Fibroblast alignment under interstitial fluid flow using a novel 3-D tissue culture model

American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Volumn 284, Issue 5 53-5, 2003, Pages

  Ng, Chee Ping ^a   Swartz, Melody A ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell culture; Hydraulic conductivity; Mechanical stress; Shear stress

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLAST; FLUID FLOW; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERSTITIAL FLUID; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SKIN CELL; SOFT TISSUE; TISSUE CULTURE;

EID: 0037405904     PISSN: 03636135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01008.2002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Burger EH and Klein-Nulend J. Microgravity and bone cell mechanosensitivity. Bone 22: 127S-130S, 1998.
2. Carrier RL, Rupnick M, Langer R, Schoen FJ, Freed LE, and Vunjak-Novakovic G. Perfusion improves tissue architecture of engineered cardiac muscle. Tissue Eng 8: 175-188, 2002.
3. Davies PF and Tripathi SC. Mechanical stress mechanisms and the cell. An endothelial paradigm. Circ Res 72: 239-245, 1993.
4. Davis GE and Camarillo CW. Regulation of endothelial cell morphogenesis by integrins, mechanical forces, and matrix guidance pathways. Exp Cell Res 216: 113-123, 1995.
5. DeSilva BS, Hendrickson TL, and Topp EM. Development of a cell culture system to study antibody convection in tumors. J Pharm Sci 86: 858-864, 1997.
6. Eastwood M, Mudera VC, McGrouther DA, and Brown RA. Effect of precise mechanical loading on fibroblast populated collagen lattices: morphological changes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 40: 13-21, 1998.
7. Glowacki J, Mizuno S, and Greenberger JS. Perfusion enhances functions of bone marrow stromal cells in three-dimensional culture. Cell Transplant 7: 319-326, 1998.
8. Grodzinsky AJ, Levenston ME, Jin M, and Frank EH. Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2: 691-713, 2000.
9. Guyton AC, Scheel K, and Murphree D. Interstitial fluid pressure. III. Its effect on resistance to tissue fluid mobility. Circ Res 19: 412-419, 1966.
10. Haugland RP. Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Products. Eugene, OR: Molecular Probes, 2002.
11. Hillsley MV and Frangos JA. Bone tissue engineering: the role of interstitial fluid flow. Biotechnol Bioeng 43: 573-581, 1994.
12. Kanda K, Matsuda T, and Oka T. In vitro reconstruction of hybrid vascular tissue. Hierarchic and oriented cell layers. ASAIO J 39: M561-M565, 1993.
13. Knothe Tate ML. Interstitial fluid flow. In: Bone Mechanics Handbook (2nd ed.), edited by Cowin SC. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2001, p. 22-1-22-29.
14. Kolodney MS and Wysolmerski RB. Isometric contraction by fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tissue culture: a quantitative study. J Cell Biol 117: 73-82, 1992.
15. Levick JR. Flow through interstitium and other fibrous matrices. Q J Exp Physiol 72: 409-437, 1987.
16. Liu M, Tanswell AK, and Post M. Mechanical force-induced signal transduction in lung cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 277: L667-L683, 1999.
17. Liu SQ. Biomechanical basis of vascular tissue engineering. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 27: 75-148, 1999.
18. Liu SQ. Influence of tensile strain on smooth muscle cell orientation in rat blood vessels. J Biomech Eng 120: 313-320, 1998.
19. Mizuno S, Allemann F, and Glowacki J. Effects of medium perfusion on matrix production by bovine chondrocytes in three-dimensional collagen sponges. J Biomed Mater Res 56: 368-375, 2001.
20. Mow VC, Wang CC, and Hung CT. The extracellular matrix, interstitial fluid and ions as a mechanical signal transducer in articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7: 41-58, 1999.
21. Mueller SM, Mizuno S, Gerstenfeld LC, and Glowacki J. Medium perfusion enhances osteogenesis by murine osteosarcoma cells in three-dimensional collagen sponges. J Bone Miner Res 14: 2118-2126, 1999.
22. Pasternak AS and Miller WM. First-order toxicity assays for eye irritation using cell-lines-parameters that affect in-vitro evaluation. Fundam Appl Toxicol 25: 253-263, 1995.
23. Pohlman TH and Harlan JM. Adaptive responses of the endothelium to stress. J Surg Res 89: 85-119, 2000.
24. Seliktar D, Black RA, Vito RP, and Nerem RM. Dynamic mechanical conditioning of collagen-gel blood vessel constructs induces remodeling in vitro. Ann Biomed Eng 28: 351-362, 2000.
25. Skalak TC and Price RJ. The role of mechanical stresses in microvascular remodeling. Microcirculation 3: 143-165, 1996.
26. Stile RA, Barber TA, Castner DG, and Healy KE. Sequential robust design methodology and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to analyze the grafting of hyaluronic acid to glass substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 61: 391-398, 2002.
27. Swartz MA, Kaipainen A, Netti PA, Brekken C, Boucher Y, Grodzinsky AJ, and Jain RK. Mechanics of interstitial-lymphatic fluid transport: theoretical foundation and experimental validation. J Biomech 32: 1297-1307, 1999.
28. Tranquillo RT. Self-organization of tissue-equivalents: the nature and role of contact guidance. Biochem Soc Symp 65: 27-42, 1999.
29. Wang DM and Tarbell JM. Modeling interstitial flow in an artery wall allows estimation of wall shear stress on smooth muscle cells. J Biomech Eng 117: 358-363, 1995.
30. Wang S and Tarbell JM. Effect of fluid flow on smooth muscle cells in a 3-dimensional collagen gel model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20: 2220-2225, 2000.
31. Wiig H. Evaluation of methodologies for measurement of interstitial fluid pressure (Pi): physiological implications of recent Pi data. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18: 27-54, 1990.
32. Wiig H and Reed RK. Interstitial compliance and transcapillary Starling pressures in cat skin and skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 248: H666-H673, 1985.
33. Wirtz HR and Dobbs LG. The effects of mechanical forces on lung functions. Respir Physiol 119: 1-17, 2000.