Success by design: HOPE VI, new urbanism, and the neoliberal transformation of public housing in the United States

Environment and Planning A

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 80-98

  Hanlon, James ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING PROJECT; NEOLIBERALISM; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

KENTUCKY; LOUISVILLE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 74349114308     PISSN: 0308518X     EISSN: 14723409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/a41278     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. AIArchitect Digest 2000, 2000 AIA honor awards: regional and urban design, February, http://www.e-architect.com/news/aiarchitect/feb00/honor4.asp
2. Bair E, Fitzgerald J M, 2005, Hedonistic estimation and policy significance of the impact of HOPE VI on neighborhood property values Review of Policy Research 22 771-786
3. Bennett L, 1998, Do we really wish to live in a communitarian city: communitarian thinking and theredevelopmentofChicago-GreenpublichousingcomplexJournalofUrbanAffairs 20 99-116
4. Bloom N D, 2008 Public Housing That Worked: New York in the Twentieth Century (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA)
5. Blomley N, 2007, Legal geographiesöKelo, contradiction, and capitalism Urban Geography 28198-205
6. Bohl C, 2000, New Urbanism and the city: potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods Housing Policy Debate 11 761-801
7. Bristol K G, 1991, The Pruitt-Igoe myth Journal of Architectural Education 44 163-171
8. Buron L, Popkin S, Levy D, Harris L, Khadduri J, 2002 The HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study: ASnapshotofthe Current Living Situation of Original Residents From Eight Sites Abt Associates and the Urban Institute,Washington, DC
9. CHA, 2002 Plan for Transformation Chicago Housing Authority, http://www.thecha.org/transformplan/plan_summary.html
10. Clampet-Lundquist S, 2004, HOPE VI relocation: moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties Housing Policy Debate 15 415-447
11. Clampet-Lundquist S, 2007, No more ball: the effect of relocation from public housing on adolescents Journal of Adolescent Research 22 298-323
12. Clark S L, 2002, Where the poor live: how federal housing policy shapes residential communities Urban Anthropology 31 69-92
13. CLPHA, 2003 HOPE VI: A Case for Reauthorization and Full Funding Council of Large Public Housing Authorities, http://www.clpha.org/page.cfm?pageID=282
14. CNU and USDHUD, 2000 Principles for Inner City Neighborhood Design Congress for the New Urbanism, San Francisco and US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC
15. Crump J, 2002, Deconcentration by demolition: public housing, poverty, and urban policy Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20 581-596
16. Cunningham L E, 2001, Islands of affordability in a sea of gentrification: lessons learned from the DC housing authority HOPE VI projects Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law 10 353-371
17. Davis A, 2008, Western Louisville home prices fall Louisville Courier-Journal 8 August, Section A, page 1
18. Day K, 2003, New Urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity Journal of Planning and Education Research 23 83-95
19. Elliot J R, Gotham K F, Milligan M J, 2004, Framing the urban: struggles over HOPE VI and New Urbanism in a historic city City and Community 3 373-402
20. Falconer Al-Hindi K, Staddon C, 1997, The hidden histories and geographies of neotraditional town planning: the case of Seaside, Florida Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15 349-372
21. Farnsworth C B, 2000, The 20th Annual builder choice: merit award: Park DuValle Builder 23174
22. Fraser J, Nelson M, 2008, Can mixed-income housing ameliorate poverty: the significance of a geographically informed sense of community Geography Compass 2 2127-2144
23. Fullilove M, 2004 Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do About It (One World/Ballantine Books, New York)
24. Gause J A, 2002 Great Planned Communities (The Urban Land Institute,Washington, DC)
25. Gilbert M R, 1997, Identity, space, and politics: a critique of the poverty debates, in Thresholds in Feminist Geography: Difference, Methodology, Representation Eds J P Jones III, H J Nast, SMRoberts(RowmanandLittlefield,Lanham,MD)pp 29-45
26. Goetz E G, 2000, The politics of poverty deconcentration and housing demolition Journal of Urban Affairs 22 157-173
27. Goetz E G, 2005, Comment: public housing demolition and the benefits to low-income families Journal of the American Planning Association 71 407-410
28. Gotham K F, Shefner J, Brumley K, 2001, Abstract space, social space, and the redevelopment of public housing Critical Perspectives on Urban Redevelopment 6 313-335
29. Greenblatt A, 2009, Obama and the cities Governing April, http://www.governing.com/articles/0904obama.htm
30. Hackworth J, 2003, Public housing and the rescaling of regulation in the USA Environment and Planning A 35 531-549
