Feature-Sampling and Random-Walk Models of Individual-Stimulus Recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 351-378

  Lamberts, Koen ^a   Brockdorff, Noellie ^a   Heit, Evan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0042879848     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.351     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ashby, F. G., Maddox, W. T., & Lee, W. W. (1994). On the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling or the similarity-choice model. Psychological Science, 5, 144-151.
2. Brockdorff, N., & Lamberts, K. (2000). A feature-sampling account of the time course of old-new recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 77-102.
3. Cohen, A. L., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2003) An extension of the exemplar-based random walk model to separable-dimension stimuli. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 150-165.
4. Diller, D. E., Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 414-435.
5. Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
7. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
8. Gronlund, S. D., & Ratcliff, R. (1991). Analysis of the Hockley and Murdock decision model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 319-344.
9. Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., & Levitin, D. J. (1998). Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall. Memory & Cognition, 26, 449-462.
10. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18.
11. Hockley, W. E., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1987). A decision model for accuracy and response latency in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 94, 341-358.
12. Hockley, W. E., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1992). Speed-accuracy trade-off and item recognition: A reply to Gronlund and Ratcliff. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 461-467.
13. LaBerge, D. A. (1962). A recruitment theory of simple behavior. Psychometrika, 27, 375-396.
14. Lamberts, K. (1995). Categorization under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 161-180.
15. Lamberts, K. (1998). The time course of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 695-711.
16. Lamberts, K. (2000). Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. Psychological Review, 107, 227-260.
17. Lamberts, K. (2002). Feature sampling in categorization and recognition of objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 141-154.
18. Lamberts, K., Brockdorff, N., & Heit, E. (2002). Perceptual processes in matching and recognition of complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1176-1191.
19. Lamberts, K., & Freeman, R. P. J. (1999). Building object representations from parts: Tests of a stochastic sampling model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 904-926.
20. Luce, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp. 103-189). New York: Wiley.
21. Maddox, W. T. (1999). On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 354-375.
22. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
23. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1983). A distributed memory model for serial-order information. Psychological Review, 90, 316-338.
24. Myung, I. J., & Pitt, M. A. (1997). Applying Occam's razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 79-95.
25. Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 384-413.
26. Norman, D. A., & Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Strength theory of decision rules and latency in retrieval from short-term memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 192-208.
27. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
28. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700-708.
29. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3-27.
30. Nosofsky, R. M., & Alfonso-Reese, L. (1999). Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: Further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model. Memory & Cognition, 27, 78-93.
31. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997a). Comparing exemplar-retrieval and decision-bound models of speeded perceptual classification. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1027-1048.
32. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997b). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
33. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
34. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
35. Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 88, 552-572.
36. Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238-255.
37. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356.
38. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300.
39. Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 907-922.
40. Siegler, S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology; General, 116, 250-264.
41. Smith, P. L., & Vickers, D. (1988). The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 135-168.
42. Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.
43. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. O. (1982). Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 834-864.
44. Van Zandt, T. (2000). How to fit a response time distribution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 424-465.
45. Zaki, S. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1022-1041.