Homogeneity computation: How interitem similarity in visual short-term memory alters recognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 59-65

  Viswanathan, Shivakumar ^a   Perl, Daniel R ^b   Visscher, Kristina M ^c   Kahana, Michael J ^d   Sekuler, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; RECOGNITION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; COGNITION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74849109118     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.59     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bennett, P. J., & Cortese, F. (1996). Masking of spatial frequency in visual memory depends on distal, not retinal, frequency. Vision Research, 36, 233-238. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00085-E
2. Braida, L. D., Lim, J. S., Berliner, J. E., Durlach, N. I., Rabinowitz, W. M., & Purks, S. R. (1984). Intensity perception: XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 722-731. doi:10.1121/1.391258
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
4. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
5. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42-45.
6. GrillSpector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 14-23. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
7. Huang, J., Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2009). A task-irrelevant stimulus attribute affects perception and short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1088-1102.
8. Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2002). Recognizing spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach. Vision Research, 42, 2177-2192. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00118-9
9. Kahana, M. J., Zhou, F., Geller, A., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Lure similarity affects episodic recognition: Detailed tests of a noisy exemplar model. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1222-1232.
10. Lamberts, K., Brockdorff, N., & Heit, E. (2003). Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 351-378. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.351
11. Magnussen, S. (2000). Low-level memory processes in vision. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 247-251. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01569-1
12. Magnussen, S., Greenlee, M. W., Asplund, R., & Dyrnes, S. (1991). Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory. Vision Research, 31, 1213-1219. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90046-8
13. Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1994). Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. Science, 263, 520-522. doi:10.1126/science.8290960
14. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 3-27. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.3
15. Nosofsky, R. M., & Kantner, J. (2006). Exemplar similarity, study list homogeneity, and short-term perceptual recognition. Memory & Cognition, 34, 112-124.
16. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323. doi:10.1126/science.3629243
17. Spitzer, H., Desimone, R., & Moran, J. (1988). Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. Science, 240, 338-340. doi:10.1126/science.3353728
18. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654. doi:10.1126/science.153.3736.652
19. Visscher, K. M., Kaplan, E., Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Auditory short-term memory behaves like visual short-term memory. PLoS Biology, 5, e56. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050056
20. Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113-120.
21. Yotsumoto, Y., Kahana, M. J., Wilson, H. R., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1233-1244.
22. Zaki, S. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1022-1041. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.1022
23. Zhou, F., Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2004). Short-term episodic memory for visual textures: A roving probe gathers some memory. Psychological Science, 15, 112-118. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004 01502007.x