Exposure to high static or pulsed magnetic fields does not affect cellular processes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Bioelectromagnetics

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 28-38

  Anton Leberre, Veronique ^a,b,c   Haanappel, Evert ^d,e   Marsaud, Nathalie ^a,c   Trouilh, Lidwine ^a,c   Benbadis, Laurent ^a,b   Boucherie, Helian ^b   Massou, Sophie ^d,f   François, Jean M ^a,b,c  

^a INSA   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c Parc Scientifique de Luminy   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^e INSTITUT DE PHARMACOLOGIE ET DE BIOLOGIE STRUCTURALE   (France)

^f AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Magnetic field effects; Metabolism; Morphology; Proteome; Yeast gene expression

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; METABOLISM; YEAST;

CELLULAR PROCESS; FIELD EXPOSURE; GENES EXPRESSION; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MAGNETIC-FIELD EFFECTS; PULSED MAGNETIC FIELDS; SINGLE-SHOT; STATIC MAGNETIC FIELDS; YEAST GENE EXPRESSION; YEAST SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

GENE EXPRESSION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 74049104478     PISSN: 01978462     EISSN: 1521186X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20523     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Biochip Platform. 2009. The list of the corresponding genes spotted on the DNA chips can be found at http://biopuce.insatoulouse. fr/old/oligosets/.
2. Blamire AM. 2008. The technology of MRI - The next 10 years? Br J Radiol 81:601-617.
3. Botstein D, Fink GR. 1988. Yeast: An experimental organism for modern biology. Science 240:1439-1443.
4. Boucherie H, Dujardin G, Kermorgant M, Monribot C, Slonimski P, Perrot M. 1995. Two-dimensional protein map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Construction of gene-protein index. Yeast 11:601-613.
5. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, Boeke JD. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115-132.
6. Bras W, Diakun GP, Díaz JF, Maret G, Kramer H, Bordas J, Medrano FJ. 1998. The susceptibility of pure tubulin to high magnetic fields: A magnetic birefringence and X-ray fiber diffraction study. Biophys J 74:1509-1521.
7. CalMorph program. 2009. CalMorph image analysis software informations can be found at http://yeast.gi.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ datamine/calmorph/.
8. Cot M, Loret MO, François J, Benbadis L. 2007. Physiological behaviour of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in aerated fed-batch fermentation for high level production of bioethanol. FEMS Yeast Res 7:22-32.
9. Coulton LA, Harris PA, Barker AT, Pockley AG. 2004. Effect of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on the induction of heat-shock protein gene expression in human leukocytes. Radiat Res 161:430-434.
10. Denegre JM, Valles JM, Lin K, Jordan WB, Kimberly LM. 1998. Cleavage planes in frog eggs are altered by strong magnetic fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:14729-14732.
11. Eguchi Y, Ueno S, Kaito C, Sekimizu K, Shiokawa K. 2006. Cleavage and survival of Xenopus embryos exposed to 8 T static magnetic fields in a rotating clinostat. Bioelectromagnetics 27:307-313.
12. Goto Y, Taniura H, Yamada K, Hirai T, Sanada N, Nakamichi N, Yoneda Y. 2006. The magnetism responsive gene Ntan1 in mouse brain. Neurochem Int 49:334-341.
13. Gray JV, Petsko GA, Johnston GC, Ringe D, Singer RA, Werner-Washburne M. 2004. "Sleeping beauty": Quiescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. MMBR 68:187-206.
14. Henderson B, Kind M, Boeck G, Helmberg A, Wicket G. 2006. Gene expression profiling of human endothelial cells exposed to 50-Hz magnetic fields fails to produce regulated candidate genes. Cell Stress Chaperones 11:227-232.
15. Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y. 1990. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med 9:811-818.
16. Hölzel R. 1997. Electrorotation of single yeast cells at frequencies between 100 Hz and 1.6 GHz. Biophys J 73:1103-1109.
17. Ikehata M, Iwasaka M, Miyakoshi J, Ueno S, Koana T. 2003. Effects of intense magnetic fields on sedimentation pattern and gene expression profile in budding yeast. J Appl Phys 93:6724-6726.
18. Leszczynski D. 2005. Rapporteur report: Cellular, animal and epidemiological studies of the effects of static magnetic fields relevant to human health. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87:247-253.
19. Lin H, Han L, Blank M, Head M, Goodman R. 1998. Magnetic field activation of protein-DNA binding. J Cell Biochem 70:297-303.
20. Lin H, Blank M, Goodman R. 1999. A magnetic field-responsive domain in the human HSP70 promoter. J Cell Biochem 75:170-176.
21. LNCMP "Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Pulsés". 2009. http://www.lncmp.org/une/GB/index.html.
22. Luceri C, De Filippo C, Giovannelli L, Blangiardo M, Cavalieri D, Glietti F, Pampaloni M, Andreuccetti D, Pieri L, Bambi F, Biggeri A, Dolara P. 2005. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields do not affect DNA damage and gene expression profiles of yeast and human lymphocytes. Radiat Res 164:277-285.
23. Maret G, von Schickfus M, Mayer A, Dransfeld K. 1975. Orientation of nucleic acids in high magnetic fields. Phys Rev Lett 35:397-400.
24. McCann J, Dietrich F, Rafferty C. 1998. The genotoxic potential of electric and magnetic fields: An update. Mutat Res 411:45-86.
25. Mills DR. 1941. Differential staining of living and dead yeast cells. Food Res 6:365-382.
26. Nakasono S, Laramee C, Saiki H, McLeod KJ. 2003. Effect of power-frequency magnetic fields on genome-scale gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Radiat Res 160: 25-37.
27. Ohtani M, Saka A, Sano F, Ohya Y, Morishita S. 2004. Development of image processing program for yeast cell morphology. J Bioinform Comput Biol 1:695-709.
28. Paul AL, Ferl RJ, Meisel MW. 2006. High magnetic field induced changes of gene expression in arabidopsis. Biomagn Res Technol 4:7.
29. Perrot M, Guieysse-Peugeot AL, Massoni A, Espagne C, Claverol S, Monteiro R, Silva M, Jenö P, Santos M, Bonneu M, Boucherie H. 2007. Yeast proteome map (update 2006). Proteomics 7:1117-1120.
30. Rogers CT, Hore PJ. 2009. Chemical magnetoreception in birds: The radical pair mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 353-360.
31. Ruiz-Gomez MJ, Prieto-Barcia MI, Ristori-Bogajo E, Martinez-Morillo M. 2004. Static and 50 Hz magnetic fields of 0.35 and 2.45mT have no effect on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioelectrochemistry 64:151-155.
32. Saito TL, Ohtani M, Sawai H, Sano F, Saka A, Watanabe D, Yukawa M, Ohya Y, Morishita S. 2004. SCMD: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Morphological Database. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D319-D322.
33. Saito TL, Sese J, Nakatani Y, Sano F, Yukawa M, Ohya Y, Morishita S. 2005. Data mining tools for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae morphological database. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W753-W757.
34. Schenck JF. 2000. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:2-19.
35. Simon MD, Geim AK. 2001. Diamagnetic levitation: Flying frogs and floating magnets. J Appl Phys 87:6200-6204.
36. Torbet J, Dickens MJ. 1984. Orientation of skeletal-muscle actin in strong magnetic-fields. FEBS Lett 173:403-406.
37. Ueno S, Iwasaka M. 1994. Properties of diamagnetic fluid in high gradient magnetic fields. J Appl Phys 75:7177-7179.
38. Valiron O, Peris L, Rikken G, Schweitzer A, Saoudi Y, Remy C, Job D. 2005. Cellular disorders induced by high magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:334-340.