Assignation of sweet cherry selections to 3 taste groupings based on perceived sweetness and sourness

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Ross, Carolyn F ^a   Chauvin, Maite A ^a   Whiting, Matthew ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multinomial logit model; Sensory; Sweet cherry; Taste grouping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CITRUS FRUIT; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRUNUS; TASTE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CITRUS; COLOR; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRUNUS; TASTE; WASHINGTON;

PRUNUS AVIUM;

EID: 74249110628     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01410.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bartoshuk LM. 1975. Taste mixtures: is mixture suppression related to compression? Physiol Behav 14 : 654 649.
2. Cliff MA, Dever MC, Hall JW, Girard B. 1995. Development and evaluation of multiple regression models for prediction of sweet cherry liking. Food Res Int 28 : 583 589.
3. Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P. 2003. Consumer acceptance of "Brooks" and "Bing" cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol Technol 28 : 159 167.
4. Dever MC, MacDonald RA, Cliff MA, Lane WD. 1996. Sensory evaluation of sweet cherry cultivars. HortScience 31 : 150 153.
5. Jaeger SR, Rossiter K, Lau K. 2005. Consumer perceptions of novel fruit and familiar fruit: a repertory grid application. J Sci Food Agric 85 : 480 488.
6. Kappel F, Fisher-Fleming B, Hogue E. 1996. Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry. HortScience 31 : 443 446.
7. Martin N. 2002. Sweet/sour balance in champagne wine and dependence on taste/odour interactions. Food Qual Pref 13 : 295 305.
8. McBride RL, Johnson RL. 1987. Perception of sugar-acid mixtures in lemon juice drink. J Food Sci Technol 22 : 399 408.
9. Meilgaard M, Civille G, Carr T. 1999. Sensory evaluation techniques. 3rd ed. New York : CRC Press. 387 p.
10. Moskowitz HR, Munoz AM, Gacula M. 2003. Viewpoints and controversies in sensory science and consumer product testing. Trumbull, Conn. : Food & Nutrition Press. 477 p.
11. Poole N, Baron L. 1996. Consumer awareness of citrus fruit attributes. Brit Food J 98 : 23 28. (Pubitemid 126047300)
12. Schifferstein HN, Frijters JER. 1990. Sensory integration in citric acid/sucrose mixtures. Chem Senses 15 : 87 109.
13. Small KA, Hsiao C. 1985. Multinomial logit specification tests. Int Econ Rev 26 : 619 627.
14. Spayd SE, Tarara JM, Mee DL, Ferguson JC. 2002. Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot berries. Am J Enol Vitic 53 : 171 182.
15. Usenik V, Fabcic J, Stampar F. 2008. Sugars, organic acids, phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Food Chem 107 : 185 192.
16. Whiting MD. 2003. Home-grown: sweet cherries from the WSU-Prosser breeding program. Proc Wash St Hort Soc 98 : 53 6.
17. Whiting MD, Long L, Marin A. 2007. Consumers respond well to stem-free cherries. Good Fruit Grower 58 : 14.