Left ventricular end-diastolic area is a measure of cardiac preload in patients with early septic shock

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 759-765

  Scheuren, Karoline ^a   Wente', Moritz N ^a   Hainer, Christian ^a   Scheffler, Matthias ^b   Lichtenstern, Christoph ^b   Martin, Eike ^a   Schmidt, Jan ^a   Bopp, Christian ^a   Weigand, Markus A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac preload; Central venous pressure; Echocardiography; Septic shock; Stroke volume; Transoesophageal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD VOLUME; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEART INDEX; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART PRELOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; SEPTIC SHOCK; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART OUTPUT; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SHOCK, SEPTIC; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 74049133364     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832a3a9c     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alberti C, Brun-Buisson C, Goodman SV, et al. Influence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis on outcome of critically ill infected patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168:77-84.
2. Annane D, Aegerter P, Jars-Guincestre MC, Guidet B. Current epidemiology of septic shock: the CUB-Rea Network. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168:165-172.
3. Brun-Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, Vallet B, EPISEPSIS Study Group. EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:580-588.
4. Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J, et al., French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. JAMA 1995; 274:968-974.
5. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1546-1554.
6. Engel C, Brunkhorst FM, Bone HG, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis in Germany: results from a national prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:606-618.
7. Vincent JL, Taccone F, Schmit X. Classification, incidence, and outcomes of sepsis and multiple organ failure. Contrib Nephrol 2007; 156:64-74.
8. Lichtenstern C, Schmidt J, Knaebel HP, etal. Postoperative bacterial/fungal infections: a challenging problem in critically ill patients after abdominal surgery. Dig Surg 2007; 24:1-11.
9. Russell JA. Management of sepsis [published correction] in N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2267.
10. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1699-1713.
11. Weigand MA, Bardenheuer HJ, Bottiger BW. Clinical management of patients with sepsis [in German]. Anaesthesist 2003; 52:3-22.
12. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368-1377.
13. Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, et al. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. JAm Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:1030-1035.
14. Beale RJ, Hollenberg SM, Vincent JL, Parrillo JE. Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:S455-S465.
15. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock [published corrections] in Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1448
16. and Crit Care Med 2004; 32:2169-2170. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:858-873
17. Raper R, Sibbald WJ. Misled by the wedge? The Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest 1986; 89:427-434.
18. Cheatham ML, Nelson LD, Chang MC, Safcsak K. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index as a predictor of preload status in patients on positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:1801-1806.
19. Diebel LN, Myers T, Dulchavsky S. Effects of increasing airway pressure and PEEP on the assessment ofcardiac preload. JTrauma 1997; 42:585-590; discussion 590-591.
20. Durham R, Neunaber K, Vogler G, et al. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a measure of preload. J Trauma 1995; 39:218-223; discussion 223-224.
21. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Boisante L, et al. Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on left ventricular performance. N Engl J Med 1981; 304:387-392.
22. Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Zeravik J, Pfeiffer UJ. Intrathoracic blood volume accurately reflects circulatory volume status in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1992; 18:142-147.
23. Sakka SG, Bredle DL, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison between intrathoracic blood volume and cardiac filling pressures in the early phase of hemodynamic instability of patients with sepsis or septic shock. J Crit Care 1999; 14:78-83.
24. Cheung AT, Savino JS, Weiss SJ, et al. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic indexes ofleft ventricular preload in patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function. Anesthesiology 1994; 81 :376-387.
25. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, etal. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:1313-1321.
26. Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:351-355.
27. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Cur rOpin CritCare 2006; 12:249-254.
28. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138.
29. Perner A, Faber T. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:1068-1073.
30. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:746-755.
31. Bone RC, Sibbald WJ, Sprung CL. The ACCP-SCCM consensus conference on sepsis and organ failure. Chest 1992; 101:1481-1483
32. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/ SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1250-1256.
33. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308.
34. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699.
35. Reich DL, Konstadt SN, Nejat M, et al. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for the detection ofcardiac preload changes induced by transfusion and phlebotomy in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:10-15.
36. Wolrab C, Weber T, Tschernich H, et al. Assessment of left ventricular preload: transesophageal echocardiography versus filling pressure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 1997; 111:283-286.
37. Buhre W, Buhre K, Kazmaier S, et al. Assessment of cardiac preload by indicator dilution and transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18:662-667.
38. Greim CA, Roewer N, Apfel C, et al. Relation ofechocardiographic preload indices to stroke volume in critically ill patients with normal and low cardiac index. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23:411-416.
39. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:392-398.
40. Bindels AJ, van der Hoeven JG, Graafland AD, etal. Relationships between volume and pressure measurements and stroke volume in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2000; 4:193-199.
41. Buhre W, Weyland A, Buhre K, et al. Effects of the sitting position on the distribution of blood volume in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:354-357.
42. Goedje O, Seebauer T, Peyerl M, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring by double-indicator dilution technique in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation. Chest 2000; 118:775-781.
43. Hinder F, Poelaert JI, Schmidt C, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular volume status by transoesophageal echocardiography and dye dilution during cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15:633-640.
44. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, et al. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 2003; 124:1900-1908.
45. Hofer CK, Furrer L, Matter-Ensner S, etal. Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:748-755.
46. Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, et al. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:2339-2343.