Conjunction errors and semantic transparency

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 47-56

  Wong, Mungchen ^a   Rotello, Caren M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; READING; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 75149117823     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.1.47     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arndt, J., & Jones, T. C. (2008). Elaborative processing and conjunction errors in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 36, 899-912.
2. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
3. Dosher, B. A. (1984). Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 519-555. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(84)90019-7
4. Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Bell, J. A., Truman, D. L., & Lodico, M. G. (1978). The effect of semantic and nonsemantic factors on the integration of verbal units in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 647-655. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.647
5. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.5
6. Hannigan, S. L., & Reinitz, M. T. (2003). Migration of objects and inferences across episodes. Memory & Cognition, 31, 434-444.
7. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 1-18. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1001
8. Jarema, G., Busson, C., Niklova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain & Language, 68, 362-369. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2088 (Pubitemid 29370248)
9. Jones, T. C. (2005). Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures. Memory, 13, 499-515. doi:10.1080/09658210444000197 (Pubitemid 40990590)
10. Jones, T. C., & Atchley, P. (2002). Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: Little evidence for recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 374-379. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.374
11. Jones, T. C., & Atchley, P. (2006). Conjunction errors, recollectionbased rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 70-78. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.70 (Pubitemid 43283747)
12. Jones, T. C., Brown, A. S., & Atchley, P. (2007). Feature and conjunction effects in recognition memory: Toward specifying familiarity for compound words. Memory & Cognition, 35, 984-998.
13. Jones, T. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 82-102. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2761 (Pubitemid 33633918)
14. Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223-244. doi:10.1348/000712603321661903 (Pubitemid 37189317)
15. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present- day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
16. Lampinen, J. M., Odegard, T. N., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2004). Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 332-342. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.332 (Pubitemid 38317878)
17. Leding, J. K., Lampinen, J. M., Edwards, N. W., & Odegard, T. N. (2007). The memory conjunction error paradigm: Normative data for conjunction triplets. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 920-925.
18. Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain & Language, 84, 50-64. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5 (Pubitemid 36268704)
19. Odegard, T. N., Lampinen, J. M., & Toglia, M. P. (2005). Meaning's moderating effect on recollection rejection. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 416-429. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.004 (Pubitemid 41258918)
20. Reder, L. M., Park, H., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2009). Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 23-49. doi:10.1037/a0013974
21. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803-814. doi:10.1037/0278- 7393.21.4.803
22. Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 432-453. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2623
23. Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 907-922.
24. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 67-88. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2701
25. Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 681-690. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.681
26. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864