Skeletal effects in Class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA)?;Skelettale Effekte bei der Therapie von Distalbisslagen mit dem Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA)?

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 469-490

  Kinzinger, Gero ^a   Diedrich, Peter ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Class II malocclusion; Distal bite; Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA); Mandibular growth; Skeletal effects

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; BONE GROWTH; BONE STRUCTURE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; FEMALE; GROWTH ACCELERATION; GROWTH STIMULATION; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBERTY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33645750307     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-005-0524-2     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aelbers CMF, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics in orthodontics: Part I, fiction or reality - a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:513-9.
2. Baer MJ. Dimensional changes in the human head and face in the third decade of life. Am J Phys Anthrop 1956;14:557-75.
3. Behrents RG. Growth in the aging craniofacial skeleton. Monograph No. 17, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor, Mi: The University of Michigan, 1985.
4. Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. A manual of facial growth. A computer analysis of longitudinal cephalometric growth data. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
5. Bishara SE, Jamison JE, Peterson LC, et al. Longitudinal changes in standing height and mandibular parameters between ages of 8 and 17 years. Am J Orthod 1981;80:115-35.
6. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Vorhies B, et al. Changes in dentofacial structures in untreated Class II division 1 and normal subjects: A longitudinal study. Angle Orthod 1997;67:55-66.
7. Björk A. Variations in the growth of the human mandible: Longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res Suppl 1963;42:400-11.
8. Björk A, Helm S. Prediction of the age of maximum puberal growth in body height. Angle Orthod 1967;37:134-43.
9. Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969;55:585-99.
10. Björk A. Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on the stages of maturation. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1972;61-74.
11. Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972;62:339-83.
12. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth in the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal chephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:1-46.
13. Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Turkewicz J, et al. A polynomial approach to craniofacial growth: Description and comparison of adolescent males with normal occlusion and those with untreated Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:437-42.
14. Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Demirjian A, et al. Mathematical models of longitudinal mandibular growth for children with normal and untreated Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:227-34.
15. Cash RG. Adult non extraction treatment with a Jasper Jumper. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:43-7.
16. Collett AR. Review of the literature: Current concepts on functional appliances and mandibular growth stimulation. Aust Dent J 2000;45:173-8.
17. Crismani AG, Freudenthaler JW, Tripolt H, et al. Ausmaß und Konstanz der Kraftabgabe intermaxillärer Kraftquellen: Jasper Jumper, Williams Jumper, Kl II Gummizüge. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1998;30:451-8.
18. Crismani AG, Freudenthaler JW, Köle EG. Die Behandlung einer Kl II/ 1-Malokklusion unter Verwendung der Eureka-Feder - ein Fallbericht. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1999;31:245-52.
19. Croft, RS, Buschang PH, English JD, et al. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:435-43.
20. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications, 1940.
21. Decrue A, Wieslander L. Veränderungen der Fossa articularis nach Vorverlagerung der Mandibula mittels Herbstapparatur. Zahnärztl Prax 1990;41:360-5.
22. Eckhart JE. Introducing the MARA. Clin Impress 1998;3:2-27.
23. Fränkel C, Fränkel R. Der Funktionsregler in der orofazialen Orthopädie. Heidelberg: Hüthig, 1992.
24. Fränkel R. Funktionskieferorthopädie und der Mundhof als apparative Basis. Berlin: VEB Volk und Gesundheit, 1967.
25. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, et al. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:51-62.
26. Hägg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II division I malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:169-76.
27. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: A cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:285-95.
28. Heinig N, Göz G. Clinical application and effects of the Forsus™ spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop 2001;62:436-50.
29. Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part 1 - the hard tissues. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:501-16.
30. Jakobsson SO. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1967;53:446-57.
31. Johnston L. A comparative analysis of Class II treatments. In: Vig PS, Ribbens KA, eds. Clinical judgment in orthodontics. Monograph No. 19, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor, Mi: The University of Michigan, 1986:103-48.
32. Katsavrias EG, Voudouris JC. The treatment effect of mandibular protrusive appliances on the glenoid fossa for Class II correction. Angle Orthod 2004;74:79-85.
33. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with Bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:40-50.
