Variation in sexual selection in fishes

Fish Behaviour

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 303-335

  Ahnesjö, Ingrid ^a   Forsgren, Elisabet ^b,c   Kvarnemo, Charlotta ^d  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73549094884     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (162)

1. Ahnesjö, I. 1995. Temperature affects male and female potential reproductive rates differently in the sex-role reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Behavioral Ecology 6: 229-233.
2. Ahnesjo, I., C. Kvarnemo and S. Merilaita. 2001. Using potential reproductive rates to predict mating competition among individuals qualified to mate. Behavioral Ecology 12: 397-401.
3. Almada, V.C., E.J. Gonçalves, R.F. Oliveira and A.J. Santos. 1995. Courting females: Ecological constraints affect sex roles in a natural population of the blenniid fish Salaria pavo. Animal Behaviour 49: 1125-1127.
4. Amundsen, T. 2003. Fishes as models in studies of sexual selection and parental care. Journal of Fish Biology 63: 17-52.
5. Amundsen, T. and E. Forsgren. 2003. Male preference for colourful females affected by male size in a marine fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54: 55-64.
6. Andersson, M.B. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
7. Andersson, M. and Y. Iwasa. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 53-58.
8. Andersson, M. and L.W. Simmons. 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 296-302.
9. Arnold, S.J. and D. Duvall. 1994. Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. American Naturalist 143: 317-348.
10. Arnold, S.J. and M.J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution 38: 709-719.
11. Arnqvist, G. and L. Rowe. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
12. Balshine-Earn, S. 1996. Reproductive rates, operational sex ratios and mate choice in St. Peter’s fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 39: 107-116.
13. Balshine-Earn, S. and B.J. McAndrew. 1995. Sex-role reversal in the black-chinned tilapia Sarotherodonmelanotheron (Rueppel) (Cichlidae). Behaviour 132: 861-874.
14. Berglund, A. 1993. Risky sex: male pipefishes mate at random in the presence of a predator. Animal Behaviour 46: 169-175.
15. Berglund, A. 1994. The operational sex ratio influences choosiness in a pipefish. Behavioural Ecology 5: 254-258.
16. Berglund, A. and G. Rosenqvist. 2003. Sex role reversal in pipefish. Advances in the Study of Behavior 32: 131-167.
17. Borg, Å.A., E. Forsgren and C. Magnhagen. 2002. Plastic sex roles in the common goby-the effect of nest availability. Oikos 98: 105-115.
18. Boughman, J.W. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature (London) 411: 944-948.
19. Breden, F. and G. Stoner. 1987. Male predation risk determines female preference in the Trinidad guppy. Nature (London) 329: 831-833.
20. Brooks, R. and J.A. Endler. 2001. Female guppies agree to differ: Phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55: 1644-1655.
21. Candolin, U. 1997. Predation risk affects courtship and attractiveness of competing threespine stickleback males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41: 81-87.
22. Candolin, U. 2004. Effects of algae cover on egg acquisition in male three-spined stickleback. Behaviour 141: 1389-1399.
23. Candolin, U., T. Salesto and M. Evers. 2007. Changed environmental conditions weaken sexual selection in sticklebacks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 233-239.
24. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 41-47.
25. Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2007. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318: 1882-1885.
26. Clutton-Brock, T.H. and G.A. Parker. 1992. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 437-456.
27. Cotton, S., D.W. Rogers, J. Small, A. Pomiankowski and K. Fowler. 2006. Variation in preference for a male ornament is positively associated with female eyespan in the stalk-eyed fly Diasemopsis meigenii. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273: 1287-1292.
28. Crowley, P.H., S.E. Travers, M.C. Linton, S.L. Cohn, A. Sih and R.C. Sargent. 1991. Mate density, predation risk, and the seasonal sequence of mate choices: a dynamic game. American Naturalist 137: 567-596.
29. Emlen, S.T. and L.W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215-223.
30. Endler, J.A. 1983. Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 9: 173-190.
31. Endler, J.A. 1987. Predation, light intensity, and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces, Poeciliidae). Animal Behaviour 35: 1376-1385.
32. Endler, J.A. 1991. Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Research 31: 587-608.
33. Endler, J.A. 1995. Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 22-29.
34. Endler, J.A. and A.E. Houde. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49: 456-468.
35. Engström-öst, J. and U. Candolin. 2007. Human-induced water turbidity alters selection on sexual displays in sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology 18: 393-398.
36. Evans, J.P., J.L. Kelley, I.W. Ramnarine and A. Pilastro. 2002. Female behaviour mediates male courtship under predation risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52: 496-502.
