Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: Analysis of the CORE-64 multicenter international trial

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 194, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 85-92

  Wykrzykowska, Joanna J ^a,b   Arbab Zadeh, Armin ^c   Godoy, Gustavo ^c   Miller, Julie M ^c   Lin, Shezhang ^a   Vavere, Andrea ^c   Paul, Narinder ^d   Niinuma, Hiroyuki ^e   Hoe, John ^f   Brinker, Jeffrey ^c   Khosa, Faisal ^a   Sarwar, Sheryar ^a   Lima, Joao ^c   Clouse, Melvin E ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f MOUNT ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Angiography; Cardiac imaging; CORE 64; MDCT; Restenosis; Stents

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; IOPAMIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGISTRIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 74749103732     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2652     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. King SB 3rd, Smith SC Jr, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51:172-209
2. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:489-495
3. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:496-501
4. Serruys PW, Foley DP, Suttorp MJ, et al. A randomized comparison of the value of additional stenting after optimal balloon angioplasty for long coronary lesions: final results of the additional value of NIR stents for treatment of long coronary lesions (ADVANCE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:393-399
5. Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 2007; 370:937-948
6. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Colombo A, et al. Offsetting impact of thrombosis and restenosis on the occurrence of death and myocardial infarction after paclitaxel-eluting and bare metal stent implantation. Circulation 2007; 115:2842-2847
7. Nayak AK, Kawamura A, Nesto RW, et al. Myocardial infarction as a presentation of clinical instent restenosis. Circ J 2006; 70:1026-1029
8. Walters DL, Harding SA, Walsh CR. Acute coronary syndrome is a common clinical presentation of in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89:491-494
9. Bossi I, Klersy C, Black AJ, et al. In-stent restenosis: long-term outcome and predictors of subsequent target lesion revascularization after repeat balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35:1569-1576
10. Chen MS, John JM, Chew DP. Bare metal stent restenosis is not a benign clinical entity. Am Heart J 2006; 151:1260-1264
11. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2007; 28:3042-3050
12. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006; 296:403-411
13. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52:1724-1732
14. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2006; 92:58-61
15. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE, et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol 2004; 39:27-33
16. Windecker S, Serruys PW, Wandel S, et al. Biolimuseluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2008; 372:1163-1173
17. Miller JM, Dewey M, Vavere AL, et al. Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:816-828
18. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:2324-2336
19. Ringqvist I, Fisher LD, Mock M, et al. Prognostic value of angiographic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Clin Invest 1983; 71:1854-1866
20. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003; 107:664-666
21. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:123-127
22. Ohnuki K, Yoshida S, Ohata M, et al. New diagnostic technique in multi-slice computed tomography for in-stent restenosis: pixel count method. Int J Cardiol 2006; 108:251-258
23. Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken AH, Das M, et al. Evaluation of aortocoronary bypass stents with cardiac MDCT compared with conventional catheter angiography. AJR 2007; 188:361-369
24. Beohar N, Robbins JD, Cavanaugh BJ, et al. Quantitative assessment of in-stent dimensions: a comparison of 64 and 16 detector multislice computed tomography to intravascular ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68:8-10
25. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 427-430
26. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent reste nosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2204-2210
27. Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006; 114:645-653
28. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:2567-2572
29. Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C, et al. Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart 2008; 94:848-854
30. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:951-959
31. Gaspar T, Dvir D, Peled N. The role of 16-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: large sample analysis. Isr Med Assoc J 2005; 7:424-427
32. Hecht HS, Zaric M, Jelnin V, et al. Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101:820-824
33. Schepis T, Koepfli P, Leschka S, et al. Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:1464-1473