Analyzing the factors that affect information systems use: A task-technology fit meta-analysis

Journal of Computer Information Systems

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 108-123

  Cane, Sheila ^a   McCarthy, Richard ^b  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Qualitative research; Quantitative research; Task technology fit

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS USE; META-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE IMPACT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES; TASK TECHNOLOGY FIT; TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 73349107104     PISSN: 08874417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Belanger, P., Collins, R.W., & Cheney, P.H. (2001). Technology Requirements and Work Group Communications for Telecommuters. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 155- 176.
2. Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo Vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 211-218.
3. D'Ambra, J., & Rice, R.E. (2001). Emerging Factors in User Evaluation of the World Wide Web. Information and Management, 38, 373-384.
4. D'Ambra, J., & Wilson, C.S. (2004a). Explaining Perceived Performance of the World Wide Web: Uncertainty and the Task-Technology Fit Model. Internet Research, 14(A), 294- 310.
5. D'Ambra, J., & Wilson, C.S. (2004b). Use of the World Wide Web for International Travel: Integrating the Construct of Uncertainty in Information Seeking and the Task-Technology Fit Model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 731-742.
6. DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 5(1), 60-95.
7. Dennis, A.R., Wixom, B.H., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2001). Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems Via Meta-Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 167-193.
8. Dishaw. M.T., & Strong, D.M. (1998a). Assessing Software Maintenance Tool Utilization using Task-Technology Fit and Fitness-For-Use Models. Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 10, 151-179.
9. Dishaw, M.T., & Strong, D.M. (1998b). Supporting Software Maintenance with Software Engineering Tools: A Computed Task-Technology Fit Analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software, 44(2), 107-120.
10. Dishaw, M.T., & Strong, D.M. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9-21.
11. Dishaw, M.T., & Strong, D.M. (2003). The Effect of Task and Tool Experience on Maintenance CASE Tool Usage. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(3), 1-16.
12. Ferratt, T.W., & Vlahos, G.E. (1998). An Investigation of Task- Technology Fit for Managers in Greece and the US. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 123-136.
13. th Hawaii Conference on System Sciences, HA, 2004,1-10.
14. Gebauer, J., & Shaw, M.J. (2004). Success Factors and Impacts of Mobile Business Applications: Results from a Mobile e-Procurement Study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 19-41.
15. Gebauer, J., & Shaw, M.J. and Gribbins, M.L. Usage and Impact of Mobile Business Applications - An Assessment Based on the Concepts of Task/Technology Fit. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, NY, Aug 4-6, 2004, 2801-2810.
16. Goette, T. (2000). Keys to the Adoption and Use of Voice Recognition Technology in Organizations. Information Technology & People, 13(1), 67-80.
17. Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems. Management Science, 41(12), 1827-1844.
18. Goodhue, D. (1997). The Model Underlying the Measurement of the Impacts of the IIC on the End-Users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(5), 449-453. (Pubitemid 127612348)
19. Goodhue, D.L. (1998). Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information Systems. Decision Sciences, 29(1), 105-138.
20. Goodhue, D. L., Klein, B. D., & March, S. T. (2000). User Evaluations of IS as Surrogates for Objective Performance. Information & Management, 38, 87-101.
21. Goodhue, D., Littlefield, R., & Straub, D. (1997). The Measurement of the Impacts of the IIC on the End-Users: The Survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(5), 454-465. (Pubitemid 127612349)
22. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
23. GrossmanM., Aronson, J.E., & McCarthy, R. V. (2004). Does UML Make the Grade? Insights from the Software Development Community. Information and Software Technology, 47(6), (2005), 383-397.
24. Heine, M.L., Grover, V., & Malhotra, M.K. (2003). The Relationship between Technology and Performance: A Meta- Analysis of Technology Models. Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, 31, 189-204.
