The no child left behind act: Challenges and implications for educators

Intervention in School and Clinic

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 67-75

  Simpson, Richard L ^a   LaCava, Paul G ^a   Graner, Patricia Sampson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7444265938     PISSN: 10534512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10534512040400020101     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Albrecht, S. F., & Joles, C. (2003). Accountability and access to opportunity: Mutually exclusive tenets under a high-stakes testing mandate. Preventing School Failure, 47(2), 86-91.
2. Algozzine, R. (2003). Scientifically based research: Who let the dogs out? Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28(3), 156-160.
3. Allbritten, D., Mainzer, R., & Ziegler, D. (2004). Will students with disabilities be scapegoats for school failures? Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(3), 73-75.
4. Bracey, G. W. (2003). The 13th Bracey report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 148-164.
5. Center on Educational Policy. (2003). From the capitol to the classroom: State and federal efforts to implement the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved March 29, 2004, from http:// www.ctredpol.org/pubs/nclbfullreportjan2003.pdf
6. Cook, B. G., & Schirmer, B. R. (2003). What is special about special education? Overview and Analysis, 37, 200-205.
7. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teacher Policy.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The challenge of staffing our schools. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 12-17.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6-13.
10. Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining "highly qualified teacher"; What does "scientifically-based research" actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13-25.
11. Egnor, D. (2003, March). Implications for special education policy and practice. Principal Leadership, 3(7), 10-13.
12. Ehrenberg, R. G., & Brewer, D. J. (1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from high school and beyond. Economics of Education Review, 13, 1-17.
13. Eisenhart, M., & Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on "scientifically based" education research. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31-38.
14. Hardman, M., & Mulder, M. (2003, November). Federal education reform: Critical issues in public education and the impact on students with disabilities. Paper presented at the Eagle Summit on Critical Issues on the Future of Personnel Preparation in Emotional/Behavioral Disorders. University of North Texas Institute on Behavioral and Learning Differences, Denton, TX.
15. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 (26)
16. Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 77, 30-33.
17. Leaving some children behind. (2004, January 27). The New York Times, p. 22.
18. Mathis, W. (2003). No child left behind: Costs and benefits. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 679.
19. McKenzie, J. (2003). NCLB: AKA "helter-skelter?" Retrieved from KQWeb, American Library Association Web site: www.ala.org
20. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq.
21. Robelen, E. W. (2002, January 9). An ESEA Primer. Education Week, pp. 28-29.
22. Rose, L. C., & Gallup, A. M. (2001). The 33rd Annual Phi Delta Kappa/ Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 41-58.
23. Rose, L. C., & Gallup, A. M. (2002). The 34th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/ Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 41-56.
24. Rose, L. C., & Gallup, A. M. (2003). The 35th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/ Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 42-52.
25. Sailor, W., & Stowe, M. (2003). The relationship of inquiry to public policy. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28(3), 148-152.
26. Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Smith, A. (2003). Scientifically based research and evidence-based education: A federal policy context. Research if Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28(3), 126-132.
28. Southwest Educational Developmental Laboratory. (2000). Building reading proficiency at the secondary level. A guide to resources. Retrieved February 4, 2004, from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/catalog/items/ read16.html
29. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. Washington, DC: Author.
30. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind: A desktop reference. Washington, DC: Author.
31. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation. (2004). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary's second annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
32. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Public Affairs, News Branch. (February 25, 2003). Principles for reauthorizing the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
33. U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary. (2003). No Child Left Behind: A toolkit for teachers. Washington, DC, Author.
34. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student academic achievement: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.