Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 936-941

  Oncel, Banu ^a   Dinc, Umut Asli ^a   Orge, Faruk ^a   Yalvaç, Belkis Ilgaz ^a  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Corneal hysteresis; Corneal thickness; Dynamic contour tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Noncontact tonometry; Ocular response analyzer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYSTERESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; NONCONTACT TONOMETRY; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 73949114592     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210901900607     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Gold-mann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38: 1-30.
2. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassenein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115: 592-6.
3. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1389-92.
4. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Gordon MO, Kass M. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) Group. Central corneal thickness and measured IOP response to topical ocular hypotensive medication in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 717-22.
5. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, noncontact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 851-4.
6. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and operated eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 746-51.
7. Kaufman C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3790-4.
8. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presenting a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 344-50.
9. Luce D. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156-62.
10. Martinez de la Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4410-4.
11. Herndon LW, Weizer JS, Stinnest SS. Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for advanced glaucoma damage. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 17-21.
12. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975; 53: 34-43.
13. Stodtmeister R. Central corneal thickness on GAT (Goldmann applanation tonometry accuracy). J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 543.
14. Brandt JD. The influence of corneal thickness on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2001; 10: S65-7.
15. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 367-408.
16. Gunvant P, Oleary DJ, Baskaran M, Broadway DC, Watkins RJ, Vijaya L. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 337-43.
17. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson P, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 39-47.
18. Kaufmann C, Bahmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3118-21.
19. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 20-6.
20. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurementcomparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 2-6.
21. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243: 763-7.
22. Lanza M, Borrelli M, De Bernardo M, Filosa ML, Rosa N. Corneal parameters and difference between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes. J Glaucoma 2008; 17: 460-4.
23. Pelit A, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Pelit A, Akova Y. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, Canon TX-10 noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects. Clin Exp Optom Epub 2008.
24. Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Viestenz A. Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison between TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry-a clinical study of 323 normal eyes. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2006; 223: 813-9.
25. Annette H, Kristina L, Mark-Oliver F, Wolfgang W. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 2008; 17: 361-5.
26. Stabuc Silih M, Hawlina M. Einfluss der Hornhautdicke auf vergleichende Intraokulardruckmessungen mit dem Goldmann-und Non-Contact Tonometer bei Keratokonus. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2003; 220: 843-7.
27. Ko YC, Liu CL, Hsu WM. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers. Eye 2005; 19: 327-32.