The use of Web-based information systems for non-work activities: An empirical study

Human Systems Management

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 105-114

  Klaus, Tim ^a   Gyires, Tibor ^b   Wen, H Joseph ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Non work activities; Task technology fit model; Technology acceptance model; Web based information systems

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; WORLD WIDE WEB;

NON-WORK ACTIVITIES; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 1942485409     PISSN: 01672533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. D.A. Adams, R.R. Nelson and P.A. Todd, Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication, MIS Quarterly 16(2) (1992), 227-248.
2. R.H. Ashton and S.S. Kramer, Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: some evidence, Journal of Accounting Research (1980), 1-15.
3. M.K. Chang and W. Cheung, Determinants of the intention to use Internet/WWW at work: a confirmatory study, Information & Management 39 (2001), 1-14.
4. F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35(8) (1989), 982-1003.
5. F.D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results, Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1986).
6. J. D'Ambra and R.E. Rice, Emerging factors in user evaluation of the World Wide Web, Information & Management 38(6) (2001), 373-384.
7. G.W. Dickson, G. DeSanctis and D.J. McBride, Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach, Communications of the ACM 29(1) (1986), 40-47.
8. M.T. Dishaw and D.M. Strong, Extending the technology acceptance model with Task-Technology Fit constructs, Information & Management 36(1) (1999), 9-21.
9. D.L. Goodhue and R.L. Thompson, Task-Technology Fit and individual performance, MIS Quarterly (1995), 213-236.
10. D.L. Goodhue, Supporting users of corporate data: the effect of I/S policy choices, Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1988).
11. D.L. Goodhue, Understanding user evaluations of information systems, Management Science 41(12) (1995), 1827-1844.
12. D.L. Goodhue, B.D. Klein and S.T. March, User evaluation of IS as surrogates for objective performance, Information & Management 38(2) (2000), 87-101.
13. D.L. Huffman, W.D. Kalsbeek and T.P. Novak, Internet and Web use in the U.S., Communications of the ACM 39(12) (1996), 36-46.
14. J.J. Jiang, M. Hsu, G. Klein and B. Lin, E-commerce user behavior model: an empirical study, Human Systems Management 19 (2000), 265-276.
15. J.E. Klobas, Beyond information quality: fitness for purpose and electronic information resource use, Journal of Information Science 21(2) (1995), 95-114.
16. R. Kraut, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler-and T. Mukhopadhyay, Why people use the Internet, http://homenet.andrew.cmu.edu/progress/purpose.html (2002).
17. C. Liu and K.P. Arnett, Exploring the factors associated with web site success in the context of electronic commerce, Information & Management 38(1) (2000), 23-33.
18. A.P. Massey, M. Montoya-Weiss, C. Hung and V. Ramesh, Cultural perceptions of Task-Technology Fit: acknowledging cultural differences helps companies build the strongest global virtual teams and determine the strongest tools they need, Communications of the ACM 44(12) (2001), 83-84.
19. K. Mathieson and M. Keil, Beyond the interface: ease of use and Task/Technology Fit, Information & Management 34 (1998), 221-230.
20. K. Mathieson, Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior, Information Systems Research 2(3) (1991), 173-191.
21. D. Straub, M. Keil and W. Brenner, Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study, Information & Management 33(1) (1997), 1-11.
22. I. Vessey, Cognitive Fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs vs. tables literature, Decision Sciences 22(2) (1991), 219-240.
23. I. Zigurs and B. Buckland, A theory of Task/Technology Fit and group support systems effectiveness, MIS Quarterly (1998), 313-334.
24. I. Zigurs, B. Buckland, J. Connolly and V. Wilson, A test of Task-Technology Fit theory for group support systems, Database for Advances in Information Systems (1999), 34-50.