Examination of the potential for using chemical analysis as a surrogate for sensory analysis

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volumn 660, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 2-7

  Blackman, John ^a   Rutledge, Douglas N ^b   Tesic, Dejan ^a   Saliba, Anthony ^a   Scollary, Geoffrey R ^c  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Chemical analysis; Chemometrics; Hunter Valley Semillon; Sensory analysis; Wine

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL DATA; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; CHEMOMETRICS; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA SETS; DESCRIPTORS; HUNTER VALLEY SEMILLON; MALIC ACIDS; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SPECIFIC WEIGHTS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TITRATABLE ACIDITY;

ACIDITY; CHEMICALS; GLUCOSE; GLYCEROL; LANDFORMS; WINE;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS;

FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; KEROSENE; MALIC ACID;

ACIDITY; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; AROMA; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMOMETRICS; COMMON COMPONENT AND SPECIFIC WEIGHT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOOD ANALYSIS; HONEY; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SENSORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SWEETNESS; TASTE DISCRIMINATION; VINICULTURE; WINE;

EID: 74549127462     PISSN: 00032670     EISSN: 18734324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.062     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Meiselman H.L. Critical evaluation of sensory techniques. Food Qual. Prefer. 4 (1993) 33-40
2. Jack F.R., and Steele G.M. Modelling the sensory characteristics of Scotch whiskey using neural networks-a novel tool for generic protection. Food Qual. Prefer. 13 (2002) 163-172
3. 1H NMR data to develop a methodology for the confirmation of the wild and farmed salmon and their origins. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387 (2006) 1499-1510
4. Masoum S., Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D., Vercauteren J., Jalali-Heravi M., and Rutledge D.N. Discrimination of wines based on 2d NMR spectra using learning vector quantization neural networks and partial least squares discriminant analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 558 (2006) 144-149
5. 1H NMR: discrimination between grapefruit juice, orange juice and blends thanks to chemometric tools. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 390 (2008) 419-427
6. Cuny M., Le Gall G., Colquhoun I., Lees M., and Rutledge D.N. Evolving Window Zone Selection method followed by Independent Component Analysis as useful chemometric tools to discriminate between grapefruit juice, orange juice and blends. Anal. Chim. Acta 597 (2007) 203-213
7. Piggott J.R. Relating sensory and chemical data to understand flavour. J. Sens. Stud. 4 (1990) 261-272
8. Careri M., Mangia A., Barbieri G., Bouoni L., Virgili R., and Parolari G. Sensory property relationships to chemical data of Italian-type dry-cured ham. J. Food Sci. 58 (1993) 968-972
9. Meng A.-K., and Suffet I.H. A procedure for correlation of chemical and sensory data in drinking water samples by Principal Component Factor analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31 (1997) 337-345
10. Durante C., Cocchi M., Grandi M., Marchetti A., and Bro R. Application of N-PLS to gas chromatographic and sensory data of traditional balsamic vinegars of Modena. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 83 (2006) 54-65
11. Vainionpää J., Smolander M., Alakomi H.-L., Ritvanen T., Rajamäki T., Rokka M., and Ahvenainen R. Comparison of different analytical methods in the monitoring of the quality of modified atmosphere packaged broiler chicken cuts using principal component analysis. J. Food Eng. 65 (2004) 273-280
12. Senesi E., Lo Scalzo R., Prinzivalli C., and Testoni A. Relationships between volatile composition and sensory evaluation in eight varieties of netted muskmelon (Cucumis melo L var reticulatus Naud). J. Sci. Food Agric. 82 (2002) 655-662
13. Bakker J., and Arnold G.M. Analysis of sensory and chemical data for colour evaluation of a range of red port wines. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 44 (1993) 27-34
14. Kennedy J.A., Ferrier J., Harbertson J.F., and Peyrot des Gachons C. Analysis of tannins in red wine using multiple methods: correlation with perceived astringency. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 57 (2006) 481-485
15. Wilson C.I., and Threapleton L. Application of artificial intelligence for predicting beer flavours from chemical analysis. Proceedings of the 29th European Brewery Convention Congress. Dublin, Ireland, May 2003 (2003) 17-22
16. Le Moigne M., Maury C., Bertrand D., and Jourjon F. Sensory and instrumental characterisation of Cabernet Franc grapes according to ripening stages and growing location. Food Qual. Prefer. 19 (2008) 220-231
17. Lindinger C., Pollien P., Labbe D., Rytz A., Juillerat M.A., and Blank I. Prediction of the overall sensory profile of espresso coffee by on-line headspace measurement using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry. In: Bredie W.L.P., and Pearson M.A. (Eds). Flavour Science: Recent Advances and Trends (2006), Elsevier B.V 497-500
18. Hanafi M., Mazerolles G., Dufour E., and Qannari E.M. Common components and specific weight analysis and multiple Co-inertia analysis applied to the coupling of several measurement techniques. J. Chemom. 20 (2006) 1
19. Qannari E.M., Wakeling I., Courcoux P., and MacFie H.J.H. Defining the underlying sensory dimensions. Food Qual. Prefer. 11 (2000) 151-154
20. Iland P., and Gago P. Australian Wine: Styles and Tastes (2002), Patrick Iland Wine Promotions, Campbelltown pp. 78-79
21. Bulleid N. The many faces of Semillon: varietal report. Aust. NZ. Wine Ind. J. 20 (2005) 75-95
22. Shallenberger R.S. Taste Chemistry (1993), Blackie Academic and Professional/Chapman and Hall, Glasgow pp. 189-192
23. ISO 11035:1994, Sensory analysis-identification and selection of descriptors for establishing a sensory profile by a multidimensional approach, 1994.
24. Blackman J., and Saliba A. Sensory characterization of Hunter Valley Semillon using descriptive analysis. Flavour Fragrance J. 24 (2009) 238-244
25. Zamora M.C., Goldner M.C., and Galmarini M.V. Sourness-sweetness interactions in different media: white wine, ethanol and water. J. Sens. Stud. 21 (2006) 601-611
26. Gawel R., Van Sluyter S., and Waters E.J. The effects of ethanol and glycerol on the body and other sensory characteristics of Riesling wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 13 (2007) 38-45
27. Noble A.C., and Bursick G.F. The contribution of glycerol to perceived viscosity and sweetness in white wine. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 35 (1984) 110-112
28. Nurgel C., and Pickering G.J. Contribution of glycerol, ethanol and sugar to the perception of viscosity and density in white wine. J. Texture Stud. 36 (2005) 303-325
29. Peynaud E. The Taste of Wine (1987), McMillan Orbis, London p. 73
30. Amerine M.A., Roessler E.B., and Ough C.S. Acids and the acid taste. I. The effect of pH and titratable acidity. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 16 (1965) 29-37
31. Noble A.C., Philbrick K.C., and Boulton R.B. Comparison of sourness of organic acid anions at equal pH and equal titratable acidity. J. Sens. Stud. 1 (1986) 1-8
32. Lugaz O., Pillias A.-M., Boireau-Ducept N., and Faurion A. Time-intensity evaluation of acid taste in subjects with saliva high flow and low flow rates for acids of various chemical properties. Chem. Senses 30 (2005) 89-103