37. Fisher, H.S., B.B. Wong and G.G. Rosenthal. 2006. Alteration of the chemical environment disrupts communication in a freshwater fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273: 1187-1193.
38. Fleming, I.A. 1996. Reproductive strategies of Atlantic salmon: ecology and evolution. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6: 379-416.
39. Fleming, I.A. and M.R. Gross. 1989. Evolution of adult female life history and morphology in pacific salmon (Coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution 43: 141-157.
40. Fleming, I.A. and J.D. Reynolds. 2004. Salmonid breeding systems. In: Evolution Illuminated. Salmon and their Relatives, A.P. Hendry and S.C. Stearns (eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 264-294.
41. Foote, C.J. 1988. Male mate choice dependent on male size in salmon. Behaviour 106: 63-80.
42. Forsgren, E. 1992. Predation risk affects mate choice in a gobiid fish. American Naturalist 140: 1041-1049.
43. Forsgren, E. 1997a. Female sand gobies prefer good fathers over dominant males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264: 1283-1286.
44. Forsgren, E. 1997b. Mate sampling in a population of sand gobies. Animal Behaviour 53: 267-276.
45. Forsgren, E. and C. Magnhagen. 1993. Conflicting demands in sand gobies: Predators influence reproductive behaviour. Behaviour 126: 125-135.
46. Forsgren, E., C. Kvarnemo and K. Lindström. 1996. Modes of sexual selection determined by resource abundance in two sand goby populations. Evolution 50: 646-654.
47. Forsgren, E., J.D. Reynolds and A. Berglund. 2002. Behavioural ecology of reproduction in fish. In: Hand Book of Fish Biology and Fisheries, P.J.B. Hart and J.D. Reynolds (eds.). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, Vol. 1: Fish Biology, pp. 225-247.
48. Forsgren, E., T. Amundsen, Å.A. Borg and J. Bjelvenmark. 2004. Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature (London) 429: 551-554.
49. Foster, S.J. and A.C.J. Vincent. 2004. Life history and ecology of seahorses: Implications for conservation and management. Journal of Fish Biology 65: 1-61.
50. Gamble, S., A.K. Lindholm, J.A. Endler and R. Brooks. 2003. Environmental variation and the maintenance of polymorphism: The effect of ambient light spectrum on mating behaviour and sexual selection in guppies. Ecology Letters 6: 463-472.
51. Gillooly, J.F., E.L. Charnov, G.B. West, V.M. Savage and J.H. Brown. 2002. Effects of size and temperature on developmental time. Nature (London) 417: 70-73.
52. Godin, J.G.J. 1995. Predation risk and alternative mating tactics in male Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Oecologia 103: 224-229.
53. Gonçalves, D., T. Fagundes and R. Oliveira. 2003. Reproductive behaviour of sneaker males of the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 63: 528-532.
54. Grant, J.W.A. and P.E. Foam. 2002. Effect of operational sex ratio on female-female versus male-male competitive aggression. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 2242-2246.
55. Grant, J.W.A., M.J. Bryant and C.E. Soos. 1995. Operational sex ratio, mediated by synchrony of female arrival, alters the variance of male mating success in Japanese medaka. Animal Behaviour 49: 367-375.
56. Grant, J.W.A., C.L. Gaboury and H.L. Levitt. 2000. Competitor-to-resource ratio, a general formulation of operational sex ratio as a predictor of competitive aggression in Japanese medaka (Pisces: Oryziidae). Behavioral Ecology 11: 670-675.
57. Gross, M.R. 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 92-98.
58. Hamon, T.R. 2005. Measurement of concurrent selection episodes. Evolution 59: 1096-1103.
59. Head, M.L. and R. Brooks. 2006. Sexual coercion and the opportunity for sexual selection in guppies. Animal Behaviour 71: 515-522.
60. Heinsohn, R., S. Legge and J.A. Endler. 2005. Extreme reversed sexual dichromatism in a bird without sex role reversal. Science 309: 617-619.
61. Heppell, S.S., S.A. Heppell, F.C. Coleman and C.C. Koenig. 2006. Models to compare management options for a protogynous fish. Ecological Applications 16: 238-249.
62. Heubel, K.U. and I. Schlupp. 2006. Turbidity affects association behaviour in male Poecilia latipinna. Journal of Fish Biology 68: 555-568.
63. Higashi, M., G. Takimoto and N. Yamamura. 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature (London) 402: 523-526.
64. Hutchings, J.A., T.D. Bishop and C.R. McGregor-Shaw. 1999. Spawning behaviour of Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua: Evidence of mate competition and mate choice in a broadcast spawner. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 97-104.
