Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 122-128

  Beesley, T ^a   Wills, A J ^b   le Pelley, M E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; SEMANTICS;

COMPREHENSION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; SEMANTICS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 74849139256     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.122     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Altmann, G. T. M., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 899-912.
2. Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. A., & Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
3. Flannagan, M. J., Fried, L. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 241-256.
4. Haslam, C., Wills, A. J., Haslam, S. A., Kay, J., Baron, R., & McNab, F. (2007). Does maintenance of color categories rely on language? Evidence to the contrary from a case of semantic dementia. Brain & Language, 103, 251-263.
5. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 79-91.
6. Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149-157.
7. Lotz, A., & Kinder, A. (2006). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: The role of repetition information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 707-715.
8. Meulemans, T., & Van der Linden, M. (1997). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1007-1028.
9. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
10. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
11. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
12. Perruchet, P., Vinter, A., Pacteau, C., & Gallego, J. (2002). The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 485-503.
13. Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 227-244.
14. Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2000). The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 847-862.
15. Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 115-119.
16. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Reber, R., & Perruchet, P. (2003). The use of control groups in artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 97-115.
18. Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123-138.
19. Shanks, D. R., Johnstone, T., & Staggs, L. (1997). Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 216-252.
20. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
21. Smith, E. E. (2008). The case for implicit category learning. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 3-16.
22. Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 328-344.