1991 tobacco education media campaign. Am J Prev Med 1994;10:319-26.
6. Balbach ED, Glantz SA. Tobacco control advocates must demand high-quality media campaigns: the California experience. Tobacco Control 1998;7:397-408.
7. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA 1998;279:772-7.
8. Siegel M, Biener L. The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: Results of a longitudinal study. Am J Public Health 2000;90:380-6.
9. Sly DF, Heald GR, Ray S. The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for future state media evaluations. Tobacco Control 2001;10:9-15.
10. Sly DF, Heald GR, Hopkins RS, et al. The industry manipulation attitudes of smokers and nonsmokers. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2000;6:49-50.
11. Bauer UE, Johnson TM, Hopkins RS, et al. Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida youth tobacco survey, 1998-2000. JAMA 2000;284:723-8.
12. Conlisk E, Herndon-Malek S. Results from the 1999 North Carolina youth tobacco survey: A call to action. North Carolina Med J 2001;62:256-9.
13. CDC. Youth tobacco surveillance - United States, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50(SS04):1-84.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Investment in tobacco control: State highlights, 2001. Atlanta, Georgia: Office on Smoking and Health, CDC, 2001.
15. Chaloupka FJ, Wechsler H. Price, tobacco control policies, and smoking among young adults. J Health Econ 1997;16:359-73.
16. Lindblom E. 2003 State cigarette excise tax rates & rankings. Campaign For Tobacco-Free Kids, 2003.
17. Farrelly MC, Pechacek TF, Chaloupka FJ. The impact of tobacco control program expenditures on aggregate cigarette sales: 1981-2000. J Health Econ 2003;22:843-59.
18. Powers Noland M, Kryscio RJ, Hinkle J, et al. Relationship of personal tobacco-raising, parental smoking, and other factors to tobacco use among adolescents living in a tobacco-producing region. Addict Behav 1996;21:349-61.
19. Powers Noland M, Kryscio RJ, Riggs RS, et al. Use of snuff, chewing tobacco, and cigarettes among adolescents in a tobacco-producing area. Addict Behav 1990;15:517-30.
20. Wilson RW, Higgins CW. Smoking behavior and the tobacco crop. J School Health 1984;54:343-6.
21. Higgins CW, Whitley KN, Dunn JD. A comparison of smoking related attitudes and behaviors among Kentucky public school children whose families are and are not involved in tobacco production. J School Health 1984;54:185-7.
22. Twitchell Murphy N, Price O. The influence of self-esteem, parental smoking, and living in a tobacco producing region on adolescent smoking behavior. J School Health 1988;58:401-5.
23. Whittet MN. Tobacco use prevention and policy advocacy: Focus groups with youth members of tobacco use prevention groups in North Carolina. MPH Thesis, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2003.
24. McGloin T, Burritt S. Getting the message: an assessment of effective themes and styles for anti-tobacco media messages in North Carolina. Chapel Hill: UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 2002:19.
25. Herndon-Malek S, Hopkins DP, Molloy M, et al. The public health challenge of youth smoking in North Carolina. North Carolina Med J 2002;63:153-61.
26. Rosen RJ, Willson CF. The case for increasing North Carolina's cigarette excise tax. North Carolina Med J 2002;63:173-4.
27. Altman D, Levine DW, Howard G, et al. Tobacco farmers and diversification: opportunities and barriers. Tobacco Control 1996;5:192-8.
28. Lindblom EN. False friends: The US cigarette companies' betrayal of American tobacco farmers. Washington, DC: National Center for Tobacco-Free Kids, 1999:106.
29. O'Connell P. Tobacco control in the land of the golden leaf. North Carolina Med J 2002;63:175-6.
30. Hahn EJ, Toumey CP, Rayens MK, et al. Kentucky legislators' views on tobacco policy. Am J Prey Med 1999;16:81-8.
31. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for RDD telephone surveys and in-person household surveys. Ann Arbor, Michgan: American Association for Public Opinion Research, 1998.
32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State tobacco control highlights, 1999. Atlanta: Office on Smoking and Health, CDC, 2000.
33. Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, Haviland ML Confirming truth: more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Am J Public Health 2004;94:255-7.
34. Loomis BR, Thomas KY, Farrelly MC. The impact of state tobacco control programs on aggregate cigarette sales: 1981-2000. Prepared for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. Research Triangle Park: RTI Atlanta, Georgia: Research Triangle Institute & Office on Smoking and Health, CDC, 2002.
35. sm: How counter-industry media campaigns effect smoking behavior among teens. Health Psychol (in press).
36. Leventhal H, Cleary PD. The smoking problem: a review of the research and theory in behavior risk modification. Psychol Bull 1980;88:370-405.
37. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, et al. Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol 1996;15:355-61.
38. Flay BR, Hu FB, Richardson JG. Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students. Prev Med 1998;27:A9-18.
39. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Pathways to established smoking: results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington, DC: American Legacy Foundation, 2000.
40. Pedhauzur EJ, Pedhazur Schmelkin L. Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1991.
41. Chow GC. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 1960;28:591-605.
42. Gould W. Chow tests. Austin, Texas: Stata Corporation, 2002.
43. Wakefield MA, Durrant R, Terry-McElrath Y, et al. Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: a comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain. Tobacco Control 2003;12(suppl II):ii82-6.
44. American Legacy Foundation. What youths think about the tobacco industry and not smoking: results from the baseline Legacy media tracking survey. Washington, DC: American Legacy Foundation, 2002.
45. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985;14:32-8.
46. Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
47. Pechmann C, Reibling ET. Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: case studies from USA and Canada. Tobacco Control 2000;9(suppl II):ii18-31.
48. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG. Teen smoking declines sharply in 2002, more than offsetting large increases in the early 1990s. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, 2002.