Urban school reform enabled by transformative professional development: Impact on teacher change and student learning of science

Urban Education

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 4-29

  Johnson, Carla C ^a   Fargo, Jamison D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Professional development; Science education; Student achievement; Teacher change

Indexed keywords

EID: 73249149731     PISSN: 00420859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042085909352073     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
2. Anderson, R.D., & Helms, J.V. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 3-16.
3. Anyon, J. (2001). Inner cities, affluent suburbs, and unequal educational opportunity. In J. Banks & C. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (4th ed., pp. 85-102). New York: John Wiley.
4. Banilower, E.R., Heck, D.J., & Weiss, I.R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the National Science Foundation's Local Systemic Change Through Teacher Enhancement Initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 375-395.
5. Barton, A.C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899-917.
6. Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes [R package version 0.99875-0]. Retrieved July 11, 2007, from http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/lme4.html.
7. Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Routledge Falmer.
8. Borko, H., & Shavelson, R.J. (1990). Teacher decision making. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 311-346). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm. Retrieved July 11, 2007, from the National Academies Press Web site: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html.
10. Czerniak, C.M., Beltyukova, S., Struble, J., Haney, J.J., & Lumpe, A.T. (2005). Do you see what I see? The relationship between a professional development model and student achievement. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Exemplary science in grades 5-8: Standards-based success stories (pp. 13-43). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
11. Fishman, B.J., Marx, R.M., Best, S., & Tal, R.T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643-658.
12. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Goldston, D. (2005). Elementary science: Left behind? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 185-187.
15. Gonzales, P., Guzman, J.C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D.,et al.(2003). Highlights of the Trend in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved September 14, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005005.pdf.
16. Gonzalez, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Horizon Research, Inc. (2002). Local systemic change classroom observation protocol. Retrieved July 11, 2007, from http://www.horizonresearch.com/LSC/manual/0506/tab6/cop0506.pdf.
18. Johnson, C.C. (2006) Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 1-12.
19. Johnson, C.C. (2007a). Whole school collaborative professional development and science teacher change: Signs of success. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 629-662.
20. Johnson, C.C. (2007b). Effective science teaching, professional development, and No Child Left Behind: Barriers, dilemmas, and reality. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 133-136.
21. Johnson, C.C. (in press). Making the case for school-based systemic reform in science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
22. Johnson, C.C., Kahle, J.B., & Fargo, J. (2007a). Effective teaching results in increased science achievement for all students. Science Education, 91, 371-383.
23. Johnson, C.C., Kahle, J.B., & Fargo, J. (2007b). A study of sustained, whole-school, professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 775-786.
24. Johnson, C.C., & Marx, S. (2009) Transformative professional development: A model for urban science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(2), 113-134.
25. Knapp, M.S., & Plecki, M.L. (2001). Investing in the renewal of urban science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1089-1100.
26. Kozol, J. (2005). The Shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown.
27. Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94, 483-496.
28. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dream keepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Lee, O. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English Language Learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 65-93.
30. Lipman, P. (1995). Bringing out the best in them: The contribution of culturally relevant teachers to educational reform. Theory into Practice, 34, 202-208.
31. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K.E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P.W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of mathematics and science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
32. Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 258-271.
33. Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 912-946.
34. Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R.,et al.(2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063-1080.
35. Payne, R.K. (1996). A framework for understanding the poverty. Highlands, TX: aha! Process.
36. Putnam R., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodston (Eds.) The international handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223-1296). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
37. R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available fromhttp://www.R-project.org.
38. Rivet, A.E., & Krajcik, J.S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 669-692.
39. Ruby, A. (2006). Improving science achievement at high-poverty urban middle schools. Science Education, 90, 1005-1027.
40. Schneider, R.M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 410-422.
41. Supovitz, J.A., & Turner, H.M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963-980.
42. Van Driel, J.H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158.