Good results with an uncemented proximally HA-coated stem in hip revision surgery: 62 Hips followed for 2-13 years

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 184-193

  Salemyr, Mats O F ^a   Sköldenberg, Olof G ^a   Bodén, Henrik S G ^a   Ahl, Torbjörn E ^a   Adolphson, Per Y ^a  

^a DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BONE REMODELING; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP FRACTURE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; CEMENTATION; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE REMODELING; CEMENTATION; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44249102331     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17453670710014969     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berry D J, Harmsen W S, Ilstrup D, Lewallen D G, Cabanela M E. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop 1995; (319): 168-77.
2. Berry D J. Cemented femoral revision. In: Hip surgery: materials and developments (Eds. Sedel L, Cabanela M E). Martin Duniz, London 1998: 287.
3. Bodén H, Salemyr M, Sköldenberg O, Ahl T, Adolphson P. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated tapered titanium stem. Excellent results at a minimum of 10-years follow-up in 104 hips. J Orthop Sci 2006; 11 (2): 175-9.
4. Bohm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem. Evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83 (7): 1023-31.
5. Brooker A F, Bowerman J W, Robinson R A, Riley L H Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1973; 55 (8): 1629-32.
6. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972; 54 (1): 61-76.
7. Crawford C H, Malkani A L, Incavo S I, Morris H B, Krupp R J, Baker D. Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (1): 8-13.
8. Dohmae Y D, Bechtold J E, Sherman R E, Puno R M, Gustilo R B. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; (236): 214-20.
9. Eisler T, Svensson O, Iyer V, Wejkner B, Schmalholz A, Larsson H, Elmstedt E. Revision total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (8): 974-81.
10. Eldridge J D, Smith E J, Hubble M J, Whitehouse S L, Learmonth I D. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (5): 535-40.
11. Emerson R H Jr, Head W C, Higgins L L. Clinical and radiographic analysis of the Mallory-Head femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum 8.8-year and average eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003: 85 (10): 1921-6.
12. Engelbrecht E, Siegel A. Endo-Klinik klassifikation. Radiologe 1989; 29 (10): 508-18.
13. Engh C A, Bobyn J D. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; (231): 7-28.
14. Engh C A, Bobyn J D, Glassman A H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69 (1): 45-55.
15. Engh C A, Massin P, Suthers K E. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 1990; (257): 107-28.
16. Engh C A Jr, McAuley J P, Sychterz C J, Sacco M E, Engh C A Sr. The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. A post-mortem analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2000; 82 (10): 1414-20.
17. Furlong R J, Osborn J F. Fixation of hip prostheses by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatings. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73 (5): 741-5.
18. Geesink R G, de Groot K, Klein C P. Chemical implant fixation using hydroxyl-apatite coatings. The development of a human total hip prosthesis for chemical fixation to bone using hydroxyl-apatite coatings on titanium substrates. Clin Orthop 1987; (225): 147-70.
19. Gie G A, Linder L, Ling R S, Simon J P, Slooff T J, Timperley A J. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75 (1): 14-21.
20. Gustilo R B, Pasternak H S. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop 1988; (235): 111-9.
21. Halliday B R, English H W, Timperley A J, Gie G A, Ling R S. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003; 85 (6): 809-17.
22. Haydon C M, Mehin R, Burnett S, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B, McCalden R W, MacDonald S J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86 (6): 1179-85.
23. Huiskes R. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop 1990; (261): 27-38.
24. Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 2000; 24 (3): 139-42.
25. Kelly S J, Incavo S J, Beynnon B. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (1): 64-71.
26. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlstedt B. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67 (6): 541-4.
27. Lawrence J M, Engh C A, Macalino G E, Lauro G R. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76 (7): 965-73.
28. Mahoney C R, Fehringer E V, Kopjar B, Garvin K L. Femoral revision with impaction grafting and a collarless, polished, tapered stem. Clin Orthop 2005; (432): 181-7.
29. Malchau H, Kärrholm J, Wang Y X, Herberts P. Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (5): 418-24.
30. Malkani A L, Lewallen D G, Cabanela M E, Wallrichs S L. Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (4): 411-8.
31. Moreland J R, Moreno M A. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop 2001; (393): 194-201.
32. Mulliken B D, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clin Orthop 1996; (325): 156-62.
33. Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzén H, Johnsson R, Sandquist P, Sundberg M. Early complications after one hundred and fourty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84 (8): 1323-8.
34. Paprosky W G, Greidanus N V, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999; (369): 230-42.
35. Pekkarinen J, Alho A, Lepistö J, Ylikoski M, Ylinen P, Paavilainen T. Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. A high incidence of complications. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2000; 82 (1): 103-7.
36. Peters C L, Riviero D P, Kull L R, Jacobs J J, Rosenberg A G, Galante J O. Revision total hip arthroplasty without cement: subsidence of proximally porous-coated femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77 (8): 1217-26.
37. Rahbek O, Kold S, Bendix K, Overgaard S, Søballe K. Superior sealing effect of hydroxyapatite in porous-coated implants: experimental studies on the migration of polyethylene particles around stable and unstable implants in dogs. Acta Orthop 2005; 76 (3): 375-85.
38. Raman R, Kamath R P, Parikh A, Angus P D. Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87 (8): 1061-7.
39. Reikerås O, Gunderson R B. Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10-16 years. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (1): 98-103.
40. Rosenberg A. Cementless total hip arthroplasty: femoral remodeling and clinical experience. Orthopaedics 1989; 12 (9): 1223-33.
41. Suominen S, Santavirta S. Revision total hip replacement using the bias proximal porous-coated femoral component. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1996; 85 (4): 347-51.
42. Trikha S P, Singh S, Raynham O W, Lewis J C, Mitchell P A, Edge A J. Hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral stems in revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87 (8): 1055-60.
43. Turner T M, Sumner D R, Urban R M, Rivero D P, Galante J O. A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68 (9): 1396-409.
44. Ullmark G, Hallin G, Nilsson O. Impacted corticocancellous allografts and cement for revision of the femur component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (2): 140-9.
45. van Biezen F C, ten Have B L, Verhaar J A. Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery. 21 hips followed for 41-85 months. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (2): 135-42.
46. Wagner H. Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss. Orthopäde 1987; 16 (4): 295-300.