Modeling of flow-induced shear stress applied on 3D cellular scaffolds: Implications for vascular tissue engineering

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 645-654

  Lesman, Ayelet ^a   Blinder, Yaron ^a   Levenberg, Shulamit ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Blood vessels; Computational fluid dynamics model; Scaffolds; Shear stress; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

3-D ENVIRONMENTS; 3D SCAFFOLDS; ADVANCED CONTROL; AVERAGE VALUES; CELL LAYERS; CELLULAR GROWTH; CELLULAR SCAFFOLDS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS MODELS; GEOMETRIC DIFFERENCE; HIGH SHEAR; IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS; IN-VITRO; INFLOW VELOCITY; INLET VELOCITY; LAYER THICKNESS; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; PERFUSION BIOREACTOR; PHYSIOLOGICAL RANGE; POROUS SCAFFOLD; PRESSURE DROP CALCULATIONS; STRESS DISTRIBUTION; STRESS VALUES; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) MICROSTRUCTURES; TISSUE DEVELOPMENT; VASCULAR CELLS; VASCULAR TISSUE; VASCULAR TISSUE ENGINEERING; WALL SHEAR;

BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; BLOOD; BLOOD VESSELS; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID DYNAMICS; GROWTH KINETICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PRESSURE DROP; SCAFFOLDS; SHEAR STRESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRESS CONCENTRATION; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CELL GROWTH; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW RATE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; SHEAR STRESS; THICKNESS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VASCULAR TISSUE; VISCOSITY; WALL STRESS;

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 74849104257     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22555     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Antonios G, Mikos JST. 2000. Formation of highly porous biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biotechnol 3:114-119.
2. Boschetti F, Raimondi MT, Migliavacca F, Dubini G. 2006. Prediction of the micro-fluid dynamic environment imposed to three-dimensional engineered cell systems in bioreactors. J Biomech 39(3):418-425.
3. Carrier RL, Rupnick M, Langer R, Schoen FJ, Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G. 2002. Perfusion improves tissue architecture of engineered cardiac muscle. Tissue Eng 8(2):175-188.
4. Caspi O, Lesman A, Basevitch Y, Gepstein A, Arbel G, Habib IH, Gepstein L, Levenberg S. 2007. Tissue engineering of vascularized cardiac muscle from human embryonic stem cells. Circ Res 100(2):263-272.
5. Ng CP, Melody AS. 2003. Fibroblast alignment under iterstitial fluid flow using a novel 3-D tissue culture model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284:1771-1777.
6. Chen HC, Hu YC. 2006. Bioreactors for tissue engineering. Biotechnol Lett 28(18):1415-1423.
7. Chung CA, Chen CW, Chen CP, Tseng CS. 2007. Enhancement of cell growth in tissue-engineering constructs under direct perfusion: Modeling and simulation. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(6):1603-1616.
8. Cioffi M, Boschetti F, Raimondi MT, Dubini G. 2006. Modeling evaluation of the fluid-dynamic microenvironment in tissue-engineered constructs: A micro-CT based model. Biotechnol Bioeng 93(3):500-510.
9. Davies PF, Zilberberg J, Helmke BP. 2003. Spatial microstimuli in endothelial mechanosignaling. Circ Res 92(4):359-370.
10. Draghi L, Resta S, Pirozzolo MG, Tanzi MC. 2005. Microspheres leaching for scaffold porosity control. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16(12):1093-1097.
11. Dvir T, Benishti N, Shachar M, Cohen S. 2006. A novel perfusion bioreactor providing a homogenous milieu for tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng 12(10):2843-2852.
12. German RM. 1989. Particle packing characteristics. Princeton, NJ: Metal Powder Industries Federation. p. 1-21.
13. Hutmacher DW, Singh H. 2008. Computational fluid dynamics for improved bioreactor design and 3D culture. Trends Biotechnol 26(4):166-172.
14. Langer R, Vacanti JP. 1993. Tissue engineering. Science 260(5110):920-926.
15. Levenberg S, Langer R. 2004. Advances in tissue engineering. Curr Top Dev Biol 61:113-134.
16. Levenberg S, Rouwkema J, Macdonald M, Garfein ES, Kohane DS, Darland DC, Marini R, van Blitterswijk CA, Mulligan RC, D'Amore PA, Langer R. 2005. Engineering vascularized skeletal muscle tissue. Nat Biotechnol 23(7):879-884.
17. Martin I, Wendt D, Heberer M. 2004. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 22(2):80-86.
18. McGarry JG, Klein-Nulend J, Mullender MG, Prendergast PJ. 2005. A comparison of strain and fluid shear stress in stimulating bone cell responses-A computational and experimental study. FASEB J 19(3):482-484.
19. Ng CP, Helm CL, Swartz MA. 2004. Interstitial flow differentially stimulates blood and lymphatic endothelial cell morphogenesis in vitro. Microvasc Res 68(3):258-264.
20. Pazzano D, Mercier KA, Moran JM, Fong SS, DiBiasio DD, Rulfs JX, Kohles SS, Bonassar LJ. 2000. Comparison of chondrogensis in static and perfused bioreactor culture. Biotechnol Prog 16(5):893-896.
21. Powers MJ, Domansky K, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Kalezi A, Capitano A, Upadhyaya A, Kurzawski P, Wack KE, Stolz DB, Kamm R, Griffith LG. 2002. A microfabricated array bioreactor for perfused 3D liver culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 78(3):257-269.
22. Raimondi MT, Boschetti F, Falcone L, Fiore GB, Remuzzi A, Marinoni E, Marazzi M, Pietrabissa R. 2002. Mechanobiology of engineered cartilage cultured under a quantified fluid-dynamic environment. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 1(1):69-82.
23. Raimondi MT, Moretti M, Cioffi M, Giordano C, Boschetti F, Lagana K, Pietrabissa R. 2006. The effect of hydrodynamic shear on 3D engineered chondrocyte systems subject to direct perfusion. Biorheology 43(3-4):215-222.
24. Resnick N, Yahav H, Shay-Salit A, Shushy M, Schubert S, Zilberman LC, Wofovitz E. 2003. Fluid shear stress and the vascular endothelium: For better and for worse. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 81(3):177-199.
25. Su Wang JMT. 2000. Effect of fluid flow on smooth muscle cells in a 3-dimensional collagen gel model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:2220-2225.
26. Ueda A, Koga M, Ikeda M, Kudo S, Tanishita K. 2004. Effect of shear stress on microvessel network formation of endothelial cells with in vitro three-dimensional model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287(3):H994-H1002.