31. Hackworth J, 2004, The neoliberal turn and the restructuring of public housing policy in the United States Critical Planning 11 31-50
32. Hackworth J, 2005, Progressive activism in a neoliberal context: the case of efforts to retain public housing in the United States Studies in Political Economy 75 29-51
33. Hackworth J, 2007 The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
34. HAL, 1998 Park DuValle Revitalization Plan Housing Authority of Louisville, Louisville, KY
35. Harvey D, 1989, From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism Geografiska Annaler, Series B 71 3-17
36. Harvey D, 1997, The New Urbanism and the communitarian trap Harvard Design Magazine 1 68-69
37. Hays R A, 1995 The Federal Government and Urban Housing: Ideology and Change in Public Policy (SUNY Press, Albany, NY)
38. Helm H, 1986, The meanest street corner in Louisville Louisville Courier-Journal 5 October, section A, page 1
39. Henderson A S, 1995, Tarred with the exceptional image: public housing and popular discourse, 1950-1990 American Studies 36 31-53
40. Hirschhorn J S, Souza P, 2001 New Community Design to the Rescue: Fulfilling Another American Dream National Governor Association,Washington, DC
41. Joseph M L, 2006, Is mixed-income development an antidote to urban poverty? Housing Policy Debate 17 209-269
42. Katz M B, 1989 The Undeserving Poor: From the War on Poverty to the War on Welfare (Pantheon Books, New York)
43. Keating L, 2000, Redeveloping public housing: relearning urban renewal immutable lessons American Planning Association Journal 66 384-397
44. Keating L, Flores C L, 2000, Sixty and out:Techwood Homes transformed by enemies and friends Journal of Urban History 26 275-311
45. Kenny J T, Zimmerman J A, 2003, Constructing the genuine American city: neo-traditionalism, New Urbanism and neo-liberalism in the remaking of downtown Milwaukee Cultural Geographies 11 74-98
46. Kingsley G T, Johnson J, Pettit K L S, 2003, Patterns of Section 8 relocation in the HOPE VI program Journal of Urban Affairs 25 427-447
47. Kleit R G, 2005, HOPE VI new communities: neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing Environment and Planning A 37 1413-1441
48. LMHA, 2005 Moving to Work Annual Report, FY 2005 Louisville Metro Housing Authority, Louisville, KY
49. LMHA, 2006, Agency profile, Louisville Metro Housing Authority, Louisville, KY, http://www.lmha1.org/about/agencyprofile.htm
50. McCann E J, 1995, Neotraditional developments: the anatomy of a new urban form Urban Geography 16 210-233
51. McCarty M, 2009 HOPE VI Public Housing Revitalization Program: Background, Funding, and Issues (United States Congressional Research Service,Washington, DC)
52. Marcuse P, 1986, Housing policy and the myth of the benevolent state, in Critical Perspectives on Housing Eds R G Bratt, C Hartman, A Meyerson (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 248-263
53. NCSDPH,1992 The Final Reportofthe National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing: A Report to the Congress and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing,Washington, DC
54. Nenno M K, 1996 Ending the Stalemate: Moving Housing and Urban Development into the Mainstream of America's Future (University Press of America, Lanham, MD)
55. Newman K, Ashton P, 2004, Neoliberal urban policy and new paths of neighborhood change in the American inner city Environment and Planning A 36 1151-1172
56. O'Connor A, 2001 Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poorin Twentieth-century U.S. History (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
57. Peck J, Tickell A, 2002, Neoliberalizing space Antipode 34 381-404
58. Popkin S J, Levy D K, Harris L E, Comey J, Cunningham M K, 2004, The HOPE VI program: what about the residents? Housing Policy Debate 15 385-414
59. Popkin S J, Cunningham M K, Burt M, 2006, Public housing transformation and the hard-to-house Housing Policy Debate 16 1-24
60. Poynter C, 2004, The price of progress: Park DuValle development's success leaves some poor residents behind Louisville Courier-Journal 2 May, section A, page 1
61. Raffel J A, Denson L R, Varady D P, Sweeney S, 2003, Linking housing and public schools in the HOPE VI Public Housing Revitalization Program: a case study analysis of four developments in four cities, http://www.udel.edu/ccrs/pdf/LinkingHousing.pdf
62. Ray M, 2001, Park DuValle: an urban neighborhood is reborn Kentucky Banker Magazine issue 893, 20-21
63. Reichl A J, 1999, Learning from St. Thomas: community, capital, and the redevelopment of public housing in New Orleans Journal of Urban Affairs 21 169-187
64. Schnare A B, 1991, The preservation needs of public housing Housing Policy Debate 2 289-318
65. Shafer S, 2009, Some home assessments are dropping: effect of foreclosures hits western Louisville hardest Louisville Courier-Journal 11 April
66. Smith J L, 1999, Cleaning up public housing by sweeping out the poor Habitat International 23 49-62