34. Kinzinger G, Ostheimer J, Förster F, et al. Development of a new fixed functional appliance for treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion. First report. J Orofac Orthop 2002;63:384-99.
35. Komposch G, Hockenjos C. Die Reaktionsfähigkeit des temporomandibulären Knorpels. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1977;38:121-32.
36. Konik M, Pancherz H, Hansen K. The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:87-91.
37. Lai M, McNamara Jr JA. An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted Edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod 1998;4:46-58.
38. Lewis AB, Roche AF. Late growth changes in the craniofacial skeleton. Angle Orthod 1988;58:127-35.
39. Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of twin blocks: A prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:104-10.
40. McNamara Jr JA. Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptions to altered function in the orofacial region. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1973;64:578-606.
41. McNamara Jr JA. Functional determinants of craniofacial size and shape. Eur J Orthod 1980;2:131-59.
42. McNamara Jr JA, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985;88:91-110.
43. McNamara Jr JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134-44.
44. McNamara Jr JA, Peterson Jr JE, Alexander RG. Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 1996;2:114-37.
45. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: A cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:15-24.
46. Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J. Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod 1997;3:222-31.
47. Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1979;76:423-42.
48. Pancherz H. The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: A follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of class II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:49-60.
49. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1982;82:104-13.
50. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance - its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985;87:1-20.
51. Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1985;88:273-87.
52. Pancherz H, Littmann C. Somatische Reife und morphologische Veränderungen des Unterkiefers bei der Herbst-Behandlung. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1988;20:455-70.
53. Pancherz H, Littmann C. Morphologie und Lage des Unterkiefers bei der Herbst-Behandlung. Eine kephalometrische Analyse der Veränderungen bis zum Wachstumsabschluss. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1989;21:493-513.
54. Pancherz H. The nature of class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: A cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:220-33.
55. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:510-20.
56. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:275-86.
57. Pancherz H. Früh- oder Spätbehandlung mit der Herbst-Apparatur - Stabilität oder Rezidiv. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1994;26:437-45.
58. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 1997;3:232-43.
59. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position changes in Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:437-46.
60. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Ortho D, et al. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:286-95.
61. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Oudet CL. Control processes in the postnatal growth of the condylar cartilage of the mandible. In: McNamara Jr JA, ed. Determinants of mandibular form and growth. Monograph No. 4, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor, Mi: The University of Michigan,1975:101-53.
62. Riesmeijer AM, Prahl-Andersen B, Mascarenhas AK, et al. A comparison of craniofacial Class I and Class II growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:463-71.
63. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Kiefergelenkswachstumsadaptation bei jungen Erwachsenen während Behandlung mit der Herbst-Apparatur. Eine prospektive magnetresonanztomographische und kephalometrische Studie. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1998;30:735-50.
64. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: A prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:375-88.
65. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 1999;69:239-46.
66. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodelling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment. A prospective longitudinal MRI and cephalometric roentgenographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:607-18.
67. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II division 1 treatment: Mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:140-52.
68. Sander FG. Indikation für die Anwendung der Vorschubdoppelplatte. Prakt Kieferorthop 1988;2:209-22.
69. Taranger J, Hägg U. The timing and duration of adolescent growth. Acta Odontol Scand 1980;38:57-67.
70. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, et al. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:391-400.
71. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:62-72.
72. Vardimon AD, Graber TM, Voss LR, et al. Functional orthopedic magnetic appliance (FOMA III)-modus operandi. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97:135-48.
73. Voudouris JC, Woodside D, Altuna G, et al. Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, Part 2. Results and conclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:13-29.
74. Weiland FJ, Bantleon H-P. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance - a preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:341-50.
75. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984;86:1-13.
76. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodelling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:181-98.