Class II treatment with fixed functional orthodontic appliances before and after the pubertal growth peak - A cephalometric study to evaluate differential therapeutic effects;Distalbissbehandlung mit festsitzenden funktionskieferorthopädischen Apparaturen vor Erreichen und nach Überschreiten des puberalen Wachstumsgipfels - eine kephalometrische Studie zur Evaluierung differentialtherapeutischer Effekte

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 511-527

  Frye, Linda ^a,c   Diedrich, Peter R ^a   Kinzinger, Gero S M ^a,b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Class II malocclusion; Distoclusion; Fixed functional orthodontic appliances; Postpubertal; Prepubertal

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; PUBERTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 73449090115     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-009-9938-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. P.L. Angelle 1973 A cephalometric study of the soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment Trans Eur Orthod Soc 49 267 280
2. F.A. Bascifici S. Usumez 2003 Effects of Extraction and nonextraction treatment on Class I and Class II subjects Angle Orthod 73 36 42
3. Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. A manual of facial growth. A computer analysis of longitudinal cephalometric growth data. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
4. Birch RH, Huggins DG. A cephalometric analysis of upper lip profile changes following retraction of upper lip incisiors. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1963;309-315.
5. S.E. Bishara J.E. Jamison L.C. Peterson W.H. DeKock 1981 Longitudinal changes in standing height and mandibular parameters between ages of 8 and 17 years Am J Orthod 80 115 135 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90213-X 6943933 (Pubitemid 11005655)
6. Björk A. Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on the stages of maturation. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1972;61-74.
7. L.A. Bloom 1961 Perioral profile changes in orthodontic treatment Am J Orthod 47 371 379 10.1016/0002-9416(61)90177-4
8. A.R. Collett 2000 Review of the literature: Current concepts on functional appliances and mandibular growth stimulation Aust Dent J 45 173 178 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00553.x 11062934
9. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications, 1940.
10. Fränkel C, Fränkel R. Der Funktionsregler in der orofazialen Orthopädie. Heidelberg: Hüthig, 1992.
11. Frevert A. Statistische Untersuchung über Häufigkeiten von Gebissanomalien bei Schulkindern. Med Diss, Berlin 1934.
12. L.D. Garner 1974 Soft tissue changes concurrent with orthodontic tooth movement Am J Orthod 66 367 376 10.1016/0002-9416(74)90047-5 4528940
13. D. Gesch 2000 A longitudinal study on growth in untreated children with angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion J Orofac Orthop 61 20 33 10.1007/BF02340929 10682408
14. E.M. Harkness 1969 The prevalence of malocclusion in a random sample of 12-year-old Cardiff schoolgirls Dent Pract Dent Rec 20 77
15. H.G. Hershey 1972 Incisior tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postadolescent female patients Am J Orthod 61 45 54 10.1016/0002-9416(72) 90175-3 4500186
16. H.S. Horowitz 1970 A study of occlusal relations in 10 to 12 year old caucasian and negro children - summary report Int Dent J 20 593 605 5276609
17. S.O. Jakobsson 1967 Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, division 1 malocclusions Am J Orthod 53 446 457 10.1016/0002-9416(67)90005- X 5229868
18. M.L. Jones 1991 A comparison of orthodontic treatment changes as measured from study casts and cephalometric radiographs Br J Orthod 18 199 203
19. G. Kinzinger P. Diedrich 2005 Skeletal effects in Class II treatment with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA)? J Orfac Orthop 66 469 490 10.1007/s00056-005-0524-2
20. G. Kinzinger L. Frye P. Diedrich 2009 Class II treatment in adults: Comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery-a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects J Orofac Orthop 70 63 91 10.1007/s00056-009-0821-2 19194676
21. M. Lai JA. McNamara 1998 An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy Semin Orthod 4 46 58 10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80041-8 9573874
22. T. Magnusson 1977 An epidemiologic study of dental space anomalies in Icelandic schoolchildren Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 5 292 300 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1977.tb01017.x 272256
