Comparison of projection algorithms used for the construction of maximum intensity projection images

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 56-67

  Schreiner, Steven ^a,d   Paschal, Cynthia B ^a,c   Galloway, Robert L ^a,b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging, angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging, physics and instrumentation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; CONVOLUTION; INTERPOLATION; MAGNETISM; RAY TRACING; RESONANCE;

INTENSITY PROJECTION IMAGES; INTERPOLATION KERNELS; LINEAR INTERPOLATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING PHYSICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, PHYSIC AND INSTRUMENTATION; MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION; NEAREST NEIGHBOR INTERPOLATION; PROJECTION ALGORITHMS; PROJECTION METHOD;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030028916     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199601000-00012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Castillo M. Diagnosis of disease of the common carotid artery bifurcation: CT angiography vs. catheter angiography. AJR 1993;161:395-8.
2. Marks MP, Napel S, Jórdan JE, Enzmann DR. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography. AJR 1993;160:1267-71.
3. Napel S, Marks MP, Rubin GD, et al. CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology 1992;185:607-10.
4. Napel S, Rubin GD, Jeffrey RB. STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:832-8.
5. VanDyke CW, Modic MT, Beale SM, Amartur S, Ross JS. 3D MR myelography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:497- 500.
6. Wesbey GE, Bergan JJ, Moreland SI, et al. Cerebrovascular magnetic resonance angiography: a critical verification. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:619-32.
7. Pan XM, Anderson CM, Reilly LM, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid artery combining two- and three-dimensional acquisitions. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:609-18.
8. Hertz SM, Baum RA, Owen RS, Holland GA, Logan DR, Carpenter JP. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and contrast arteriography in peripheral arterial stenosis. Am J Surg 1993;166:112-6.
9. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, Shapeero LG, Lee RE. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR 1990;154:623-9.
10. Haacke EM, Masaryk TJ, Wielopolski PA, et al. Optimizing blood vessel contrast in fast three-dimensional MRI. Magn Res Med 1990;14:202-21.
11. Laub G. Displays for MR angiography. Magn Res Med 1991;14:222-9.
12. Rossnick S, Laub G, Braeckle G, et al. Three dimensional display of blood vessels in MRI. In: Computers in cardiology. Boston: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1987:193-6.
13. Wolberg G. Digital image warping. 1st ed. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990.
14. Hou HS, Andrews HC. Cubic splines for image interpolation and digital filtering. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Proc 1978;26:508-17.
15. Parker JA, Kenyon RV, Troxel DE. Comparison of interpolating methods for image resampling. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1983;2:31-9.
16. Proakis JG, Manolakis DG. Introduction to digital signal processing. 1st ed. New York: Macmillan, 1988.
17. Horn BKP. Robot vision 1st ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986.
18. Keys RG. Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Proc 1981;29:1153-60.
19. Park SK, Schowengerdt RA. Image reconstruction by parametric cubic convolution. Comput Vis Graph Image Proc 1983;23:258-72.
20. Maeland E. On the comparison of interpolation methods. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1988;7:213-7.
21. Frieder G, Gordon D, Reynolds RA. Back-to-front display of voxel-based objects. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1985;5: 52-60.
22. Reynolds RA, Gordon D, Chen LS. A dynamic screen technique for shaded graphics display of slice-represented objects. Comput Vis Graph Image Proc 1987;38:275-98.
23. Henkelman RM. Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. Med Phys 1985;12:232-33.
24. Schreiner S. Evaluation of ray tracing methods for maximum intensity projection images: a critical comparison. Ph.D. dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 1994.
25. Schreiner S, Galloway RL. A fast maximum intensity projection algorithm for magnetic resonance angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1993;12:50-7.
26. Schreiner S. A fast maximum intensity projection algorithm for magnetic resonance angiography. Master's thesis, Vanderbilt University, 1991.
27. Brown DG, Riederer SJ. Contrast-to-noise ratios in maximum intensity projection images. Magn Res Med 1992;23:130-7.