Gene expression profiling of human endothelial cells exposed to 50-Hz magnetic fields fails to produce regulated candidate genes

Cell Stress and Chaperones

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 227-232

  Henderson, Blair ^a   Kind, Michaela ^a   Boeck, Guenther ^a   Helmberg, Arno ^a   Wick, Georg ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE NUMBER; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAGNETIC FIELD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENES, REGULATOR; HUMANS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; UMBILICAL VEINS;

EID: 33748428323     PISSN: 13558145     EISSN: 14661268     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1379/CSC-196.1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ahlbom IC, Cardis E, Green A, Linet M, Savitz D, Swerdlow A. 2001. Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health. Environ Health Perspect 109 Suppl 6: 911-933.
2. Bernhard D, Huck CW, Jakschitz T, Pfister G, Henderson B, Bonn GK, Wick G. 2004. Development and evaluation of an in vitro model for the analysis of cigarette smoke effects on cultured cells and tissues. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 50: 45-51.
3. Blank M, Goodman R. 1999. Electromagnetic fields may act directly on DNA. J Cell Biochem 75: 369-374.
4. Bodega G, Forcada I, Suarez I, Fernandez B. 2005. Acute and chronic effects of exposure to a 1-mT magnetic field on the cytoskeleton, stress proteins, and proliferation of astroglial cells in culture. Environ Res 98: 355-362.
5. De Mattei M, Gagliano N, Moscheni C, et al. 2005. Changes in polyamines, c-myc and c-fos gene expression in osteoblast-like cells exposed to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 26: 207-214.
6. Henderson B, Tagwerker A, Mayrl C, et al. 2003a. Progression of arteriovenous bypass restenosis in mice exposed to a 50 Hz magnetic field. Cell Stress Chaperones 8: 373-380.
7. Henderson BR, Pfister G, Boeck G, Kind M, Wick G. 2003b. Expression levels of heat shock protein 60 in human endothelial cells in vitro are unaffected by exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields. Cell Stress Chaperones 8: 172-182.
8. Ivancsits S, Diem E, Pilger A, Rudiger HW, Jahn O. 2002. Induction of DNA strand breaks by intermittent exposure to extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields in human diploid fibroblasts. Mutat Res 519: 1-13.
9. Juutilainen J, Huuskonen H, Komulainen H. 1997. Increased resorptions in CBA mice exposed to low-frequency magnetic fields: an attempt to replicate earlier observations. Bioelectromagnetics 18: 410-417.
10. Kang KI, Bouhouche I, Fortin D, Baulieu EE, Catelli MG. 1998. Luciferase activity and synthesis of Hsp70 and Hsp90 are insensitive to 50Hz electromagnetic fields. Life Sci 63: 489-497.
11. Lai H, Singh NP. 2004. Magnetic-field-induced DNA strand breaks in brain cells of the rat. Environ Health Perspect 112: 687-694.
12. Lin H, Head M, Blank M, Han L, Jin M, Goodman R. 1998. Myc-mediated transactivation of HSP70 expression following exposure to magnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 69: 181-188.
13. Loscher W, Wahnschaffe U, Mevissen M, Lerchl A, Stamm A. 1994. Effects of weak alternating magnetic fields on nocturnal melatonin production and mammary carcinogenesis in rats. Oncology 51: 288-295.
14. Luceri C, Filippo CD, Giovannelli L, et al. 2005. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields do not affect DNA damage and gene expression profiles of yeast and human lymphocytes. Radiat Res 164: 277-285.
15. Morehouse CA, Owen RD. 2000. Exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields does not alter HSP70 expression or HSF-HSE binding in HL60 cells. Radiat Res 153: 658-662.
16. Nakasono S, Laramee C, Saiki H, McLeod KJ. 2003. Effect of power-frequency magnetic fields on genome-scale gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Radiat Res 160: 25-37.
17. Quackenbush J. 2002. Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet 32: 496-501.
18. Savitz DA, Liao D, Sastre A, Kleckner RC, Kavet R. 1999. Magnetic field exposure and cardiovascular disease mortality among electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol 149: 135-142.
19. Simko M, Mattsson MO. 2004. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields as effectors of cellular responses in vitro: possible immune cell activation. J Cell Biochem 93: 83-92.
20. Sobel E, Dunn M, Davanipour Z, Qian Z, Chui HC. 1996. Elevated risk of Alzheimer's disease among workers with likely electromagnetic field exposure. Neurology 47: 1477-1481.
21. Wertheimer N, Leeper E. 1979. Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 109: 273-284.
22. Wettenhall JM, Smyth GK. 2004. limmaGUI: a graphical user interface for linear modeling of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20: 3705-3706.
23. Wolf FI, Torsello A, Tedesco B, et al. 2005. 50-Hz extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields enhance cell proliferation and DNA damage: possible involvement of a redox mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta 1743: 120-129.
24. Yokus B, Cakir DU, Akdag MZ, Sert C, Mete N. 2005. Oxidative DNA damage in rats exposed to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. Free Radic Res 39: 317-323.