E-government implementation perspective: Setting objective and strategy

International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 59-77

  Shareef, Mahmud Akhter ^a   Kumar, Vinod ^a   Kumar, Uma ^a   Chowdhury, Abdul Hannan ^b   Misra, Subhas C ^c  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (Bangladesh)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; E Government (EG); Government policy; Implementation; Objective; Strategy; Success

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; E-GOVERNMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; OBJECTIVE; STRATEGY; SUCCESS;

COMPETITION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PUBLIC POLICY;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 73949089591     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2010102005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Accenture. (2003). E-government leadership - realizing the vision. The Government Executive Series. New York: Author.
2. Accenture. (2005). Leadership in customer service: New expectations, new experiences. New York: Author.
3. Al-Mashari, M. (2007). A benchmarking study of experiences with electronic-government. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 14(2), 172-185. doi:10.1108/14635770710740378
4. Aldrich, D., Bertot, J. C., & McClure, C. R. (2002). E-government: Initiatives, developments, and issues. Government Information Quarterly, 19(4), 349-355. doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(02)00130-2 (Pubitemid 36002896)
5. All About Market Research. (2008). Internet world stats. Retrieved from http://www.allaboutmarketresearch.com/internet.htm
6. ASTEC. (1994). The networked nation. Retrieved from http://www.disr.gov. au/science/pmseic/pmseic.html
7. Basu, S. (2004). E-government and developing countries: An overview. International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109-132. doi:10.1080/13600860410001674779 (Pubitemid 38803900)
8. Cardin, L., Holmes, B. J., Leganza, G., Hanson, J., & McEnroe, W. (2006). Who are Canada's e-government consumers? Canadian demographics, tech attitudes, and purchasing power. Boston: Forrester.
9. Chaney, P., & Fevre, R. (2002). Is there a demand for descriptive representative? Evidence from the UK's devolution program. Political Studies, 50(5), 897-915. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00399 (Pubitemid 36046900)
10. Christy, O. (2002, April 3). Study: More Americans become e-citizens. CNN.com.
11. Dada, D. (2006). The failure of e-government in developing countries. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/informationSystems/iSChannel/ Dada-2006b.pdf
12. Damodaran, L., Nicholls, J., & Henney, A. (2005). The contribution of sociotechnical systems thinking to the effective adoption of e-government and the enhancement of democracy. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3(1), 1-12.
13. European Union. (2005). An application if this strategy by a member state is the e-envoy office set up by the UK government. Retrieved from http://www.e-envoy.gov.uk/
14. Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. (2006). E-government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 207-235. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.004 (Pubitemid 44172059)
15. Fang, Z. (2002). E-government in digital era: Concept, practice and development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Information, 20, 193-213.
16. Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266-290. doi:10.1016/j.giq. 2006.04.005
17. Guijarro, L. (2007). Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 89-101. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.05.003 (Pubitemid 44849126)
18. Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18, 101-112. doi:10.1080/01972240290075039
19. Heeks, R. (2003). Most egovernment-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced? (iGovernment working paper no. 14). Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.
20. Heeks, R. B., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing egovernment research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
21. Howard, M. (2001). E-government across the globe: How will "e" change government? Government Finance Review, 17(4), 6-9.
22. ICA. (2006). ICA report. Retrieved from http://www.ica-it.org/conf40/ docs/Conf40-country-report-Mexico.pdf
23. IMF. (2008). World economic outlook database-October 2008. Washington, DC: Author.
24. Kaaya, J. (2009). Determining types of services and targeted users of emerging e-government strategies: The case of Tanzania. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(2), 16-36.
25. Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42-50. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.09.002
26. Krishna, S., & Walsham, G. (2005). Implementing public information systems in developing countries: Learning from a success story. Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 123-140. doi:10.1002/itdj.20007
27. Lee, S., Tan, X., & Trimi, S. (2005). Current practices of leading e-government countries. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 99-104. doi:10.1145/1089107.1089112 (Pubitemid 43906476)