65. Jarvenpaa, M. and K. Lindström. 2004. Water turbidity by algal blooms causes mating system breakdown in a shallow-water fish, the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 2361-2365.
66. Jennions, M.D. and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews 72: 283-327.
67. Jirotkul, M. 1999. Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Animal Behaviour 58: 287-294.
68. Johnstone, R.A., J.D. Reynolds and J.C. Deutsch. 1996. Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50: 1382-1391.
69. Jones, A.G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, S.J. Arnold and J.C. Avise. 2000. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 677-680.
70. Jones, A.G., D. Walker, C. Kvarnemo, K. Lindström and J.C. Avise. 2001a. How cuckoldry can decrease the opportunity for sexual selection: data and theory from a genetic parentage analysis of the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 9151-9156.
71. Jones, A.G., D. Walker, K. Lindström, C. Kvarnemo and J.C. Avise. 2001b. Surprising similarity of sneaking rates and genetic mating patterns in two populations of sand goby experiencing disparate sexual selection regimes. Molecular Ecology 10: 461-469.
72. Jones, A.G., G.I. Moore, C. Kvarnemo, D. Walker and J.C. Avise. 2003. Sympatric speciation as a consequence of male pregnancy in seahorses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 6598-6603.
73. Jones, A.G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund and J.C. Avise. 2005. The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman’s principles: An experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 874-884.
74. Jones, J.C. and J.D. Reynolds. 1999. The influence of oxygen stress on female choice for male nest structure in the common goby. Animal Behaviour 57: 189-196.
75. Kelley, C.D., J.G.J. Godin and J.M. Wright. 1999. Geographical variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266: 2403-2408.
76. Kodric-Brown, A. 1988. Effects of sex-ratio manipulations on territoriality and spawning success of male pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis. Animal Behaviour 36: 1136-1144.
77. Kokko, H. and M. Jennions. 2003. It takes two to tango. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 103-104.
78. Kokko, H. and R.A. Johnstone. 2002. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 357: 319-330.
79. Kokko, H. and P. Monaghan. 2001. Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecology Letters 4: 159-165.
80. Kokko, H. and D.J. Rankin. 2006. Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 361: 319-334.
81. Kokko, H., M.D. Jennions and R. Brooks. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37: 43-66.
82. Kraak, S.B.M. and T.C.M. Bakker. 1998. Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: attractive males choose big females, which lay big eggs. Animal Behaviour 56: 859-866.
83. Kvarnemo, C. 1994. Temperature differentially affects male and female reproductive rates in the sand goby: consequences for operational sex ratio. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 256: 151-156.
84. Kvarnemo, C. 1996. Temperature affects operational sex ratio and intensity of male-male competition: An experimental study of sand gobies, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behavioral Ecology 7: 208-212.
85. Kvarnemo, C. 1997. Food affects the potential reproductive rates of sand goby females but not of males. Behavioral Ecology 8: 605-611.
86. Kvarnemo, C. 2006. Evolution and maintenance of male care: Is increased paternity a neglected benefit of care? Behavioral Ecology 17: 144-148.
87. Kvarnemo, C. and I. Ahnesjö. 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 404-408.
88. Kvarnemo, C. and I. Ahnesjö. 2002. Operational sex ratios and mating competition. In: Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods, I.C.W. Hardy (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 366-382.
89. Kvarnemo, C. and E. Forsgren. 2000. The influence of potential reproductive rates and variation in mate quality on male and female choosiness in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 48: 378-384.
90. Kvarnemo, C. and S. Merilaita. 2006. Mating distribution and its temporal dynamics affect operational sex ratio: A simulation study. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 89: 551-559.
91. Kvarnemo, C., E. Forsgren and C. Magnhagen. 1995. Effects of sex ratio on intra-and intersexual behaviour in sand gobies. Animal Behaviour 50: 1455-1461.
92. Kvarnemo, C., G.I. Moore and A.G. Jones. 2007. Sexually selected females in the monogamous Western Australian seahorse. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274: 521-525.
93. Langerhans, R.B., C.A. Layman and T.J. DeWitt. 2005. Male genital size reflects a trade off between attracting mates and avoiding predators in two live-bearing fish species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of America 102: 7618-7623.
94. LeBas, N.R. 2006. Female finery is not for males. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 170-173.
95. Lehtonen, T. and K. Lindström. 2004. Changes in sexual selection resulting from novel habitat use in the sand goby. Oikos 104: 327-335.
96. Lima, S.L. and L.M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation-A review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 619-640.
