Efficient genome-scale phylogenetic analysis under the duplication-loss and deep coalescence cost models

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPLL.1, 2010, Pages

  Bansal, Mukul S ^a,c   Burleigh, J Gordon ^b   Eulenstein, Oliver ^c  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c Iowa State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY EVENTS; EVOLUTIONARY MODELS; GENE DUPLICATIONS; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; LOCAL SEARCH ALGORITHM; LOCAL SEARCH HEURISTICS; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS; NUMBER OF SPECIES;

COSTS; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; FORESTRY; GENE TRANSFER; GENES; TREES (MATHEMATICS); BIOINFORMATICS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

ALGORITHMS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 75149135738     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S42     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Maddison WP. Gene Trees in Species Trees. Systematic Biology 1997, 46:523-536.
2. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. Discordance of Species Trees with Their Most Likely Gene Trees. PLoS Genetics 2006, 2(5):e68. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020068, 1464820, 16733550.
3. Goodman M, Czelusniak J, Moore GW, Romero-Herrera AE, Matsuda G. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage. A parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Systematic Zoology 1979, 28:132-163.
4. Page RDM. Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas. Systematic Biology 1994, 43:58-77.
5. Guigó R, Muchnik I, Smith TF. Reconstruction of Ancient Molecular Phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1996, 6(2):189-213. 10.1006/mpev.1996.0071, 8899723.
6. Mirkin B, Muchnik I, Smith TF. A Biologically Consistent Model for Comparing Molecular Phylogenies. Journal of Computational Biology 1995, 2(4):493-507. 10.1089/cmb.1995.2.493, 8634901.
7. Eulenstein O, Vingron M. On the equivalence of two tree mapping measures. Discrete Applied Mathematics 1998, 88:101-126.
8. Hallett MT, Lagergren J. New algorithms for the duplication-loss model. RECOMB 2000, 138-146.
9. Bonizzoni P, Vedova GD, Dondi R. Reconciling a gene tree to a species tree under the duplication cost model. Theor Comput Sci 2005, 347(1-2):36-53.
10. Górecki P, Tiuryn J. DLS-trees: A model of evolutionary scenarios. Theor Comput Sci 2006, 359(1-3):378-399.
11. Durand D, Halldórsson BV, Vernot B. A Hybrid Micro-Macroevolutionary Approach to Gene Tree Reconstruction. Journal of Computational Biology 2006, 13(2):320-335. 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.320, 16597243.
12. Chauve C, Doyon JP, El-Mabrouk N. Gene Family Evolution by Duplication, Speciation, and Loss. Journal of Computational Biology 2008, 15(8):1043-1062. 10.1089/cmb.2008.0054, 18781833.
13. Chauve C, El-Mabrouk N. New Perspectives on Gene Family Evolution: Losses in Reconciliation and a Link with Supertrees. RECOMB 2009, 46-58.
14. Maddison WP, Knowles LL. Inferring Phylogeny Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting. Systematic Biology 2006, 55:21-30. 10.1080/10635150500354928, 16507521.
15. Zhang L. Inferring a Species Tree from Gene Trees under the Deep Coalescence Cost. RECOMB 2000, 192-193.
16. Than C, Nakhleh L. Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. PLoS Computational Biology 2009, 5(9):e1000501. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000501, 2729383, 19749978.
17. Ma B, Li M, Zhang L. From Gene Trees to Species Trees. SIAM J Comput 2000, 30(3):729-752.
18. Bordewich M, Semple C. On the computational complexity of the rooted subtree prune and regraft distance. Annals of Combinatorics 2004, 8:409-423.
19. Chen D, Eulenstein O, Fernández-Baca D, Burleigh JG. Improved Heuristics for Minimum-Flip Supertree Construction. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2006, 2:347-356.
20. Page RDM. comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics 1998, 14(9):819-820. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.819, 9918954.
21. Maddison WP, Maddison D. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6. 2009, , http://mesquiteproject.org
22. Bansal MS, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O, Wehe A. Heuristics for the Gene-Duplication Problem: A Θ(n) Speed-Up for the Local Search. RECOMB 2007, 238-252.
23. Bansal MS, Eulenstein O. An Ω(n2/log n) Speed-Up of TBR Heuristics for the Gene-Duplication Problem. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 2008, 5(4):514-524.
24. Liu L, Pearl DK. Species Trees from Gene Trees: Reconstructing Bayesian Posterior Distributions of a Species Phylogeny Using Estimated Gene Tree Distributions. Systematic Biology 2007, 56(3):504-514. 10.1080/10635150701429982, 17562474.
25. Kubatko LS, Carstens BC, Knowles LL. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(7):971-973. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp079, 19211573.
26. Ané C, Larget B, Baum DA, Smith SD, Rokas A. Bayesian Estimation of Concordance Among Gene Trees. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24(7):1575.
27. Arvestad L, Berglund AC, Lagergren J, Sennblad B. Bayesian gene/species tree reconciliation and orthology analysis using MCMC. ISMB (Supplement of Bioinformatics) 2003, 7-15.
28. Äkerborg O, Sennblad B, Arvestad L, Lagergren J. Simultaneous Bayesian gene tree reconstruction and reconciliation analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106(14):5714-5719.
29. Bansal MS. Algorithms for efficient phylogenetic tree construction. PhD thesis 2009, Iowa State Univ.
30. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 2003, 425:798-804. 10.1038/nature02053, 14574403.
31. Kuo CH, Wares JP, Kissinger JC. The Apicomplexan Whole-Genome Phylogeny: An Analysis of Incongruence among Gene Trees. Mol Biol Evol 2008, 25(12):2689-2698. 10.1093/molbev/msn213, 2582981, 18820254.
32. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(21):2688-2690. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446, 16928733.
33. Burleigh JG, Bansal MS, Eulenstein O, Hartmann S, Wehe A, Vision TJ. Genome-scale phylogenetics: inferring the plant tree of life from 18,896 discordant gene trees. Systematic Biology
34. Bansal MS, Eulenstein O, Wehe A. The Gene-Duplication Problem: Near-Linear Time Algorithms for NNI-Based Local Searches. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 2009, 6(2):221-231.
35. Wehe A, Bansal MS, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O. DupTree: a program for large-scale phylogenetic analyses using gene tree parsimony. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(13). 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn230, 18474508.
36. Cotton JA, Page RDM. Tangled tales from multiple markers: reconciling conflict between phylogenies to build molecular supertrees. Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life 2004, 107-125. Springer-Verlag, Bininda-Emonds ORP.