Assessing fluid responses after coronary surgery: Role of mathematical coupling of global end-diastolic volume to cardiac output measured by transpulmonary thermodilution

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 954-960

  Breukers, Rose Marieke B G E ^a   De Wilde, Rob B P ^b,c   Van den Berg, Paul C M ^b,c   Jansen, Jos R C ^b,c   Faes, Theo J C ^c   Twisk, Jos W R ^c   Groeneveld, A B Johan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Continuous pulmonary thermodilution cardiac output; Fluid responses; Mathematical coupling; Transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output; Volumes versus pressures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLLOID; CONTINUOUS PULMONARY THERMODILUTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FLUID LOADING; FLUID THERAPY; GLOBAL ENDDIASTOLIC BLOOD VOLUME INDEX; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOVOLEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PATIENT MONITORING; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; THERMODILUTION; TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; SWAN GANZ CATHETER;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; HYPOVOLEMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STROKE VOLUME; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 74049086718     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833098c6     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Gödje O, Peyerl M, Seebauer T, et al. Central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and intrathoracic blood volumes as preload indicators in cardiac surgery patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998; 13:533-539.
2. Hinder F, Poelaert JI, Schmidt C, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular volume status by transoesophageal echocardiography and dye dilution during cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15:633-640.
3. Bindels AJGH, van der Hoeven JG, Graafland AD, et al. Relationships between volume and pressure measurements and stroke volume in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2000; 4:193-199.
4. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Keyl C, Rödig G. Assessment of intrathoracic blood volume as an indicator of cardiac preload: single transpulmonary thermodilution technique versus assessment of pressure preload parameters derived from a pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001; 15:584-588.
5. Brock H, Gabriel C, Bibl D, Necek S. Monitoring intravascular volumes for postoperative volume therapy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19:288-294.
6. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Moerstedt K, et al. Intrathoracic blood volume index measured by thermodilution for preload monitoring after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16:191-195.
7. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:392-398.
8. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93:782-788.
9. Hofer CK, Müller SM, Furrer L, et al. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing offpump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128:848-854.
10. Hofer CK, Furrer L, Matter-Ensner S, et al. Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:748-755.
11. Nirmalan M, Willard TM, Edwards DJ, et al. Estimation of errors in determining intrathoracic blood volume using the single transpulmonary thermal dilution technique in hypovolemic shock. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:805-812.
12. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:746-775.
13. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172-178.
14. McLuckie A, Bihari D. Investigating the relationship between intrathoracic blood volume index and cardiac index. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26:1376-1378.
15. Buhre W, Kazmaier S, Sonntag H, Weyland A. Changes in cardiac output and intrathoracic blood volume: mathematical coupling of data? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45:863-867.
16. Moreno LF, Stratton HH, Newell JC, Feustel PJ. Mathematical coupling of data: correction of a common error for linear calculations. J Appl Physiol 1986; 60:335-343.
17. Stratton HH, Feustel PJ, Newell JC. Regression of calculated variables in the presence of shared measurement error. J Appl Physiol 1987; 62:2083-2093.
18. Squara P. Mathematic coupling of data: a frequently misused concept. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:1916-1921.
19. Gödje O, Peyerl M, Seebauer T, et al. Reproducibility of double indicator dilution measurements of intrathoracic blood volume compartments, extravascular lung water, and liver function. Chest 1998; 113:1070-1077.
20. Gust R, Gottschalk A, Bauer H, et al. Cardiac output measurement by transpulmonary versus conventional thermodilution technique in intensive care patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12:519-522.
21. Gödje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:2407-2412.
22. Zöllner C, Haller M, Weis M, et al. Beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac output by intravascular pulse contour analysis: a prospective criterion standard study in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14:125-129.
23. Mielck F, Buhre W, Hanekop G, et al. Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17:211-212.
24. Sander M, von Heymann C, Foer A, et al. Pulse contour analysis after normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2005; 9:R729-R734.
25. Hüter L, Schwarzkopf KR, Preussler NP, et al. The level of cardiac output affects the relationship and agreement between pulmonary artery and transpulmonary aortic thermodilution measurements in an animal model. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21:659-663.
26. Haller M, Zöllner C, Briegel J, Forst H. Evaluation of a new continuous thermodilution cardiac output monitor in critically ill patients: a prospective criterion standard study. Crit Care Med 1995; 23:860-866.
27. Siegel LC, Hennesy MM, Pearl RG. Delayed time response of the continuous cardiac output pulmonary artery catheter. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:1173-1177.
28. Lazor MA, Pierce ET, Stanley GD, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy and response time of STAT-mode continuous cardiac output. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth 1997; 11:432-436.
29. Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comp 1999; 15:85-91.
30. Medin DL, Brown DT, Wesley R, et al. Validation of continuous thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients with analysis of systemic errors. J Crit Care 1999; 82:525-530.
31. Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, et al. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs. thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:525-530.
32. Rauch H, Müller M, Fleischer F, et al. Pulse contour analysis versus thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46:424-429.
33. Bendjelid K, Schütz N, Suter PM, Romand JA. Continuous cardiac output monitoring after cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison with bolus thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:919-922.
34. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/ VigileoTM system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:329-336.
35. Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ, et al. Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26:180-187.
36. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Meth Med Res 1999; 8:135-160.
37. Myles PS, Cui J, Editorial I. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesthesia 2007; 99:309-311.