28. Leyland, P. (2003). Devolution, the British Constitution and the distribution of power. The Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 53(4), 408-434.
29. Madon, S. (2004). Evaluating the developmental impact of e-governance initiatives: An exploratory framework. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20(5), 1-13.
30. McCall, C., & Williamson, A. (2002). Governance and Democracy in Northern Ireland: The role of the voluntary and community sector after the agreement. Governance, 14(3), 363-384. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00165 (Pubitemid 33297995)
31. Melitski, J. (2001). The world of e-government and e-governance. Retrieved from http://www.aspanet.org/solutions/TheWorld of E-government and Egovernance.htm
32. Morison, J. (2000). The government-voluntary sector compacts: Governance, governmentality, and civil society. Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 98-112. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00148
33. Murru, M. L. (2003). E-government: From real to virtual democracy. Retrieved from http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:g7Oz58sY2c0J:unpan1.un.org/ intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNPAN/UNPAN011094.pdf+E-Eovernment: +from+Real+to+Virtual+Democracy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1.
34. National Performance Review. (1993). Office of the Vice President, reengineering government through IT. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.npr.gov/library/reports/it.html
35. Ndou, V. D. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries,18(1), 1-24.
36. Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64-75. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x
37. Noveck, B. S. (2003). Designing deliberative democracy in cyberspace: The role of the cyberlawyer. Boston University Journal of Science and Technology, 9, 1-91.
38. Okot-Uma, R. W.-O., & Caffrey, L. (Eds.). (2000). Trusted services and public key infrastructure. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
39. Prins, C. (2001). Electronic government: Variations on a concept. In J. E. J. Prins (Ed.), Designing egovernment (pp. 1-5). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Law International.
40. Reddick, C. G. (2006). Information resource managers and e-government effectiveness: A survey of Texas state agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 249-266. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.006 (Pubitemid 44172060)
41. Reddick, C. G. (2009). Factors that explain the perceived effectiveness of e-government: A survey of United States city government information technology directors. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(2), 1-15.
42. Robin, G., Andrew, G., & Sasha, M. (2009). How responsive is e-government? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 69-74. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.02.002
43. Sandoval, R., & Gil-García, J. R. (2005). Assessing e-government evolution in Mexico: A preliminary analysis of the state portals. Paper presented at the 2005 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, San Diego, CA.
44. Schedler, K., & Summermatter, L. (2007). Customer orientation in electronic government: Motives and effects. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 291-311. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.05.005
45. Shareef, M. A., Kumar, U., & Kumar, V. (2007). Developing fundamental capabilities for successful e-government implementation. Paper presented at the ASAC Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
46. Shareef, M. A., Kumar, U., Kumar, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2009). Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-government. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 6(1), 70-96. doi:10.1504/ EG.2009.022594
47. SITA (Pty) Ltd. (2002). Government experience in South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.sita.co.zae
48. Snavely, E. C. (2002). e-Government evolution: The Richardson, Texas, experience. Government Finance Review, 34-36.
49. Titah, R., & Barki, H. (2005). E-government adoption and acceptance: A literature review. Montréal, Quebec, Canada: HEC Montréal.
50. Trusler, J. (2003). South African e-government policy and practices: A framework to close the gap. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), EGOV 2003 (LNCS 2739, pp. 504-507).
51. Turner, M., & Desloges, C. (2002). Strategies and framework for government on-line: A Canadian experience. Paper presented at the World Bank E-Government Learning Workshop, Washington,
52. DC. United Nations. (2003). Department of Economic and Social Affairs report World Public Sector 2003: Egovernment at the crossroads. New York: Author.
53. Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2008). Assessing egovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717-733. doi:10.1016/j.giq. 2007.06.002
54. Weerakkody, V., & Dhillon, G. (2008). Moving from e-government to t-government: A study of process reengineering challenges in a UK local authority context. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(4), 1-16.
55. White House. (2000). Welcome to the White House. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/New/html/e-government.html