A comparative analysis of angular cephalometric values between CBCT generated lateral cephalograms versus digitized conventional lateral cephalograms;Analyse comparative des valeurs céphalométriques de céphalogrammes latéraux générés par CBCT versus céphalogrammes latéraux conventionnels

International Orthodontics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 308-321

  Chung, Raymond R ^a   Lagravere, Manuel O ^b   Flores Mir, Carlos ^b   Heo, Giseon ^b   Carey, Jason P ^b   Major, Paul W ^b  

^a Pratique Privée   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cephalometry; Cone Beam Computed Tomography; Orthodontics; Reliability

Indexed keywords

EID: 73449146010     PISSN: 17617227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1761-7227(09)73505-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brodie AG. Cephalometric roentgenology; history, technics and uses. J Oral Surg (Chic) 1949;7:185-198.
2. Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The effect of projection errors on angular measurements in cephalometry. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:353-361.
3. Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The effect of projection errors on cephalometric length measurements. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:141-148.
4. Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The cephalometric projection. Part II. Principles of image distortion in cephalography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1983;12:101-108.
5. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod 1971;60:505-517.
6. Hägg U, Cooke MS, Chan TC, Tng TT, Lau PY. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks : an experimental study on skulls. Aust Orthod J 1998;15:177-185.
7. Malkoc S, Sari Z, Usumez S, Koyuturk AE. The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:315-321.
8. Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification. Angle Orthod 1996;66:51-60.
9. Perillo M, Beideman R, Shofer F, et al. Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements : guidelines for cephalometric analyses. Clin Orthod Res 2000;3:29-36.
10. Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M, Hansson LG. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:331-340.
11. Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility : a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:165-170.
12. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique : preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558-1564.
13. Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur J Radiol 2008;66:396-418.
14. Small BW. Cone beam computed tomography. Gen Dent 2007;55:179-181.
15. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:75-80.
16. Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics : benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66:434-444.
17. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed conebeam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:551-559.
18. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:10-17.
19. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:263-269.
20. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:534-542.
21. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:410-416.
22. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:803-811.
23. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:550-560.
24. Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008;78:873-879.
25. Chidiac JJ, Shofer FS, Al-Kutoub A, Laster LL, Ghafari J. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002;5:104-113.
26. Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:111-116.
27. Baumrind S. Current clinical research in orthodontics : a perspective. J Calif Dent Assoc 2006; 34:831-834.
28. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005;32:282-293.
29. Lou L, Lagravère MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area : a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:402-411.
30. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:825-833.
31. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering : implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33:170-176.
32. Lagravère MO, Major PW. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:657-660.
33. Cooke MS, Wei SH. Cephalometric errors : a comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs. Aust Dent J 1991;36:38-43.
34. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH, Attarzadeh F. Porion and condyle as cephalometric landmarks--an error study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:411-415.
35. Mora B, Ebert DS. Low-complexity maximum intensity projection. ACM Trans Graph 2005;24:1392-1416.
36. Schreiner S, Paschal CB, Galloway RL. Comparison of projection algorithms used for the construction of maximum intensity projection images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:56-67. (Pubitemid 26044030)
37. Bruntz LQ, Palomo JM, Baden S, Hans MG. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:340-348.