23. J.A. McNamara Jr F.L. Bookstein T.G. Shaughnessy 1985 Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients Am J Orthod 88 91 110 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90233-7 3861103
24. J.A. McNamara Jr R.P. Howe T.G. Dischinger 1990 A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 134 144 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70007-Y 2378319
25. J.A. McNamara Jr J.E. Peterson Jr R.G. Alexander 1996 Three dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition Semin Orthod 2 114 137 10.1016/S1073-8746(96)80048-X 9161275
26. C.M. Mills K.J. McCulloch 1998 Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 15 24 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70232-X 9674675
27. P.W. Ngan E. Byczek J. Scheick 1997 Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II division 1 subjects Semin Orthod 3 222 231 10.1016/S1073-8746(97)80055-2 9573884
28. H. Pancherz 1979 Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 76 423 442
29. H. Pancherz 1982 The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 82 104 113
30. H. Pancherz U. Hägg 1985 Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance Am J Orthod 88 273 287 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90126-5 3863486
31. H. Pancherz K. Hansen 1986 Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation Eur J Orthod 8 215 228 3466794
32. H. Pancherz C. Littmann 1988 Somatische Reife und morphologische Veränderungen des Unterkiefers bei der Herbst-Behandlung Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 20 455 470 3272283
33. H. Pancherz C. Littmann 1989 Morphologie und Lage des Unterkiefers bei der Herbst-Behandlung. Eine kephalometrische Analyse der Veränderungen bis zum Wachstumsabschluss Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 21 493 513 2636215
34. H. Pancherz M. Anehus-Pancherz 1993 The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 510 520 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70090- B 8506812
35. J.E. Peterson JR R.G. Alexander 1996 Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition Semin Orthod 2 114 137 10.1016/S1073-8746(96)80048-X
36. N. Roose 1977 Soft tissue profile changes in Class II treatment Am J Orthod 72 165 174 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90057-4 (Pubitemid 8168844)
37. S. Ruf H. Pancherz 1998 Kiefergelenkswachstumsadaptation bei jungen Erwachsenen während Behandlung mit der Herbst-Apparatur. Eine prospektive magnetresonanztomographische und kephalometrische Studie Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 30 735 750
38. S. Ruf H. Pancherz 1999 Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance Angle Orthod 69 239 246 10371429
39. S. Ruf H. Pancherz 1999 Temporomandibular joint remodelling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment. A prospective longitudinal MRI and cephalometric roentgenographic investigation Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 607 618 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70285-4 10358242
40. S. Ruf H. Pancherz 2006 Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects Eur J Orthod 28 352 360 10.1093/ejo/cji116 16644850 (Pubitemid 44290346)
41. Sander FG. Herausnehmbare kieferorthopädische Geräte. In: Schmuth G, Hrsg. Kieferorthopädie I. Praxis der Zahnheilkunde, Bd 11. München, Wien, Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzberg, 1994:131-220.
42. F.G. Sander A. Wichelhaus 1995 Skelettale und dentale Veränderungen bei der Anwendung der Vorschubdoppelplatte Fortschr Kieferorthop 56 127 139 10.1007/BF02276629 7789922
43. H.G. Sergl 1982 Die vertikale Veränderung im Zuge der funktionskieferorthopädischen Behandlung der Angle-Klasse-II,1 Anomalie Fortschr Kieferorthop 69 467 476 10.1007/BF02167190
44. J. Stiehl B. Müller J. Dibbets 2009 The development of the cervical vertebrae as an indicator of skeletal maturity: Comparison with the classic method of hand-wrist-radiograph J Orofac Orthop 70 327 335 10.1007/s00056-009- 9918-x 19649580
45. B. Thilander N. Myrberg 1973 The malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren Scand J Dent Res 81 12 21 4510864
46. R. VanLaecken C.A. Martin T. Dischinger, et al. 2006 Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance. A cephalometric and tomographic investigation Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 582 593 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.030 17110255 (Pubitemid 44716642)
47. O. Vyslozil E. Jonke 1994 Kieferorthopädisch-anthropometrische Vergleichsuntersuchung an 100 Jahre alten menschlichen Schädeln und österreichischen Bundesheersoldaten Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 26 409 436