Extending Task Technology Fit with Computer Self-Efficacy

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 37, Issue , 2006, Pages 96-107

  Strong, Diane M ^a   Dishaw, Mark T ^b   Brent Bandy, D ^b  

^a WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer Self Efficacy (CSE); Fit; Individual Characteristics; Individual Differences; Task Technology Fit (TTF) models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977606473     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1161345.1161358     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1998). “A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 204–215.
2. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999). “Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?” Decision Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 361–391.
3. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., and Stair, R. (2000). “The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Literacy - An Empirical Assessment,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 418–430.
4. Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.E. (1983). “Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction,” Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 530–545.
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
7. Berthon, P., Pitt, L., Ewing, M., and Carr, C.L. (2002). “Potential Research Space in MIS: A Framework for Envisioning and Evaluating Research Repli cation, Extension, and Generation,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 416–427.
8. Chin, W.W. (1998). “The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling,” in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed), Modern Methods for Business Research, Ch. 10, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295–336.
9. Chin, W.W. and Gopal, A. (1995). “Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs,” DATA BASE, Vol. 26, No. 2/3, pp. 42–64.
10. Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., and Newsted, P.R. (1996). “A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, Ohio, pp. 21–41.
11. Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. (1995). “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 189 211.
12. Davis, F.D. (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 318–339.
13. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1998a). “Assessing Software Maintenance Tool Utilization Using Task- Technology Fit and Fitness-for-Use Models,” Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 151–179.
14. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1998b). “Supporting Software Maintenance with Software Engineering Tools: A Computed Task-Technology Fit Analysis,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 44, pp. 107–120.
15. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1999). “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task- Technology Fit Constructs,” Information and Management, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 9–21.
16. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (2003). “The Effect of Task and Tool Experience on Maintenance CASE Tool Usage,” Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 1–16.
17. Dishaw, M.T., Strong, D.M., and Bandy, D.B. (2001). “Assessing Task-Technology Fit in Simulation Modeling,” Proceedings of the Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 1168–1170.
18. Goodhue, D.L. (1988a). Supporting Users of Corporate Data: The Effect of I/S Policy Choices, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19. Goodhue, D.L. (1988b). “I/S Attributes: Toward Theoretical and Definitional Clarity,” DATA BASE, Vol. 19, No. 3/4, pp. 6–15.
20. th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Kauai, Hawaii, pp. 303–314.
21. Goodhue, D.L. (1995). “Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems,” Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 1827–1844.
22. Goodhue, D.L. (1998). “Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information Systems,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 105–138.
23. Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. (1995). “Task- Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 213–236.
24. Guinan, P.J., Cooprider, J.G., and Sawyer, S. (1997). “The Effective Use of Automated Application Development Tools,” IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 124–139.
25. Henderson, J.C. and Cooprider, J.G. (1990). “Dimensions of I/S Planning and Design Aids: A Functional Model of CASE Technology,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 227–254.
26. Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Wong, W.M., and Tam, K.Y. (2002). “Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 97–124.
27. Ives, B., Olson, M.H., and Baroudi, J.J. (1983). “The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 785–793.
28. Jarvenpaa, S. (1989). “Effect of Task Demands and Graphical Format on Information Processing Strategies,” Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 285–303.
29. Locke, E.A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., and Bobko, P. (1984). “Effect of Self-Efficacy, Goals, and Task Strategies on Task Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 241–251.
30. Marcolin, B.L., Compeau, D.R., Munro, M.C., and Huff S.L. (2000). “Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 37–60.
31. Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., and Lent, R.W. (1991). “Relation of Self-Efficacy Beliefs to Academic Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Investigation,” Jrl. of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 30–38.
32. Tan, J.K.H. and Benbasat, I. (1990). “Processing of Graphical Information: A Decomposition Taxonomy to Match Data Extraction Tasks and Graphical Representations,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 416–439.
33. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., and Howell, J.M. (1994). “Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 167–187.
34. Venkatesh, V. (2000). “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 342–365.
35. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1996). “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 451–481.
36. Venkatramen, N. (1989). “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 423–444.
37. Vessey, I. (1986). “Expertise in Debugging Computer Programs: An Analysis of the Content of Verbal Protocols,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-16, No. 5, pp. 621–637.
38. Vessey, I. (1991). “Cognitive Fit: A Theory-Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 22, pp. 219–240.
39. Vessey, I. and Galletta, D. (1991). “Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition,” Infor. Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 63–84.
40. Webster, J. and Martocchio, J.J. (1992). “Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 201–226.
41. Wixom, B.H. and Watson, H.J. (2001). “An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 17–41.
42. Zhang, P., Benbasat, I., Carey, J., Davis, F., Galletta, D., and Strong, D. (2002). “AMCIS 2002 Panels and Workshops I: Human-Computer Interaction Research in the MIS Discipline,” Communications of the Association of Information Systems, Vol. 9, pp. 334–355.