97. Lindström, K. 2001. Effects of resource distribution on sexual selection and the cost of reproduction in sandgobies. American Naturalist 158: 64-74.
98. Lindström, K. and T. Seppä. 1996. The environmental potential for polygyny and sexual selection in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 1319-1323.
99. Locatello, L., M.B. Rasotto, J.P. Evans and A. Pilastro. 2006. Colourful male guppies produce faster and more viable sperm. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 1595-1602.
100. Long, K.D. and G. Rosenqvist. 1998. Changes in male guppy courting distance in response to a fluctuating light environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 44: 77-83.
101. Lopez, S. 1999. Parasitized female guppies do not prefer showy males. Animal Behaviour 57: 1129-1134.
102. Lorch, P.D., S. Proulx, L. Rowe and T. Day. 2003. Condition dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 867-881.
103. Magnhagen, C. 1991. Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 183-186.
104. Magnhagen, C. 1992. Alternative reproductive behaviour in the common goby, Pomatoschistus microps: an ontogenetic gradient? Animal Behaviour 44: 182-184.
105. Magurran, A.E. 2001. Sexual conflict and evolution in Trinidadian guppies. Genetica 112-113: 463-474.
106. Magurran, A.E. and M.A. Nowak. 1991. Another battle of the sexes: the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 246: 31-38.
107. Mank, J.E. 2007. Mating preferences, sexual selection and patterns of cladogenesis in rayfinned fishes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 597-602.
108. Matsumoto, K. and Y. Yanagisawa. 2001. Monogamy and sex role reversal in the pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus. Animal Behaviour 61: 163-170.
109. Mazzi, D. 2004. Parasites make male pipefish careless. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 519-527.
110. Milinski, M. 2003. The function of mate choice in sticklebacks: Optimizing Mhc genetics. Journal of Fish Biology 63 (Supplement A): 1-16.
111. Millar, N.P., D.N. Reznick, M.T. Kinnison and A.P. Hendry. 2006. Disentangling the selective factors that act on male colour in wild guppies. Oikos 113: 1-12.
112. Miller, L.K. and R. Brooks. 2005. The effects of genotype, age, and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behaviour, and attractiveness. Evolution 59: 2414-2425.
113. Mills, S.C. and J.D. Reynolds. 2003. Operational sex ratio and alternative reproductive behaviours in the European bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54: 98-104.
114. Morrow, E.H. and C. Fricke. 2004. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 2395-2401.
115. Neff, B.D. and T.E. Pitcher. 2005. Genetic quality and sexual selection: An integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology 14: 19-38.
116. Okuda, N. 1999. Sex roles are not always reversed when the potential reproductive rate is higher in females. American Naturalist 153: 540-548.
117. Oliveira, R.F., V.C. Almada, E. Forsgren and E.J. Gonçalves. 1999. Temporal variation in male traits, nesting aggregations and mating success in the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 54: 499-512.
118. Olsen, E.M., M. Heino, G.R. Lilly, M.J. Morgan, J. Brattey, B. Ernande and U. Dieckmann. 2004. Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature (London) 428: 932-935.
119. Owens, I.P.F. and D.B.A. Thompson. 1994. Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 258: 93-99.
120. Parker, G.A. 1983. Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Mate Choice, P. Bateson (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 141-166.
121. Parker, G.A. and L.W. Simmons. 1996. Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 315-321.
122. Parker, P.G. and T.A. Waite. 1997. Mating systems, effective population size, and conservation of natural populations. In: Behavioral Approaches to Conservation in the Wild, J.R. Clemmons and R. Buchholz (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 243-261.
123. Petersen, C.W. and R.R. Warner. 1998. Sperm competition in fishes. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, T.R. Birkhead and A.P. Møller (eds.). Academic Press, London.
124. Pettersson, L.B., I.W. Ramnarine, S.A. Becher, R. Mahabir and A.E. Magurran. 2004. Sex ratio dynamics and fluctuating selection pressures in natural populations of the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55: 461-468.
125. Poulin, R. 1994. Mate choice decisions by parasitized female upland bullies, Gobiomorphus breviceps. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 256: 183-187.
126. Proulx, S.R. 1999. Mating systems and the evolution of niche breadth. American Naturalist 154: 89-98.
127. Ptasek, M.B. and J. Travis. 1997. Male choice in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipenna. Evolution 51: 1217-1231.
128. Queller, D.C. 1997. Why do females care more than males? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264: 1555-1557.
129. Real, L. 1990. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. American Naturalist 136: 376-404.
130. Real, L. 1991. Search theory and mate choice. II. Mutual interaction, assortative mating, and equilibrium variation in male and female fitness. American Naturalist 138: 901-917.