67. Smith J L, 2000, The space of local control in the devolution of US public housing policy Geografiska Annaler, Series B 82 221-233
68. Smith N, 2002, New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy' Antipode 34 427-450
69. Talen E, 1999, Sense of community and neighborhood form: an assessment of the social doctrine of New Urbanism Urban Studies 36 1361-1379
70. Teaford J C, 2000, Urban renewal and its aftermath Housing Policy Debate 11 443-465
71. Till K, 1993, Neotraditional towns and urban villages: the cultural production of a geography of otherness Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11 709-732
72. Turbov M, Piper V, 2005 HOPE VIand Mixed-finance Redevelopments: ACatalyst for Neighborhood Renewal The Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program,Washington, DC
73. UDA, 2009, UDA projectsömixed-income urban neighborhoods, Urban Design Associates, http://www.urbandesignassociates.com/projectsMixed-income.asp
74. ULI, 2000, Summary report, national forum on encouraging market-rate infill housing development, Urban Land Institute, http://www.uli.org/ResearchAndPublications/Reports/Affordable%20Housing.aspx
75. ULI, 2002, Engaging the private sector in HOPE VI, Urban Land Institute, http://www.uli.org/ResearchAndPublications/Reports/Affordable%20Housing.aspx
76. US Bureau of the Census, 2003 2000 Census of Population and Housing http://factfinder.census.gov/
77. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC
78. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 1995, A special letter from the secretary: public housing transformation
79. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 1996a, Public housing that works: the transformation of America's public housing
80. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 1996b, The transformation of America's public housing: a 1996 status report
81. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 1998a Nationwide Audit, HOPE VI Urban Revitalization Program Office of Inspector General
82. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 1998b, A picture of subsidized households, http://www.huduser.org/datasets/assthsg/statedata98/index.html
83. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 1999a, HOPE VI: building communities transforming lives
84. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 1999b A New HUD: Opportunity for All, 1997. Consolidated Report
85. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 2000a, A promise being fulfilled: the transformation of America's public housing
86. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 2000b, An American challenge: mixed-income, mixed-use neighborhoods
87. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 2001, HOPE VI guidance: mixed-finance public housing development
88. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 2002, HOPE VI revitalization grant program: Park DuValle quarterly progress report'
89. USDHUD, US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC 2009, About HOPE VI, http://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/programs/ph/hope6/about/
90. USGAO, US General Accounting Office,
91. USGAO, US General Accounting Office 1998 HOPE VI: Progress and Problems in Revitalizing Distressed Public Housing
92. USGAO, US General Accounting Office 2002 HOPE VI: Leveraging has Increased, but HUD has not Met Annual Reporting Requirement
93. USGAO, US General Accounting Office 2003a Public Housing: HOPE VI Resident Issues and Changes in Neighborhoods Surrounding Grant Sites
94. USGAO, US General Accounting Office 2003b HUD's Oversight of HOPE VI Sites Needs to be More Consistent
95. Varady D P, Raffel J A, Sweeney S, Denson L, 2005, Attracting middle-income families in the HOPE VI public housing revitalization program Journal of Urban Affairs 27 149-164
96. Walfoort N, 1997, Park DuValle redevelopment attracts national attention Louisville Courier-Journal 16 December, section B, page 1
97. Wallace, J E, 1993 Current Status of HUD-insured (Or Held) Multifamily Rental Housing US Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington, DC
98. Weber R, 2002, Extracting value from the city: neoliberalism and urban redevelopment Antipode 34 519-540
99. Wyly E K, Hammel D J, 2000, Capital's metropolis: Chicago and the transformation of American housing policy Geografiska Annaler, Series B 82 181-206
100. Wyly E K, Hammel D J, 2001, Gentrification, housing policy, and the new context of urban redevelopment Critical Perspectives on Urban Redevelopment 6 211-276
101. Zielenbach S, 2003a, Catalyzing community development: HOPE VI and neighborhood revitalization Journal of Affordable Housing 13 40-80
102. Zielenbach S, 2003b, Assessing economic change in HOPE VI neighborhoods Housing Policy Debate 14 621-655
103. Zipperer J, 2005, A new Louisville neighborhood rises Affordable Housing Finance August, http://www.housingfinance.com/ahf/articles/2005/august/030_AHF_12-3.htm