The on-line application of binding principle A in english as a second language

Bilingualism

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 485-502

  Felser, Claudia ^a   Sato, Mikako ^a   Bertenshaw, Nicholas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74149083179     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909990228     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Akamatsu, N. (1999). The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 11, 381-403.
2. Allan, D. (1992). The Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Badecker, W. & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748-769.
4. Baumann, H., Nagengast, J. & Klaas, G. (1993). New Experimental Setup (NESU). Ms., Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
5. B̈uring, D. (2005). Binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
7. Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3-42.
8. Cole, P. & Sung, L.-M. (1994). Head movement and longdistance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 355-406.
9. Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
10. Demirci, M. (2000). The role of pragmatics in reflexive interpretation by Turkish learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 325-353.
11. Eckman, F. (1994). Local and long-distance anaphora in secondlanguage acquisition. In E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition, pp. 207-225. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Felser, C. & Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23, 9-36.
13. Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005a). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A reviewof methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21, 175-198.
14. Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005b). Ambiguities and anomalies: What can eye-movements and event-related potentials reveal about second language sentence processing? In J. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, pp. 268-281. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
15. Grier, J. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424-429.
16. Harrington, M. & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25-38.
17. Harris, T., Wexler, K. & Holcomb, P. (2000). An ERP investigation of binding and coreference. Brain and Language, 75, 313-346.
18. Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Hirakawa, M. (1990). A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research, 6, 60-85.
20. Hornby, A. S. (2000). Oxford advanced learners dictionary of current English (6th edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing, and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199-225.
22. Juffs, A. (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21, 121-151.
23. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lee, K.-Y. (2008). The role of pragmatics in reflexive interpretation in Korean learners of English. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpĩńan & R. Bhatt (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum, pp. 97-112. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
25. Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C. & Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 53-78.
26. Matsumura, M. (1994). Japanese learners' acquisition of the locality requirement of English reflexives: Evidence for retreat from overgeneralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 19-42.
27. McElree, B. & Griffith, T. (1995). Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 134-157.
28. McElree, B. & Griffith, T. (1998). Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 432-460.
29. Nagata, H. (1995). On-line and off-line reflexive resolution in Japanese logophoric sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 205-229.
30. Nicol, J. & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5-20.
31. Nicol, J. & Swinney, D. (2003). The psycholinguistics of anaphora. In A. Barss (ed.), Anaphora: A reference guide, pp. 72-104. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Oshima, D. (2007). On empathic and logophoric binding. Research on Language & Computation, 5, 19-35.
33. Pollack, I. & Norman, D. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of signal detection experiments. Psychonomic Science, 1, 125-126.
34. Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1992). Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 261-303.
35. Reinhart, T. (1981). Definite NP anaphora and c-command. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 605-635.
36. Reinhart, T. & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 657-720.
37. Roberts, L., Gullberg, M. & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333-357.
38. Runner, J., Sussman, R. & Tanenhaus, M. (2003). Assignment of reference to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases: Evidence from eye-movements. Cognition, 89, B1-B13.
39. Runner, J., Sussman, R. & Tanenhaus, M. (2006). Assigning reference to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases. Cognitive Science, 30, 1-49.
40. Scḧutze, C. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Staub, A. & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements and online comprehension processes. In M. Gaskell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, pp. 327-342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 542-562.
43. Thomas, M. (1991). Universal grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language, 67, 211-239.
44. Ullman, M. (2005). A cognitive perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice, pp.141-178. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
45. Walther, C. (1995). Processing reflexives in coordinate NPs: A question of point-of-view. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 39-78.
46. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. White, L., Bruhn-Garavito, J., Kawasaki, T., Pater, J. & Pŕevost, P. (1997). The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: Problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding. Language Learning, 47, 145-172. (Pubitemid 127055901)
48. Williams, J., M̈obius, P.&Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 509-540.
49. Xiang, M., Dillon, B. & Phillips, C. (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain and Language, 108, 40-55.