131. Reynolds, J.D. 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 68-72.
132. Reynolds, J.D. and J.C. Jones. 1999. Female preference for preferred males is reversed under low oxygen conditions in the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps). Behavioral Ecology 10: 149-154.
133. Reynolds, J.D., N.K. Dulvy, N.B. Goodwin and J.A. Hutchings. 2005. Biology of extinction risk in marine fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272: 2337-2344.
134. Rice, W.R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
135. Rowe, S. and J.A. Hutchings. 2003. Mating systems and the conservation of commercially exploited marine fish. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 567-572.
136. Rowe, S. and J.A. Hutchings. 2006. Sound production by Atlantic cod during spawning. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135: 529-538.
137. Schluter, D. and T. Price. 1993. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 253: 117-122.
138. Seehausen, O., J.J.M. van Alphen and F. Witte. 1997. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277: 1808-1811.
139. Shibata, J. and M. Kohda. 2006. Seasonal sex role changes in the blenniid Petroscirtes breviceps, a nest brooder with paternal care. Journal of Fish Biology 69: 203-214.
140. Shuster, S.M. and M.J. Wade. 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
141. Sih, A., A.M. Bell, J.C. Johnson and R.E. Ziemba. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview. Quarterly Review of Biology 79: 241-277.
142. Simmons, L.W. and C. Kvarnemo. 2006. Costs of breeding and their effects on the direction of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273: 465-470.
143. Simmons, L.W. and G.A. Parker. 1996. Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: Can sperm competition affect the direction of sexual competition? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 515-519.
144. Singer, A., C. Kvarnemo, K. Lindstrom and O. Svensson. 2006. Genetic mating patterns studied in pools with manipulated nest site availability in two populations of Pomatoschistus minutus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 1641-1650.
145. Spence, R. and C. Smith. 2005. Male territoriality mediates density and sex ratio effects on oviposition in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Animal Behaviour 69: 1317-1323.
146. Stockley, P., M.J.G. Gage, G.A. Parker and A.P. Møller. 1996. Female reproductive biology and the co-evolution of ejaculate characteristics in fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 451-458.
147. Stockley, P., M.J.G. Gage, G.A. Parker and A.P. Møller. 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: The evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. American Naturalist 149: 933-954.
148. Taborsky, M. 1998. Sperm competition in fish: ‘Bourgeois’ males and parasitic spawning. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 222-227.
149. Trivers, R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971, B.G. Campbell (ed.). Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136-179.
150. Vincent, A.C.J. and Y. Sadovy. 1998. Reproductive ecology in the conservation and management of fishes. In: Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology, T. Caro (ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 209-245.
151. Vincent, A., I. Ahnesjö, A. Berglund and G. Rosenqvist. 1992. Pipefishes and seahorses: Are they all sex role reversed? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 237-241.
152. Vincent, A., I. Ahnesjö and A. Berglund. 1994. Operational sex ratios and behavioural sex differences in a pipefish population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34: 435-442.
153. Wade, M.J. and S.M. Shuster. 2002. The evolution of parental care in the context of sexual selection: A critical reassessment of parental investment theory. American Naturalist 160: 285-292.
154. Ward, J.L. and D.A. McLennan. 2006. Changes in agonistic, courtship and parental displays of the male brook stickleback, Culeainconstans, across the breeding cycle. Behaviour 143: 33-56.
155. Wedekind, C. 1996. Lek-like spawning behaviour and different female mate preferences in roach (Rutilus rutilus). Behaviour 133: 681-695.
156. Wedell, N., C. Kvarnemo, C.M. Lessells and T. Tregenza. 2006. Sexual conflict and life histories. Animal Behaviour 71: 999-1011.
157. Whitlock, M. 2000. Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection. Evolution 54: 1855-1861.
158. Widemo, F. and S.A. Sæther. 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: Causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 26-31.
159. Wilson, A.B., I. Ahnesjö, A.C.J. Vincent and A. Meyer. 2003. The dynamics of male brooding, mating patterns, and sex roles in pipefishes and seahorses (family Syngnathidae). Evolution 57: 1374-1386.
160. Wong, B.B.M., U. Candolin and K. Lindström. 2007. Environmental deterioration compromises socially-enforced signals of male quality in three-spined sticklebacks. American Naturalist 170: 184-189.
161. Wootton, R.J. 1990. Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Chapman & Hall, London.
162. Wootton, R.J., D.A. Fletcher, C. Smith and F.G. Whoriskey. 1995. A review of reproductive rates in sticklebacks in relation to parental expenditure and operational sex ratios. Behaviour 132: 915-933.