Response surface methodology for process parameter optimization of hydrogen yield by the metabolically engineered strain Escherichia coli DJT135

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 101, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1820-1825

  Ghosh, Dipankar ^a   Hallenbeck, Patrick C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Hydrogen yield; Metabolic engineering; Response surface methodology (RSM)

Indexed keywords

BIOFUELS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GLUCOSE; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; STRAIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ENGINEERED STRAINS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS; FERMENTATIVE PROCESS; GLUCOSE CONCENTRATION; HYDROGEN YIELDS; PROCESS PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS PARAMETERS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN; BIOFUEL;

BIOFUEL; COLIFORM BACTERIUM; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN; METABOLISM; OPTIMIZATION; PH;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOPROCESS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI DJT135; FERMENTATION; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; TEMPERATURE; BIOREACTOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

BIOFUELS; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 74549124869     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.020     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akhtar, M.K., Jones, P.R., 2009. Construction of a synthetic YdbK-dependent pyruvate: H2 pathway in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). Metabol. Eng. 11, 139-147.
2. Annadurai, G., Balan, S.M., Murugesan, T., 1999. Box-Behnken design in the development of optimized complex medium of phenol degradation using Pseudomonas putida (NICM 2174). Bioprocess Eng. 21, 415-421.
3. Bartacek, J., Jana Zabranska, J., Lens, P.N.L., 2007. Developments and constraints in fermentative hydrogen production. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 1, 201-214.
4. Bisaillon, A., Turcot, J., Hallenbeck, P.C., 2006. The effect of nutrient limitation on hydrogen production by batch cultures of Escherichia coli. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 31, 1504-1508.
5. Box, G.E.P., Behnken, D.W., 1960. Three level design for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2, 455-475.
6. Davila-Vazquez, G., Arriaga, S., Alatriste-Mondragón, F., de León-Rodríguez, A., Rosales-Colunga, L.M., Razo-Flores, E. 2008. Fermentative biohydrogen production: trends and perspectives. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 7, 27-45.
7. Fabriano, B., Perego, P., 2002. Thermodynamic study and optimization of hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 27, 149-156.
8. Ghosh, D., Hallenbeck, P.C., 2009. Fermentative hydrogen yields from different sugars by batch cultures of metabolically engineered Escherichia coli DJT135. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 7979-7982.
9. Hallenbeck, P.C., 2005. Fundamentals of the fermentative production of hydrogen. Water Sci. Technol. 52, 21-29.
10. Hallenbeck, P.C., 2009. Fermentative hydrogen production: principles, progress, and prognosis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 7379-7389.
11. Hallenbeck, P.C., Benemann, J.R., 2002. Biological hydrogen production; fundamentals and limiting processes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 27, 1185-1193.
12. Hallenbeck, P.C., Ghosh, D., 2009. Fermentative hydrogen production: the way forward? Trends Biotechnol. 27, 287-297.
13. Hallenbeck, P.C., Ghosh, D., Skonieczny, M.T., Yargeau, V., 2009. Microbiological and engineering aspects of biohydrogen production. Ind. J. Microbiol. 49, 48-59.
14. Hanrahan, G., Lu, K., 2006. Application of factorial and response surface methodology in modern experimental design and optimization. Crit. Rev. Analyt. Chem. 36, 41-151.
15. Hawkes, F.R., Hussy, I., Kyazze, G., Dinsdale, R., Hawkes, D.L., 2007. Continuous dark fermentative hydrogen production by mesophilic microflora: principles and progress. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 172-184.
16. Jo, J.H., Lee, D.S., Park, D., Choe, W., Park, J.M., 2008. Optimization of key process variables for enhanced hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes using statistical methods. Bioresource Technol. 99, 2061-2066.
17. Kapdan, I.K., Kargi, F., 2006. Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 38, 569-582.
18. Lay, J.J., 2000. Modeling and optimization of anaerobic digested sludge converting starch to hydrogen. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68, 269-278.
19. Lee, K.-M., Gilmore, D.F., 2006. Statistical experimental design for bioprocess modeling and optimization analysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 135, 101-115.
20. Lee, Y.J., Miyahara, T., Noike, T., 2002. Effect of pH on microbial hydrogen fermentation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 77, 694-698.
21. Maeda, T., Sanchez-Torres, V., Wood, T.K., 2007. Enhanced hydrogen production from glucose by a metabolically-engineered Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77, 879-890.
22. Miller, G.L., 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 31, 426-429.
23. Miller, J.H., 1992. A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics: A Laboratory Manual and Hand Book for Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
24. Mu, Y., Wang, G., Yu, H.Q., 2006. Response surface methodological analysis on biohydrogen production by enriched anaerobic cultures. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 38, 905-913.
25. Rachman, M.A., Nakashimada, Y., Kakizono, T., Nishio, N., 1998. Hydrogen production with high yield and high evolution rate by self-flocculated cells of Enterobacter aerogenes in a packed-bed reactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 49, 450-454.
26. Turcot, J., Bisaillon, A., Hallenbeck, P.C., 2008. Hydrogen production by continuous cultures of Escherchia coli under different nutrient regimes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33, 1465-1470.
27. Van Ginkel, S., Sung, S., Lay, J.J., 2001. Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Int. J Hydrogen Energy 23, 559-563.
28. Vignais, P.M., Magnin, J.-P., Willison, J.C., 2006. Increasing biohydrogen production by metabolic engineering. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 31, 1478-1483.
29. Wang, J., Wan, W., 2008. Optimization of fermentative hydrogen production process by response surface methodology. Int. J Hydrogen Energy 33, 6976-6984.
30. Wang, J., Wan, W., 2009. Experimental design methods for fermentative hydrogen production: a review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 235-244.
31. Wang, G., Mu, Y., Yu, H.Q., 2005. Response surface analysis to evaluate the influence of pH, temperature and substrate concentration on the acidogenesis of sucroserich wastewater. Biochem. Eng. J. 23, 175-184.
32. Whittinghill, D.C., 1998. A note on the robustness of Box-Behnken designs to the unavailability of data. Matrika 48, 49-52.
33. Yoshida, A., Nishimura, T., Kawaguchi, H., Inui, M., Yukawa, H., 2006. Enhanced hydrogen production from glucose using ldh- and frd-inactivated Escherichia coli strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73, 67-72.