Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma

Ophthalmology

Volumn 111, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 2117-2125

  Mayama, Chihiro ^a   Araie, Makoto ^a   Suzuki, Yasuyuki ^b   Ishida, Kyoko ^c   Yamamoto, Tetsuya ^c   Kitazawa, Yoshiaki ^c   Shirakashi, Motohiro ^d   Abe, Haruki ^d   Tsukamoto, Hidetoshi ^e   Mishima, Hiromu K ^e   Yoshimura, Kenichi ^a   Ohashi, Yasuo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b TEIKYO UNIVERSITY CHIBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^c GIFU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e HIROSHIMA UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COVARIANCE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE COURSE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 7444239583     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. H. Bebie, F. Fankhauser, J. Spahr Static perimetry: accuracy and fluctuations Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 54 1976 339 348
2. E.B. Werner, N. Saheb, D. Thomas Variability of static visual threshold responses in patients with elevated IOPs Arch Ophthalmol 100 1982 1627 1631
3. J.T. Wilensky, B.C. Joondeph Variation in visual field measurements with an automated petimeter Am J Ophthalmol 97 1984 328 331
4. J. Flammer, S.M. Drance, M. Zulauf Differential light threshold: short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 102 1984 704 706
5. J. Katz, A. Sommer A longitudinal study of the age-adjusted variability of automated visual fields Arch Ophthalmol 105 1987 1083 1086
6. A. Heijl, G. Lindgren, J. Olsson Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field Arch Ophthalmol 105 1987 1544 1549
7. A. Heijl, A. Lindgren, G. Lindgren Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields Am J Ophthalmol 108 1989 130 135
8. E.B. Werner, B. Petrig, T. Krupin, K.I. Bishop Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30 1989 1083 1089
9. A. Heijl, G. Lindgren, J. Olsson The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects Arch Ophthalmol 107 1989 81 86
10. E.B. Werner, T. Krupin, A. Adelson, M.E. Feitl Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients Ophthalmology 97 1990 44 48
11. R.J. Boeglin, J. Caprioli, M. Zulauf Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma Am J Ophthalmol 113 1992 396 400
12. B.C. Chauhan, S.M. Drance, G.R. Douglas The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31 1990 512 520
13. B.N. Noureddin, D. Poinoosawmy, F.W. Fietzke [sic], R.A. Hitchings Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma Br J Ophthalmol 75 1991 493 495
14. F.W. Fitzke, R.A. Hitchings, D Poinoosawmy Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma Br J Ophthalmol 80 1996 40 48
15. A. Bhandari, D.P. Crabb, D Poinoosawmy Effect of surgery on visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma Ophthalmology 104 1997 1131 1137
16. K. Nouri-Mahdavi, L. Brigatti, M. Weitzman, J. Caprioli Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma Ophthalmology 104 1997 1228 1236
17. E.B. Werner, K.I. Bishop, J Koelle A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry Arch Ophthalmol 106 1988 619 623
18. S.D. Smith, J. Katz, H.A. Quigley Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37 1996 1419 1428
19. J.M. Wild, N. Hutchings, M.K Hussey Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma Ophthalmology 104 1997 808 815
20. C. O'Brien, B. Schwartz, T. Takamoto, D.C. Wu Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma Am J Ophthalmol 111 1991 491 500
21. M.K. Birch, P.K. Wishart, N.P. O'Donnell Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields Ophthalmology 102 1995 1227 1234 discussion 12345
22. N. Koseki, M. Araie, S. Shirato, S. Yamamoto Effect of trabeculectomy on visual field performance in central 30 degrees field in progressive normal-tension glaucoma Ophthalmology 104 1997 197 201
23. A. Sawada, Y. Kitazawa, T Yamamoto Prevention of visual field defect progression with brovincamine in eyes with normal-tension glaucoma Ophthalmology 103 1996 283 288
24. J.F. Hills, C.A. Johnson Evaluation of the t test as a method of detecting visual field changes Ophthalmology 95 1988 261 266
25. H.D. Hoskins, S.D. Magee, M.V. Drake, M.N. Kidd Confidence intervals for change in automated visual fields Br J Ophthalmol 72 1988 591 597
26. J.S. Schultz, E.B. Werner, T Krupin Intraocular pressure and visual field defects after argon laser trabeculoplasty in chronic open-angle glaucoma Ophthalmology 94 1987 553 557
