Testing an integrative model of respect: Implications for social engagement and well-being

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 200-212

  Huo, Yuen J ^a   Binning, Kevin R ^b   Molina, Ludwin E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Group processes; Inclusion; Procedural justice; Self esteem; Social identity; Status

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LOS ANGELES; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 75349106223     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167209356787     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adler, N.E., Epel, E., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 1, 586-592.
2. Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J.S., Spataro, S.E., & Chatman, J.A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094-1110.
3. Bandalos, D.L., & Finney, S.J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schmacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 497-529.
5. Bentler, P.M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 825-829. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
6. Berger, J., Cohen, B.P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interactions. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
7. Binning, K.R., Unzueta, M.M., Huo, Y.J., & Molina, L.E. (2009). The interpretation of multiracial status and its relation to social engagement and psychological well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 35-49.
8. Boeckmann, R.J., & Tyler, T.R. (2002). Trust, respect and the psychology of political engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2067-2088.
9. Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 744-753.
10. De Cremer, D. (2003). Noneconomic motives predicting cooperation in public good dilemmas: The effect of received respect on contributions. Social Justice Research, 16, 367-377.
11. De Cremer, D., & Blader, S.L. (2006). Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 211-228.
12. Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155-172.
13. Emler, N., & Hopkins, N. (1990). Reputation, social identity and the self. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 113-130). New York/ Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.
15. Frank, R.H. (1985). Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Huo, Y.J. (2003). Procedural justice, identity, and social regulation across group boundaries: Does subgroup loyalty undermine relationship-based governance? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 336-348.
17. Huo, Y.J., & Binning, K.R. (2008). Why the psychological experience of respect matters in group life: An integrative account. Social Psychology and Personality Compass, 2, 1570-1585.
18. Huo, Y.J., & Molina, L.E. (2006). Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 359-376.
19. Huo, Y.J., & Tyler, T.R. (2001). Ethnic diversity and the viability of organizations: The role of procedural justice in bridging differences. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 213-244). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B.M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 130-140.
21. Johnson, A.L., Crawford, M.T., Sherman, S.J., Rutchick, A.M., Hamilton, D.L., Ferreira, M.B.,et al.(2006). A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 707-719.
22. Leary, J.D., Brennan, E.M., & Briggs, H.E. (2005). The African American adolescent respect scale: A measure of a prosocial attitude. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 462-469.
23. Leary, M.R., & Baumeister, R.F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1-62.
24. Leary, M.R., Tambor, E.S., Terdal, S.K., & Downs, D.L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
25. Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
26. Marmot, M. (2004). The status syndrome. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
27. Miller, D.T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.
28. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183-193.
31. Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2005). In search of the active ingredient of respect: A closer look at the role of acceptance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 809-818.
32. Smith, H.J., & Tyler, T.R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 33, 146-170.
33. Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., & Huo, Y.J. (2003). Interpersonal treatment, social identity and organizational behavior. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 155-171). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
34. Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., Huo, Y.J., Ortiz, D., & Lind, E.A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 34, 470-493.
35. Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2005). Let me count the ways in which I respect thee: Does competence compensate or compromise lack of liking from the group? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 263-279.
36. Spears, R., Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Branscombe, N. (2006). The individual within the group: Respect! Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Srivastava, S., & Beer, J.S. (2005). How self-evaluations relate to being liked by others: Integrating sociometer and attachment perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 966-977.
38. Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.
39. Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2002). Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 813-838.
40. Tyler, T.R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
41. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
42. Tyler, T.R., Lind, E.A., Ohbuchi, K., Sugawara, K., & Huo, Y.J. (1998). Conflicts with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 137-146.
43. Tyler, T.R., & Smith, H.J. (1999). Justice, social identity, and group processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. van den Bos, K., & Lind, E.A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45. Ware, J.E., & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-483.
46. Williams, K.D., Forgas, J.P., von Hippel, W., & Zadro, L. (2005). The social outcast: An overview. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 1-16). New York: Psychology Press.