25. IP Kwai Fun, R. An Exploratory Study on how Weblog Technologies Fit Virtual Community Members' Social Needs. Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE, August 11-14,2005, 3555- 3560.
26. Junglas, I.A., & Watson, R.T. U-Commerce: An Experimental Investigation of Ubiquity and Uniqueness. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, WA, Dec 14-17,2003,414-426.
27. Karimi, J., Somers, T.M., & Gupta, YP. (2004). Impact of Environmental Uncertainty and Task Characteristics on User Satisfaction with Data. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 175-193.
28. Kerr, D.S., & Murthy, U.S. (2004). Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer- Mediated and Face-to-face Communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(4), 381-399.
29. Klaus, T, Gyires, T, & Wen, J.H. (2003). The Use of Web-Based Information Systems for Non-Work Activities: An Empirical Study. Human Systems Management, 22, 105-114.
30. Klopping, I.M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task-Technology Fit Model to Consumer E-Commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(1), 35-48.
31. Kositanurit, B., Ngwenyama, O., & Osei-Bryson, K. (2007). An Exploration of Factors that Impact Individual Performance in and ERP Environment: An Analysis using Multiple Analytical Techniques. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 556-568.
32. Lee, C, Cheng, H.K, & Cheng, H. (2007). An Empirical Study of Mobile Commerce in Insurance Industry: Task-Technology Fit and Individual Differences. Decision Support Systems, 43(2007), 95-110.
33. Lending, D., & Straub, D.W. (1997). Impacts of an Integrated Information Center on Faculty End-Users: A Qualitative Assessment Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(5), 466-471.
34. Lightner, N. Assessing User Competence for Multiattribute Data Cognition. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, Aug 9-11, 2002, 1082- 1091.
35. Lim, K.H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). The Effect of Multimedia on Perceived Equivocality and Perceived Usefulness of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 449-471.
36. Lucas, H.C., & Spitler, V. (2000). Implementation in a World of Workstations and Networks. Information and Management, 38, 119-128.
37. Mathieson, K., & Keil, M. (1998). Beyond the Interface: Ease of Use and Task/Technology Fit. Information and Management, 34(4), 221-230.
38. McCarthy, R.V., & Aronson, J.E. (2003). An Analysis of Knowledge Management in the Public and Private Sectors. Invited Chapter in Information Systems: Academic and Practitioner Global Alliances. The Information Institute.
39. McCarthy, R.V., Aronson, J.E., & Claffey, G. Task-Technology Fit in Data Warehousing Environments: Analyzing the Factors that Affect Utilization. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, Aug 9-11, 2002,40-46.
40. rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HA, 2000,1-10.
41. Nance, W.D., & Straub, D.W. (1996). An Investigation of Task/Technology Fit and Information Technology Choices in Knowledge Work. Journal of Information Technology Management, 7(3&4), 1-14
42. Shirani, A.I., Tafti, M.H.A., & Affisco, J.F. (1999). Task and Technology Fit: A Comparison of Two Technologies for Synchronous and Asynchronous Group Communication. Information & Management, 36,139-150.
43. Staples, D.S., & Seddon, P. (2004). Testing the Technology-to- Performance Chain Model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(4), 17-36.
44. Stolk, D., Alexandrian, D., Gros, B., & Paggio, R. (2001). Gaming and Multimedia Applications for Environmental Crisis Management Training. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 627-642.
45. Strong, D.M., Dishaw, M.T., & Bandy. D.B. (2006). Extending Task Technology Fit with Computer Self-Efficacy. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 37(2/3), 96-107.
46. Venkatraman, N. (1989). The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444.
47. Vlahos, G.E., Ferratt, T.W., & Knoepfle, G. (2004). The Use of Computer-Based Information Systems by German Managers to Support Decision Making. Information and Management, 41, 763-779.
48. Wongpinunwatana, N., Ferguson, C, & Bowen, R (2000). An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Artificial Intelligence Systems on the Training of Novice Auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 75(6), 306-316.
49. Wu, J., Chen, Y., & Lin, L. (2004). Empirical Evaluation of the Revised End User Computing Acceptance Model. Article in Press in Computers in Human Behavior, 1-15.
50. Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B., K. (1998). A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 313-334.