27. A. Heijl, G. Lindgren, A.F Lindgren Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields in glaucoma: STATPAC-2 R.P. Mills A. Heijl Perimetry Update 1990/1991 1991 Kugler Ghedini New York 303 315
28. R.K. Morgan, W.J. Feuer, D.R. Anderson STATPAC2 glaucoma change probability Arch Ophthalmol 109 1991 1690 1692
29. A.C. Viswanathan, F.W. Fitzke, R.A. Hitchings Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2 Br J Ophthalmol 81 1997 1037 1042
30. M.C. Leske, A. Heijl, L. Hyman, B. Bengtsson Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data Ophthalmology 106 1999 2144 2153
31. M. Araie, M. Sekine, Y. Suzuki, N. Koseki Factors contributing to the progression of visual field damage in eyes with normal-tension glaucoma Ophthalmology 101 1994 1440 1444
32. B.C. Chauhan, P.H. House, T.A. McCormick, R.P. LeBlanc Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls Arch Ophthalmol 117 1999 24 33
33. I. Ansari, B.C. Chauhan, T.A. McCormick, R.P. LeBlanc Comparison of conventional and pattern discrimination perimetry in a prospective study of glaucoma patients Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 2000 4150 4157
34. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1445-55.
35. D.C. Musch, P.R. Lichter, K.E Guire CIGTS Study Group The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients Ophthalmology 106 1999 653 662
36. A.I. McNaught, D.P. Crabb, F.W. Fitzke, R.A. Hitchings Visual field progression: comparison of Humphrey STATPAC2 and pointwise linear regression analysis Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234 1996 411 418
37. A. Heijl, B. Bengtsson, G. Lindgren Visual field progression in glaucoma [letter] Br J Ophthalmol 82 1998 1097 1098
38. J. Katz Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment Ophthalmology 106 1999 391 395
39. J. Katz, N. Congdon, D.S. Friedman Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment Arch Ophthalmol 117 1999 1137 1142
40. J. Katz, D. Gilbert, H.A. Quigley, A. Sommer Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma Ophthalmology 104 1997 1017 1025
41. S.K. Gardiner, D.P. Crabb Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 2002 1400 1407
42. P.G. Spry, A.B. Bates, C.A. Johnson, B.C. Chauhan Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 2000 2192 2200
43. E. Vesti, C.A. Johnson, B.C. Chauhan Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 2003 3873 3879
44. Y. Suzuki, Y. Kitazawa, M Araie Mathematical and optimal clustering of test points of the central 30-degree visual field of glaucoma J Glaucoma 10 2001 121 128
45. M.B. Shields Textbook of Glaucoma 4th ed 1998 Williams Wilkins Baltimore 8294
46. Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT): 6 Treatment group differences in visual field changes Am J Ophthalmol 120 1995 10 22
47. C.E. Krakau A statistical trap in the evaluation of visual field decay Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 173 1985 19 21
48. A. Heijl, N. Lindgren, G. Lindgren Interpoint correlations of deviations of threshold values in normal and glaucomatous visual fields A. Heijl Perimetry Update 1988/1989 1989 Kugler Ghedini Amsterdam 177 183
49. Y. Suzuki, M. Araie, Y. Ohashi Sectorization of the central 30 degrees visual field in glaucoma Ophthalmology 100 1993 69 75
50. N. Koseki, M. Araie, J. Yamagami, Y. Suzuki Sectorization of central 10-deg visual field in open-angle glaucoma An approach for its brief evaluation Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233 1995 621 626
51. S. Mandava, M. Zulauf, T. Zeyen, J. Caprioli An evaluation of clusters in the glaucomatous visual field Am J Ophthalmol 116 1993 684 691
52. F.S. Mikelberg, S.M. Drance The mode of progression of visual field defects in glaucoma Am J Ophthalmol 98 1984 443 445
53. F.W. Fitzke, D.P. Crabb, A.I McNaught Image processing of computerised visual field data Br J Ophthalmol 79 1995 207 212
54. D.P. Crabb, D.F. Edgar, F.W Fitzke New approach to estimating the variability in visual field data using an image processing technique Br J Ophthalmol 79 1995 213 217
55. B.C. Chauhan, P.H. House Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry Ophthalmology 98 1991 79 83
56. B.C. Chauhan, C.A. Johnson Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40 1999 648 656
57. P. Asman, A. Heijl Glaucoma Hemifield Test Automated visual field evaluation Arch Ophthalmol 110 1992 812 819