Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1487-1494

  Wang, Chin A ^a,c   Radach, Ralph ^b   Inhoff, A W ^c  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL FIELD;

ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 73449110571     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.7.1487     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ANGELE, B., SLATTERY, T. J., YANG, J., KLIEGL, R., & RAYNER, K. (2008). Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n + 1 and n+2 previews simultaneously. Visual Cognition, 16,697-707.
2. DRIEGHE, D., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (2008). Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1239-1249.
3. ENGBERT, R., LONGTIN, A., & KLIEGL, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42,621-636.
4. ENGBERT, R., NUTHMANN, A., & KLIEGL, R. (2007) An iterative algorithm for the estimation of the distribution of mislocated fixations during reading. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 319-337). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. ENGBERT, R., NUTHMANN, A., RICHTER, E. M., & KLIEGL, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813.
6. FENG, G. (2006). Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 70-95.
7. INHOFF, A. W., & RADACH, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 2954). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. INHOFF, A. W., RADACH, R., & EITER, B. (2006). Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: Reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32,1490-1495.
9. INHOFF, A. W., STARR, M., & SHINDLER, K. L. (2000). Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? Perception & Psychophysics, 62,1474-1484.
10. INHOFF, A. W., WANG, C.-A., SOLOMON, M. J., & SEYMOUR, B. A. (2007, November). Is word processing during reading strictly serial? Evidence from preview benefits of n+2. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach, CA.
11. KENNEDY, A., & PYNTE, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45,153-168.
12. KLIEGL, R., NUTHMANN, A., & ENGBERT, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135,12-35.
13. KLIEGL, R., RISSE, S., & LAUBROCK, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33,1250-1255.
14. MCDONALD, S. A., CARPENTER, R. H. S., & SHILLCOCK, R. C. (2005). An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 112, 814-840.
15. MORRISON, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 667-682.
16. POLLATSEK, A., JUHASZ, B. J., REICHLE, E. D., MACHACEK, D., & RAYNER, K. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: A reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 726-750.
17. POLLATSEK, A., REICHLE, E. D., & RAYNER, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eyemovement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52,1-56.
18. RADACH, R., & GLOVER, L. M. (2007, August). Exploring the limits of spatially distributed word processing in normal reading: A new look atn - 2 preview effects. Paper presented at the European Conference on Eye Movements, Potsdam, Germany.
19. RADACH, R., REILLY, R. [G.], & INHOFF, A.W. (2007). Models of oculomotor control in reading: Toward a theoretical foundation of current debates. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 237-269). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. RAYNER, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7,65-81.
21. RAYNER, K. ( 1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124,372-422.
22. RAYNER, K., JUHASZ, B. J., & BROWN, S. J. (2007). Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33,230-245.
23. RAYNER, K., POLLATSEK, A., DRIEGHE, D., SLATTERY, T. J., & REICHLE, E. D. (2007). Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 520-529.
24. RAYNER, K., WHITE, S. J., KAMBE, G., MILLER, B., & LIVERSEDGE, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. REICHLE, E. D., POLLATSEK, A., FISHER, D. L., & RAYNER, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105,125-157.
26. REICHLE, E. D., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7,4-22.
27. REICHLE, E. D., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26,445-526.
28. REILLY, R. G., & RADACH, R. (2003). Foundations of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 429-456). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. REILLY, R. G., & RADACH, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7,34-55.
30. SALVUCCI, D. D. (2001). An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research, 1,201-220.
31. YANG, S.-N. (2006). An oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/interaction model. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 56-69.